Lexicology and information: an essay of quantification

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cambraia, César Nardelli
Data de Publicação: 2015
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Entretextos
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextos/article/view/17370
Resumo: This work aims to evaluate the technique of measuring information of a set of texts through its vocabulary. From a theoretical point of view, we adopted concepts of structural lexicology (BIDERMAN, 2001) and functionalism (NEVES, 1997). We collected all texts published about a certain topic on digital version from three journals of Minas Gerais throughout nine months (179 texts) and then we did a quantitative analysis (based on tokens, types and lemmas) and a qualitative analysis (based on the relevance of certain events). As results, we found that: (a) the three journals behaved differently in the treatment of the topic, (b) the level of lemmas is most relevant to quantify differences in the amount of information of a text, (c) the amount of new information in each text analyzed is relatively low (13-15%), (d) periodicals continue to compose digital texts following the logic of printed media, and (e) the quantification of information through lemmas is not a sufficient criterion for identifying relevant information.
id UEL-5_55202a0f7f17072113b6e82a36bb6f58
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/17370
network_acronym_str UEL-5
network_name_str Revista Entretextos
repository_id_str
spelling Lexicology and information: an essay of quantificationLexicologia e informação: um ensaio de quantificaçãoLexicologyPressCorpus linguistics.LexicologiaImprensaLinguística de CorpusThis work aims to evaluate the technique of measuring information of a set of texts through its vocabulary. From a theoretical point of view, we adopted concepts of structural lexicology (BIDERMAN, 2001) and functionalism (NEVES, 1997). We collected all texts published about a certain topic on digital version from three journals of Minas Gerais throughout nine months (179 texts) and then we did a quantitative analysis (based on tokens, types and lemmas) and a qualitative analysis (based on the relevance of certain events). As results, we found that: (a) the three journals behaved differently in the treatment of the topic, (b) the level of lemmas is most relevant to quantify differences in the amount of information of a text, (c) the amount of new information in each text analyzed is relatively low (13-15%), (d) periodicals continue to compose digital texts following the logic of printed media, and (e) the quantification of information through lemmas is not a sufficient criterion for identifying relevant information.Este trabalho tem como objetivo avaliar a técnica de medir informação de um conjunto de textos a partir de seu vocabulário. Do ponto de vista teórico, adotam-se conceitos da lexicologia estrutural (BIDERMAN, 2001) e do funcionalismo (NEVES, 1997). Fez-se uma coleta de todos os textos publicados sobre um determinado tema na versão digital de três periódicos de Minas Gerais por nove meses (179 textos) e em seguida fez-se uma análise quantitativa (baseada em ocorrências de lexias, lexias diferentes e lexemas diferentes) e uma análise qualitativa (baseada na relevância de certos eventos). Como resultado, verificou-se que: (a) os três periódicos se comportaram diferentemente no tratamento do tema, (b) o nível dos lexemas é o mais relevante para quantificar diferença no volume de informação de um texto, (c) a quantidade de informação nova em cada texto analisado é relativamente baixa (13-15%), (d) os periódicos continuam compondo textos digitais segundo a lógica da mídia impressa, e (e) a quantificação de informação por lexema não se mostrou como critério suficiente para identificação de informação relevante.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2015-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionLinguística de Corpusapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextos/article/view/1737010.5433/1519-5392.2015v15n2p31Entretextos; v. 15 n. 2 (2015); 31-522764-08091519-5392reponame:Revista Entretextosinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextos/article/view/17370/19570Copyright (c) 2015 Entretextosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCambraia, César Nardelli2021-04-19T18:28:50Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/17370Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextosPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextos/oai||entretextos.uel@gmail.com|| ppgel@uel.br|| laudi@uel.br1519-53922764-0809opendoar:2021-04-19T18:28:50Revista Entretextos - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Lexicology and information: an essay of quantification
Lexicologia e informação: um ensaio de quantificação
title Lexicology and information: an essay of quantification
spellingShingle Lexicology and information: an essay of quantification
Cambraia, César Nardelli
Lexicology
Press
Corpus linguistics.
Lexicologia
Imprensa
Linguística de Corpus
title_short Lexicology and information: an essay of quantification
title_full Lexicology and information: an essay of quantification
title_fullStr Lexicology and information: an essay of quantification
title_full_unstemmed Lexicology and information: an essay of quantification
title_sort Lexicology and information: an essay of quantification
author Cambraia, César Nardelli
author_facet Cambraia, César Nardelli
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cambraia, César Nardelli
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Lexicology
Press
Corpus linguistics.
Lexicologia
Imprensa
Linguística de Corpus
topic Lexicology
Press
Corpus linguistics.
Lexicologia
Imprensa
Linguística de Corpus
description This work aims to evaluate the technique of measuring information of a set of texts through its vocabulary. From a theoretical point of view, we adopted concepts of structural lexicology (BIDERMAN, 2001) and functionalism (NEVES, 1997). We collected all texts published about a certain topic on digital version from three journals of Minas Gerais throughout nine months (179 texts) and then we did a quantitative analysis (based on tokens, types and lemmas) and a qualitative analysis (based on the relevance of certain events). As results, we found that: (a) the three journals behaved differently in the treatment of the topic, (b) the level of lemmas is most relevant to quantify differences in the amount of information of a text, (c) the amount of new information in each text analyzed is relatively low (13-15%), (d) periodicals continue to compose digital texts following the logic of printed media, and (e) the quantification of information through lemmas is not a sufficient criterion for identifying relevant information.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-08-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Linguística de Corpus
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextos/article/view/17370
10.5433/1519-5392.2015v15n2p31
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextos/article/view/17370
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1519-5392.2015v15n2p31
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextos/article/view/17370/19570
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Entretextos
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Entretextos
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Entretextos; v. 15 n. 2 (2015); 31-52
2764-0809
1519-5392
reponame:Revista Entretextos
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Revista Entretextos
collection Revista Entretextos
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Entretextos - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||entretextos.uel@gmail.com|| ppgel@uel.br|| laudi@uel.br
_version_ 1799315388415082496