The applicability of the Administrative Improbity Law in relation to political agents
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista do Direito Público |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/23910 |
Resumo: | The applicability of the Law No. 8.429/92 (Administrative Improbity Law) to the political players is not a pacific subject in the doctrine and court decisions. Some support that the political players are submitted to the Law No. 1.079/50, which defines the responsibility crimes, and, by that, the Administrative Improbity Law could not be applied concomitantly. Other understanding support the subjection of those agents to the rules of the Administrative Improbity Law, on account of this having juridical nature distinct from responsibility crimes, allowing it’s application. The present paper has as finality support the subjection of the political players to the Law No. 8.429/92, based on the full analysis of the doctrinal and jurisprudential understandings created around the subject, supporting, however, that the application of the sanctions contained at the Law must be limited to ascertained political players. |
id |
UEL-2_8c5637ed1865b100f604fa27fb0da32d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/23910 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The applicability of the Administrative Improbity Law in relation to political agentsA aplicabilidade da Lei de Improbidade Administrativa aos agentes políticosAdministrative Improbity. Responsibility Crimes. Political PlayersThe applicability of the Law No. 8.429/92 (Administrative Improbity Law) to the political players is not a pacific subject in the doctrine and court decisions. Some support that the political players are submitted to the Law No. 1.079/50, which defines the responsibility crimes, and, by that, the Administrative Improbity Law could not be applied concomitantly. Other understanding support the subjection of those agents to the rules of the Administrative Improbity Law, on account of this having juridical nature distinct from responsibility crimes, allowing it’s application. The present paper has as finality support the subjection of the political players to the Law No. 8.429/92, based on the full analysis of the doctrinal and jurisprudential understandings created around the subject, supporting, however, that the application of the sanctions contained at the Law must be limited to ascertained political players.A aplicabilidade da Lei nº. 8.429/92 (Lei de Improbidade Administrativa) em face dos agentes políticos não é tema pacífico na doutrina e jurisprudência. Há quem sustente que os agentes políticos se submetem à Lei nº 1.079/50, que define os crimes de responsabilidade, e, desta forma, não se pode aplicar a Lei de Improbidade Administrativa concomitantemente. Outra corrente defende a sujeição de tais agentes às normas da Lei de Improbidade Administrativa, em razão desta ter natureza jurídica distinta dos crimes de responsabilidade, permitindo, assim, sua aplicação. O presente trabalho tem como finalidade defender a sujeição dos agentes políticos à Lei 8.429/92, baseando-se na ampla análise de entendimentos doutrinários e jurisprudenciais formados em torno do tema sustentando, porém, que a aplicação das sanções previstas na lei deve ser limitada a determinados agentes políticos.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2015-12-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/2391010.5433/1980-511X.2015v10n3p119Revista do Direito Público; v. 10 n. 3 (2015); 119-1401980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/23910/17605Copyright (c) 2015 Revista do Direito Públicoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAcioli Pimenta, JúliaMiranda Batisti, Nelia Edna2016-05-23T19:46:17Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/23910Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2016-05-23T19:46:17Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The applicability of the Administrative Improbity Law in relation to political agents A aplicabilidade da Lei de Improbidade Administrativa aos agentes políticos |
title |
The applicability of the Administrative Improbity Law in relation to political agents |
spellingShingle |
The applicability of the Administrative Improbity Law in relation to political agents Acioli Pimenta, Júlia Administrative Improbity. Responsibility Crimes. Political Players |
title_short |
The applicability of the Administrative Improbity Law in relation to political agents |
title_full |
The applicability of the Administrative Improbity Law in relation to political agents |
title_fullStr |
The applicability of the Administrative Improbity Law in relation to political agents |
title_full_unstemmed |
The applicability of the Administrative Improbity Law in relation to political agents |
title_sort |
The applicability of the Administrative Improbity Law in relation to political agents |
author |
Acioli Pimenta, Júlia |
author_facet |
Acioli Pimenta, Júlia Miranda Batisti, Nelia Edna |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Miranda Batisti, Nelia Edna |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Acioli Pimenta, Júlia Miranda Batisti, Nelia Edna |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Administrative Improbity. Responsibility Crimes. Political Players |
topic |
Administrative Improbity. Responsibility Crimes. Political Players |
description |
The applicability of the Law No. 8.429/92 (Administrative Improbity Law) to the political players is not a pacific subject in the doctrine and court decisions. Some support that the political players are submitted to the Law No. 1.079/50, which defines the responsibility crimes, and, by that, the Administrative Improbity Law could not be applied concomitantly. Other understanding support the subjection of those agents to the rules of the Administrative Improbity Law, on account of this having juridical nature distinct from responsibility crimes, allowing it’s application. The present paper has as finality support the subjection of the political players to the Law No. 8.429/92, based on the full analysis of the doctrinal and jurisprudential understandings created around the subject, supporting, however, that the application of the sanctions contained at the Law must be limited to ascertained political players. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-12-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/23910 10.5433/1980-511X.2015v10n3p119 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/23910 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1980-511X.2015v10n3p119 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/23910/17605 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Revista do Direito Público info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Revista do Direito Público |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público; v. 10 n. 3 (2015); 119-140 1980-511X reponame:Revista do Direito Público instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Revista do Direito Público |
collection |
Revista do Direito Público |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rdpubuel@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799305931525193728 |