RHETORICAL STRUCTURE OF ARGUMENTATIVE ANSWER

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Antonio, Juliano Desiderato
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: dos Santos, Jackline Altoé
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Signum: Estudos da Linguagem
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/signum/article/view/18325
Resumo: The aim of this paper is to describe the rhetorical structure of the argumentative answer genre in a corpus formed by 15 compositions of the winter vestibular of Universidade Estadual de Maringá. The instrument of analysis used in the investigation was RST (Rhetorical Structure Theory). The initial statement was considered the central unit of the argumentative answer. Most of the writers held evidence relation between the central unit (nucleus) and the expansion (satellite). Evidence relation is interpersonal and the aim of the writers is to convince their addressees (in this case the compositions evaluation committee) that their point is correct. Within the initial statement, the relation with higher frequency was contrast. Our hypothesis is that the selection of texts of the test influenced the applicants to present positive and negative aspects of the internet. In the higher level of the expansion text span, list is the most frequent relation because the applicants present various arguments with the same status. Contrast was the second relation with highest frequency in this same level. Our hypothesis is that the selection of texts of the test influenced the applicants to present positive and negative aspects of the internet as it happened in the initial statement. Within the 15 compositions, 12 had a conclusion. This part was considered a satellite of the span formed by the initial statement and its expansion. The relation held was homonymous.
id UEL-3_580e260f6b43285884761e3bcf2faa6d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18325
network_acronym_str UEL-3
network_name_str Signum: Estudos da Linguagem
repository_id_str
spelling RHETORICAL STRUCTURE OF ARGUMENTATIVE ANSWERA estrutura retórica do gênero resposta argumentativaRST. Argumentative answer. Superstructure.RSTresposta argumentativasuperestruturaThe aim of this paper is to describe the rhetorical structure of the argumentative answer genre in a corpus formed by 15 compositions of the winter vestibular of Universidade Estadual de Maringá. The instrument of analysis used in the investigation was RST (Rhetorical Structure Theory). The initial statement was considered the central unit of the argumentative answer. Most of the writers held evidence relation between the central unit (nucleus) and the expansion (satellite). Evidence relation is interpersonal and the aim of the writers is to convince their addressees (in this case the compositions evaluation committee) that their point is correct. Within the initial statement, the relation with higher frequency was contrast. Our hypothesis is that the selection of texts of the test influenced the applicants to present positive and negative aspects of the internet. In the higher level of the expansion text span, list is the most frequent relation because the applicants present various arguments with the same status. Contrast was the second relation with highest frequency in this same level. Our hypothesis is that the selection of texts of the test influenced the applicants to present positive and negative aspects of the internet as it happened in the initial statement. Within the 15 compositions, 12 had a conclusion. This part was considered a satellite of the span formed by the initial statement and its expansion. The relation held was homonymous.Este trabalho tem como objetivo descrever a estrutura retórica do gênero resposta argumentativa em um corpus formado por 15 redações do concurso vestibular de inverno de 2009 da Universidade Estadual de Maringá. O instrumento de análise foi a RST (Rhetorical Structure Theory – Teoria da Estrutura Retórica). Tomou-se a afirmação inicial como porção nuclear da resposta argumentativa. Entre a afirmação inicial e o desenvolvimento (satélite), os candidatos estabeleceram, em sua maioria, relação de evidência, que tem caráter interpessoal, para tentar convencer seu destinatário (a banca de avaliação das redações) de que seu ponto de vista estava correto. No interior da afirmação inicial, a relação que apresentou maior frequência de ocorrência foi a de contraste. Nossa hipótese é que a própria coletânea de textos da prova do vestibular tenha levado os candidatos a apresentar aspectos positivos e aspectos negativos da internet. No nível mais alto da porção textual que funciona como desenvolvimento, a relação mais frequente é a de lista porque os candidatos apresentam vários argumentos de mesmo estatuto. A segunda relação com maior frequência de ocorrência no nível mais alto da porção que funciona como desenvolvimento é a relação de contraste. Assim como ocorreu no interior da afirmação inicial, essa alta frequência pode ser atribuída às informações presentes na coletânea de textos da prova, que apresentavam aspectos positivos e aspectos negativos da internet. Das 15 redações analisadas, 12 apresentaram conclusão. Essa parte foi considerada satélite da porção textual formada pela afirmação inicial mais o desenvolvimento, e a relação que se estabeleceu foi homônima.UEL2014-12-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/signum/article/view/1832510.5433/2237-4876.2014v17n2p193Signum: Estudos da Linguagem; Vol. 17 No. 2 (2014): Volume Atemático; 193-223Signum: Estudos da Linguagem; v. 17 n. 2 (2014): Volume Atemático; 193-2232237-4876reponame:Signum: Estudos da Linguageminstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/signum/article/view/18325/15700http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAntonio, Juliano Desideratodos Santos, Jackline Altoé2022-11-16T18:10:51Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18325Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/signumPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/signum/oai||signum@uel.br2237-48761516-3083opendoar:2022-11-16T18:10:51Signum: Estudos da Linguagem - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv RHETORICAL STRUCTURE OF ARGUMENTATIVE ANSWER
A estrutura retórica do gênero resposta argumentativa
title RHETORICAL STRUCTURE OF ARGUMENTATIVE ANSWER
spellingShingle RHETORICAL STRUCTURE OF ARGUMENTATIVE ANSWER
Antonio, Juliano Desiderato
RST. Argumentative answer. Superstructure.
RST
resposta argumentativa
superestrutura
title_short RHETORICAL STRUCTURE OF ARGUMENTATIVE ANSWER
title_full RHETORICAL STRUCTURE OF ARGUMENTATIVE ANSWER
title_fullStr RHETORICAL STRUCTURE OF ARGUMENTATIVE ANSWER
title_full_unstemmed RHETORICAL STRUCTURE OF ARGUMENTATIVE ANSWER
title_sort RHETORICAL STRUCTURE OF ARGUMENTATIVE ANSWER
author Antonio, Juliano Desiderato
author_facet Antonio, Juliano Desiderato
dos Santos, Jackline Altoé
author_role author
author2 dos Santos, Jackline Altoé
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Antonio, Juliano Desiderato
dos Santos, Jackline Altoé
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv RST. Argumentative answer. Superstructure.
RST
resposta argumentativa
superestrutura
topic RST. Argumentative answer. Superstructure.
RST
resposta argumentativa
superestrutura
description The aim of this paper is to describe the rhetorical structure of the argumentative answer genre in a corpus formed by 15 compositions of the winter vestibular of Universidade Estadual de Maringá. The instrument of analysis used in the investigation was RST (Rhetorical Structure Theory). The initial statement was considered the central unit of the argumentative answer. Most of the writers held evidence relation between the central unit (nucleus) and the expansion (satellite). Evidence relation is interpersonal and the aim of the writers is to convince their addressees (in this case the compositions evaluation committee) that their point is correct. Within the initial statement, the relation with higher frequency was contrast. Our hypothesis is that the selection of texts of the test influenced the applicants to present positive and negative aspects of the internet. In the higher level of the expansion text span, list is the most frequent relation because the applicants present various arguments with the same status. Contrast was the second relation with highest frequency in this same level. Our hypothesis is that the selection of texts of the test influenced the applicants to present positive and negative aspects of the internet as it happened in the initial statement. Within the 15 compositions, 12 had a conclusion. This part was considered a satellite of the span formed by the initial statement and its expansion. The relation held was homonymous.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-12-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/signum/article/view/18325
10.5433/2237-4876.2014v17n2p193
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/signum/article/view/18325
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/2237-4876.2014v17n2p193
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/signum/article/view/18325/15700
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Signum: Estudos da Linguagem; Vol. 17 No. 2 (2014): Volume Atemático; 193-223
Signum: Estudos da Linguagem; v. 17 n. 2 (2014): Volume Atemático; 193-223
2237-4876
reponame:Signum: Estudos da Linguagem
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Signum: Estudos da Linguagem
collection Signum: Estudos da Linguagem
repository.name.fl_str_mv Signum: Estudos da Linguagem - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||signum@uel.br
_version_ 1799305963363106816