The unique singularity of the object as a foundation for the bidding inexigibility: direct contracting of legal services

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ribeiro, Adriano da Silva
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Gregório, Giovanni Galvão Vilaça, Pontone, Estevão Grill
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista do Direito Público
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/39510
Resumo: Direct contracting, due to the lack of a bidding process, of technical services for legal and legal advice is possible, provided that the requirements of arts. 25, II c / c 13, V, of Law no 8.666 / 93 (BRASIL, 1993) and art, 74, of Law No. 14.133/21 (BRASIL, 2021). However, the issue raises academic discussions and also in the Judiciary, as the indiscriminate use of this exceptionality for the performance of activities that do not present unusual complexities can give rise to the imputation of contractors in an act of administrative improbity, because the contracting does not havethe uniqueness required by the Bidding Law. For the developmentof the article, a methodology based on bibliographic research andthe analytical procedure was used, developing from the critical approach of the consulted works and documents, in order to obtain a reasoned analysis on the subject under study. It is concluded that the direct hiring of a lawyer or law firm by a public entity, by means of unenforceable bidding, in itself, does not constitute an unlawful act.
id UEL-2_f9e63bac87bab75dade9d43447dd6181
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/39510
network_acronym_str UEL-2
network_name_str Revista do Direito Público
repository_id_str
spelling The unique singularity of the object as a foundation for the bidding inexigibility: direct contracting of legal servicesA singularidade do objeto como fundamento para a inexigibilidade de licitação: contratação direta de serviços de advocaciaInexigibilidade de licitaçãoServiços de AdvocaciaSingularidade do objeto.Direct contracting, due to the lack of a bidding process, of technical services for legal and legal advice is possible, provided that the requirements of arts. 25, II c / c 13, V, of Law no 8.666 / 93 (BRASIL, 1993) and art, 74, of Law No. 14.133/21 (BRASIL, 2021). However, the issue raises academic discussions and also in the Judiciary, as the indiscriminate use of this exceptionality for the performance of activities that do not present unusual complexities can give rise to the imputation of contractors in an act of administrative improbity, because the contracting does not havethe uniqueness required by the Bidding Law. For the developmentof the article, a methodology based on bibliographic research andthe analytical procedure was used, developing from the critical approach of the consulted works and documents, in order to obtain a reasoned analysis on the subject under study. It is concluded that the direct hiring of a lawyer or law firm by a public entity, by means of unenforceable bidding, in itself, does not constitute an unlawful act.A contratação direta, por inexigibilidade de licitação, de serviços técnicos de advocacia e consultoria jurídica é possível, desde que atendidos os requisitos dos arts. 25, II c/c 13,V da Lei nº 8.666/93 (BRASIL, 1993). Contudo, o tema suscita discussões acadêmicas e também no Judiciário, na medida em que a utilização indiscriminada dessa excepcionalidade para o desempenho de atividades que não apresentam complexidades incomuns pode ensejar a imputação dos contratantes em ato de improbidade administrativa, porque a contratação não se reveste da singularidade exigida pela Lei de Licitações. Para o desenvolvimento do artigo, empregada metodologia centralizada na pesquisa bibliográfica e no procedimento analítico, desenvolvendo-se a partir da abordagem crítica das obras e documentos consultados, a fim de se obter uma análise fundamentada acerca do tema em estudo. Conclui-se que a contratação direta de advogado ou escritório de advocacia por ente público, por meio de inexigibilidade de licitação, em si, não constitui ato ímprobo.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2023-09-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/3951010.5433/1980-511X.2023v18n2p48Revista do Direito Público; v. 18 n. 2 (2023); 48-641980-511Xreponame:Revista do Direito Públicoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/39510/49334Copyright (c) 2023 Revista do Direito Públicohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRibeiro, Adriano da SilvaGregório, Giovanni Galvão VilaçaPontone, Estevão Grill2023-09-12T17:23:18Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/39510Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopubPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/oai||rdpubuel@uel.br1980-511X1980-511Xopendoar:2023-09-12T17:23:18Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The unique singularity of the object as a foundation for the bidding inexigibility: direct contracting of legal services
A singularidade do objeto como fundamento para a inexigibilidade de licitação: contratação direta de serviços de advocacia
title The unique singularity of the object as a foundation for the bidding inexigibility: direct contracting of legal services
spellingShingle The unique singularity of the object as a foundation for the bidding inexigibility: direct contracting of legal services
Ribeiro, Adriano da Silva
Inexigibilidade de licitação
Serviços de Advocacia
Singularidade do objeto.
title_short The unique singularity of the object as a foundation for the bidding inexigibility: direct contracting of legal services
title_full The unique singularity of the object as a foundation for the bidding inexigibility: direct contracting of legal services
title_fullStr The unique singularity of the object as a foundation for the bidding inexigibility: direct contracting of legal services
title_full_unstemmed The unique singularity of the object as a foundation for the bidding inexigibility: direct contracting of legal services
title_sort The unique singularity of the object as a foundation for the bidding inexigibility: direct contracting of legal services
author Ribeiro, Adriano da Silva
author_facet Ribeiro, Adriano da Silva
Gregório, Giovanni Galvão Vilaça
Pontone, Estevão Grill
author_role author
author2 Gregório, Giovanni Galvão Vilaça
Pontone, Estevão Grill
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ribeiro, Adriano da Silva
Gregório, Giovanni Galvão Vilaça
Pontone, Estevão Grill
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Inexigibilidade de licitação
Serviços de Advocacia
Singularidade do objeto.
topic Inexigibilidade de licitação
Serviços de Advocacia
Singularidade do objeto.
description Direct contracting, due to the lack of a bidding process, of technical services for legal and legal advice is possible, provided that the requirements of arts. 25, II c / c 13, V, of Law no 8.666 / 93 (BRASIL, 1993) and art, 74, of Law No. 14.133/21 (BRASIL, 2021). However, the issue raises academic discussions and also in the Judiciary, as the indiscriminate use of this exceptionality for the performance of activities that do not present unusual complexities can give rise to the imputation of contractors in an act of administrative improbity, because the contracting does not havethe uniqueness required by the Bidding Law. For the developmentof the article, a methodology based on bibliographic research andthe analytical procedure was used, developing from the critical approach of the consulted works and documents, in order to obtain a reasoned analysis on the subject under study. It is concluded that the direct hiring of a lawyer or law firm by a public entity, by means of unenforceable bidding, in itself, does not constitute an unlawful act.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-09-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/39510
10.5433/1980-511X.2023v18n2p48
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/39510
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1980-511X.2023v18n2p48
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/direitopub/article/view/39510/49334
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista do Direito Público
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista do Direito Público
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público; v. 18 n. 2 (2023); 48-64
1980-511X
reponame:Revista do Direito Público
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Revista do Direito Público
collection Revista do Direito Público
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista do Direito Público - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rdpubuel@uel.br
_version_ 1799305933071843328

Registros relacionados