RHETORICAL STRUCTURE OF ARGUMENTATIVE ANSWER
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Signum: Estudos da Linguagem |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/signum/article/view/18325 |
Resumo: | The aim of this paper is to describe the rhetorical structure of the argumentative answer genre in a corpus formed by 15 compositions of the winter vestibular of Universidade Estadual de Maringá. The instrument of analysis used in the investigation was RST (Rhetorical Structure Theory). The initial statement was considered the central unit of the argumentative answer. Most of the writers held evidence relation between the central unit (nucleus) and the expansion (satellite). Evidence relation is interpersonal and the aim of the writers is to convince their addressees (in this case the compositions evaluation committee) that their point is correct. Within the initial statement, the relation with higher frequency was contrast. Our hypothesis is that the selection of texts of the test influenced the applicants to present positive and negative aspects of the internet. In the higher level of the expansion text span, list is the most frequent relation because the applicants present various arguments with the same status. Contrast was the second relation with highest frequency in this same level. Our hypothesis is that the selection of texts of the test influenced the applicants to present positive and negative aspects of the internet as it happened in the initial statement. Within the 15 compositions, 12 had a conclusion. This part was considered a satellite of the span formed by the initial statement and its expansion. The relation held was homonymous. |
id |
UEL-3_580e260f6b43285884761e3bcf2faa6d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18325 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-3 |
network_name_str |
Signum: Estudos da Linguagem |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
RHETORICAL STRUCTURE OF ARGUMENTATIVE ANSWERA estrutura retórica do gênero resposta argumentativaRST. Argumentative answer. Superstructure.RSTresposta argumentativasuperestruturaThe aim of this paper is to describe the rhetorical structure of the argumentative answer genre in a corpus formed by 15 compositions of the winter vestibular of Universidade Estadual de Maringá. The instrument of analysis used in the investigation was RST (Rhetorical Structure Theory). The initial statement was considered the central unit of the argumentative answer. Most of the writers held evidence relation between the central unit (nucleus) and the expansion (satellite). Evidence relation is interpersonal and the aim of the writers is to convince their addressees (in this case the compositions evaluation committee) that their point is correct. Within the initial statement, the relation with higher frequency was contrast. Our hypothesis is that the selection of texts of the test influenced the applicants to present positive and negative aspects of the internet. In the higher level of the expansion text span, list is the most frequent relation because the applicants present various arguments with the same status. Contrast was the second relation with highest frequency in this same level. Our hypothesis is that the selection of texts of the test influenced the applicants to present positive and negative aspects of the internet as it happened in the initial statement. Within the 15 compositions, 12 had a conclusion. This part was considered a satellite of the span formed by the initial statement and its expansion. The relation held was homonymous.Este trabalho tem como objetivo descrever a estrutura retórica do gênero resposta argumentativa em um corpus formado por 15 redações do concurso vestibular de inverno de 2009 da Universidade Estadual de Maringá. O instrumento de análise foi a RST (Rhetorical Structure Theory – Teoria da Estrutura Retórica). Tomou-se a afirmação inicial como porção nuclear da resposta argumentativa. Entre a afirmação inicial e o desenvolvimento (satélite), os candidatos estabeleceram, em sua maioria, relação de evidência, que tem caráter interpessoal, para tentar convencer seu destinatário (a banca de avaliação das redações) de que seu ponto de vista estava correto. No interior da afirmação inicial, a relação que apresentou maior frequência de ocorrência foi a de contraste. Nossa hipótese é que a própria coletânea de textos da prova do vestibular tenha levado os candidatos a apresentar aspectos positivos e aspectos negativos da internet. No nível mais alto da porção textual que funciona como desenvolvimento, a relação mais frequente é a de lista porque os candidatos apresentam vários argumentos de mesmo estatuto. A segunda relação com maior frequência de ocorrência no nível mais alto da porção que funciona como desenvolvimento é a relação de contraste. Assim como ocorreu no interior da afirmação inicial, essa alta frequência pode ser atribuída às informações presentes na coletânea de textos da prova, que apresentavam aspectos positivos e aspectos negativos da internet. Das 15 redações analisadas, 12 apresentaram conclusão. Essa parte foi considerada satélite da porção textual formada pela afirmação inicial mais o desenvolvimento, e a relação que se estabeleceu foi homônima.UEL2014-12-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/signum/article/view/1832510.5433/2237-4876.2014v17n2p193Signum: Estudos da Linguagem; Vol. 17 No. 2 (2014): Volume Atemático; 193-223Signum: Estudos da Linguagem; v. 17 n. 2 (2014): Volume Atemático; 193-2232237-4876reponame:Signum: Estudos da Linguageminstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/signum/article/view/18325/15700http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAntonio, Juliano Desideratodos Santos, Jackline Altoé2022-11-16T18:10:51Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18325Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/signumPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/signum/oai||signum@uel.br2237-48761516-3083opendoar:2022-11-16T18:10:51Signum: Estudos da Linguagem - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
RHETORICAL STRUCTURE OF ARGUMENTATIVE ANSWER A estrutura retórica do gênero resposta argumentativa |
title |
RHETORICAL STRUCTURE OF ARGUMENTATIVE ANSWER |
spellingShingle |
RHETORICAL STRUCTURE OF ARGUMENTATIVE ANSWER Antonio, Juliano Desiderato RST. Argumentative answer. Superstructure. RST resposta argumentativa superestrutura |
title_short |
RHETORICAL STRUCTURE OF ARGUMENTATIVE ANSWER |
title_full |
RHETORICAL STRUCTURE OF ARGUMENTATIVE ANSWER |
title_fullStr |
RHETORICAL STRUCTURE OF ARGUMENTATIVE ANSWER |
title_full_unstemmed |
RHETORICAL STRUCTURE OF ARGUMENTATIVE ANSWER |
title_sort |
RHETORICAL STRUCTURE OF ARGUMENTATIVE ANSWER |
author |
Antonio, Juliano Desiderato |
author_facet |
Antonio, Juliano Desiderato dos Santos, Jackline Altoé |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
dos Santos, Jackline Altoé |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Antonio, Juliano Desiderato dos Santos, Jackline Altoé |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
RST. Argumentative answer. Superstructure. RST resposta argumentativa superestrutura |
topic |
RST. Argumentative answer. Superstructure. RST resposta argumentativa superestrutura |
description |
The aim of this paper is to describe the rhetorical structure of the argumentative answer genre in a corpus formed by 15 compositions of the winter vestibular of Universidade Estadual de Maringá. The instrument of analysis used in the investigation was RST (Rhetorical Structure Theory). The initial statement was considered the central unit of the argumentative answer. Most of the writers held evidence relation between the central unit (nucleus) and the expansion (satellite). Evidence relation is interpersonal and the aim of the writers is to convince their addressees (in this case the compositions evaluation committee) that their point is correct. Within the initial statement, the relation with higher frequency was contrast. Our hypothesis is that the selection of texts of the test influenced the applicants to present positive and negative aspects of the internet. In the higher level of the expansion text span, list is the most frequent relation because the applicants present various arguments with the same status. Contrast was the second relation with highest frequency in this same level. Our hypothesis is that the selection of texts of the test influenced the applicants to present positive and negative aspects of the internet as it happened in the initial statement. Within the 15 compositions, 12 had a conclusion. This part was considered a satellite of the span formed by the initial statement and its expansion. The relation held was homonymous. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-12-26 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/signum/article/view/18325 10.5433/2237-4876.2014v17n2p193 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/signum/article/view/18325 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/2237-4876.2014v17n2p193 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/signum/article/view/18325/15700 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Signum: Estudos da Linguagem; Vol. 17 No. 2 (2014): Volume Atemático; 193-223 Signum: Estudos da Linguagem; v. 17 n. 2 (2014): Volume Atemático; 193-223 2237-4876 reponame:Signum: Estudos da Linguagem instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Signum: Estudos da Linguagem |
collection |
Signum: Estudos da Linguagem |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Signum: Estudos da Linguagem - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||signum@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799305963363106816 |