Discrimination at work and criminal records: affirmative action and a case-study of the county of Apucarana - Paraná (Brazil)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista do Direito Público |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/26634 |
Resumo: | The Right to Work is listed as one of the many social rights of the Brazilian Federal Constitution of 1988. In other words, it is a fundamental social right that must be upheld by the State and all its citizens. Therefore, any form of workplace discrimination is prohibited by the Brazilian Constitution and infra-constitutional norms, as well as at the international level, specifically by the ILO Convention no. 111, in its pre-contractual, contractual or post-contractual form. The failure of the employer to hire individuals with criminal records offends the principle of equality, inhibiting the realization of their fundamental right to work, and constitutes an abuse of the employer's power, since it goes against the international and Brazilian legal system. Because it is a discriminatory practice, Brazil adopts affirmative actions in order to reduce this inequality, the main one being the “Projeto Começar de Novo” (Starting Again Project) of the National Council of Justice. One of the most fundamental pillars of Brazilian criminal system is the re-socialization of prison inmates with the use of specific public policies in order for them to enter the workforce. This paper sought to verify whether the practice of requiring the presentation of a Criminal Background Certificate, in fact, occurs, through the application of a questionnaire to those convicted in an open regime at the Municipal Patronage of Apucarana. |
id |
UEL-2_67ea22916f05833843d4e2a88853d6c6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26634 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Discrimination at work and criminal records: affirmative action and a case-study of the county of Apucarana - Paraná (Brazil)Discriminação no Trabalho e Antecedentes Criminais: Ações Afirmativas e Estudo de Caso no Patronato Municipal de ApucaranaDiscrimination at work. Criminal Background. Affirmative Actions. Re-socialization.Discriminação no TrabalhoAntecedentes CriminaisAção AfirmativaRessocializaçãoThe Right to Work is listed as one of the many social rights of the Brazilian Federal Constitution of 1988. In other words, it is a fundamental social right that must be upheld by the State and all its citizens. Therefore, any form of workplace discrimination is prohibited by the Brazilian Constitution and infra-constitutional norms, as well as at the international level, specifically by the ILO Convention no. 111, in its pre-contractual, contractual or post-contractual form. The failure of the employer to hire individuals with criminal records offends the principle of equality, inhibiting the realization of their fundamental right to work, and constitutes an abuse of the employer's power, since it goes against the international and Brazilian legal system. Because it is a discriminatory practice, Brazil adopts affirmative actions in order to reduce this inequality, the main one being the “Projeto Começar de Novo” (Starting Again Project) of the National Council of Justice. One of the most fundamental pillars of Brazilian criminal system is the re-socialization of prison inmates with the use of specific public policies in order for them to enter the workforce. This paper sought to verify whether the practice of requiring the presentation of a Criminal Background Certificate, in fact, occurs, through the application of a questionnaire to those convicted in an open regime at the Municipal Patronage of Apucarana.O Direito ao Trabalho está previsto no rol de direitos sociais na Constituição Federal de 1988 e, assim, constitui direito fundamental social, que deve ser garantido a todos, sem qualquer distinção. A discriminação no trabalho é vedada no plano nacional pela Constituição e normas infraconstitucionais, bem como no plano internacional, especificamente, pela Convenção n. 111 da OIT, seja no período pré-contratual, contratual ou pós-contratual. A não contratação pelo empregador de indivíduos que possuam antecedentes criminais ofende o princípio da igualdade, inibindo a efetivação do direito fundamental ao trabalho, e constitui abuso de poder do empregador, pois caminha em sentido contrário ao ordenamento jurídico internacional e brasileiro. Por constituir prática discriminatória, há no Brasil a adoção de ações afirmativas que buscam reduzir esta desigualdade, sendo o principal o Projeto Começar de Novo do Conselho Nacional de Justiça. A política criminal brasileira tem como uma de suas bases a ressocialização dos egressos por meio da inserção no mercado de trabalho pela criação de políticas públicas específicas para este fim. Buscou-se verificar se a prática da exigência de apresentação de certidão de Antecedentes Criminais, de fato, ocorre, mediante a aplicação de questionário aos apenados em regime aberto no Patronato Municipal de Apucarana.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2020-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/2663410.5433/1980-511X.2020v15n1p10Revista do Direito Público; v. 15 n. 1 (2020); 10-251980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/26634/27267Copyright (c) 2020 Revista do Direito Públicohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBalthazar de Paula, BrunaPereira Ribeiro, Luiz Alberto2022-09-23T16:27:44Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26634Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2022-09-23T16:27:44Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Discrimination at work and criminal records: affirmative action and a case-study of the county of Apucarana - Paraná (Brazil) Discriminação no Trabalho e Antecedentes Criminais: Ações Afirmativas e Estudo de Caso no Patronato Municipal de Apucarana |
title |
Discrimination at work and criminal records: affirmative action and a case-study of the county of Apucarana - Paraná (Brazil) |
spellingShingle |
Discrimination at work and criminal records: affirmative action and a case-study of the county of Apucarana - Paraná (Brazil) Balthazar de Paula, Bruna Discrimination at work. Criminal Background. Affirmative Actions. Re-socialization. Discriminação no Trabalho Antecedentes Criminais Ação Afirmativa Ressocialização |
title_short |
Discrimination at work and criminal records: affirmative action and a case-study of the county of Apucarana - Paraná (Brazil) |
title_full |
Discrimination at work and criminal records: affirmative action and a case-study of the county of Apucarana - Paraná (Brazil) |
title_fullStr |
Discrimination at work and criminal records: affirmative action and a case-study of the county of Apucarana - Paraná (Brazil) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Discrimination at work and criminal records: affirmative action and a case-study of the county of Apucarana - Paraná (Brazil) |
title_sort |
Discrimination at work and criminal records: affirmative action and a case-study of the county of Apucarana - Paraná (Brazil) |
author |
Balthazar de Paula, Bruna |
author_facet |
Balthazar de Paula, Bruna Pereira Ribeiro, Luiz Alberto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pereira Ribeiro, Luiz Alberto |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Balthazar de Paula, Bruna Pereira Ribeiro, Luiz Alberto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Discrimination at work. Criminal Background. Affirmative Actions. Re-socialization. Discriminação no Trabalho Antecedentes Criminais Ação Afirmativa Ressocialização |
topic |
Discrimination at work. Criminal Background. Affirmative Actions. Re-socialization. Discriminação no Trabalho Antecedentes Criminais Ação Afirmativa Ressocialização |
description |
The Right to Work is listed as one of the many social rights of the Brazilian Federal Constitution of 1988. In other words, it is a fundamental social right that must be upheld by the State and all its citizens. Therefore, any form of workplace discrimination is prohibited by the Brazilian Constitution and infra-constitutional norms, as well as at the international level, specifically by the ILO Convention no. 111, in its pre-contractual, contractual or post-contractual form. The failure of the employer to hire individuals with criminal records offends the principle of equality, inhibiting the realization of their fundamental right to work, and constitutes an abuse of the employer's power, since it goes against the international and Brazilian legal system. Because it is a discriminatory practice, Brazil adopts affirmative actions in order to reduce this inequality, the main one being the “Projeto Começar de Novo” (Starting Again Project) of the National Council of Justice. One of the most fundamental pillars of Brazilian criminal system is the re-socialization of prison inmates with the use of specific public policies in order for them to enter the workforce. This paper sought to verify whether the practice of requiring the presentation of a Criminal Background Certificate, in fact, occurs, through the application of a questionnaire to those convicted in an open regime at the Municipal Patronage of Apucarana. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-08-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/26634 10.5433/1980-511X.2020v15n1p10 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/26634 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1980-511X.2020v15n1p10 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/26634/27267 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista do Direito Público http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista do Direito Público http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público; v. 15 n. 1 (2020); 10-25 1980-511X reponame:Revista do Direito Público instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
collection |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rdpubuel@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799305932002295808 |