Referencing and polemic argumentation in an opinion article about the decriminalization of drugs in Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rocha, Francisco Felipe de Oliveira
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Souza, Thales Moises Alves de, Bezerra, Lidiane de Morais Diógenes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Entretextos
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextos/article/view/49333
Resumo: In this work, we aim to investigate the relationship between referencing and polemical argumentation in an opinion article about the decriminalization of drugs in Brazil. To this end, we are theoretically affiliated with Textual Linguistics and, more specifically, with the dialogue that has been established between it and the Theory of Argumentation in Discourse, by Amossy (2020). We approach this dialogue based mainly on Macedo (2018) and Cavalcante et al. (2020), which demonstrate how argumentation reveals itself textually. We also consider the postulates of Amossy (2017) regarding the modality polemic in argumentation that appears in the opinion article analyzed, as well as the regulations of this genre, based on the study by Rodrigues (2001). Referencing, the textualization strategy we analyzed, is supported by studies such as those by Mondada and Dubois (2003) and Custódio Filho (2011). The analysis revealed that the construction of conflicting points of view that characterize the modality polemic goes directly through the way in which the referents are (re)elaborated in the opinion article analyzed. It was demonstrated, therefore, that referencing is an important argumentative strategy and, more broadly, that the dialogue between Textual Linguistics and the Theory of Argumentation in Discourse is quite fruitful.
id UEL-5_fc8e93cd962d49a723cf41dbf38af78a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/49333
network_acronym_str UEL-5
network_name_str Revista Entretextos
repository_id_str
spelling Referencing and polemic argumentation in an opinion article about the decriminalization of drugs in BrazilReferenciación y argumentación polémica en artículo de opinión sobre la despenalización de las drogas en BrasilReferenciação e argumentação polêmica em artigo de opinião sobre a descriminalização das drogas no BrasilReferencingArgumentationOpinion articleReferenciaciónArgumentatiónArtículo de opiniónReferenciaçãoArgumentaçãoArtigo de opiniãoIn this work, we aim to investigate the relationship between referencing and polemical argumentation in an opinion article about the decriminalization of drugs in Brazil. To this end, we are theoretically affiliated with Textual Linguistics and, more specifically, with the dialogue that has been established between it and the Theory of Argumentation in Discourse, by Amossy (2020). We approach this dialogue based mainly on Macedo (2018) and Cavalcante et al. (2020), which demonstrate how argumentation reveals itself textually. We also consider the postulates of Amossy (2017) regarding the modality polemic in argumentation that appears in the opinion article analyzed, as well as the regulations of this genre, based on the study by Rodrigues (2001). Referencing, the textualization strategy we analyzed, is supported by studies such as those by Mondada and Dubois (2003) and Custódio Filho (2011). The analysis revealed that the construction of conflicting points of view that characterize the modality polemic goes directly through the way in which the referents are (re)elaborated in the opinion article analyzed. It was demonstrated, therefore, that referencing is an important argumentative strategy and, more broadly, that the dialogue between Textual Linguistics and the Theory of Argumentation in Discourse is quite fruitful.En este trabajo, nuestro objetivo es investigar la relación entre referenciación y argumentación polémica en un artículo de opinión acerca de la despenalización de las drogas en Brasil. Para eso, nos vinculamos teóricamente a la Linguística Textual y, más específicamente, al diálogo que ha sido establecido entre ella y la Teoría de la Argumentación en el Discurso, de Amossy (2020). Dialogamos con base en Macedo (2018) y Cavalcante et al. (2020), que demuestran cómo la argumentación se revela textualmente. Consideramos los postulados de Amossy (2017) en cuanto a la modalidad de argumentación que se configura en el artículo de opinión analizado, así como las regulaciones de esse género, a partir del estudio de Rodrigues (2001). La referenciación, estrategia de textualización por nosotros analizada, se sustenta en estudios como el de Mondada y Dubois (2003) y el de Custódio Filho (2011). Observamos que la construcción de los puntos de vista conflictivos que caracterizan la modalidad polémica pasa directamente por el modo como los referentes son reelaborados en el texto analizado. Se demonstró, así, que la referenciación es una importante estrategia argumentativa y que el diálogo entre la Linguística Textual y la Teoría de la Argumentación en el Discurso es bastante fructífero.Neste trabalho, objetivamos investigar a relação entre a referenciação e a argumentação polêmica em um artigo de opinião sobre a descriminalização das drogas no Brasil. Para isso, filiamo-nos teoricamente à Linguística Textual e, mais especificamente, ao diálogo que tem sido estabelecido entre ela e a Teoria da Argumentação no Discurso, de Amossy (2020). Abordamos esse diálogo com base, principalmente, em Macedo (2018) e Cavalcante et al. (2020), que demonstram como a argumentação se revela textualmente. Consideramos, ainda, os postulados de Amossy (2017) quanto à modalidade polêmica de argumentação que se configura no artigo de opinião analisado, assim como as regulações desse gênero, a partir do estudo de Rodrigues (2001). A referenciação, estratégia de textualização por nós analisada, sustenta-se em estudos como o de Mondada e Dubois (2003) e o de Custódio Filho (2011). A análise revelou que a construção dos pontos de vista conflitantes que caracterizam a modalidade polêmica passa diretamente pelo modo como os referentes são (re)elaborados no artigo de opinião analisado. Demonstrou-se, assim, que a referenciação é uma importante estratégia argumentativa e, de modo mais amplo, que o diálogo entre a Linguística Textual e a Teoria da Argumentação no Discurso é bastante frutífero.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2023-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextos/article/view/4933310.5433/1519-5392.2023v23n4p224-245Entretextos; v. 23 n. 4 (2023): Atem´ático ; 224-2452764-08091519-5392reponame:Revista Entretextosinstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextos/article/view/49333/50040Copyright (c) 2024 Francisco Felipe de Oliveira Rocha, Thales Moises Alves de Souza, Lidiane de Morais Diógenes Bezerrahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRocha, Francisco Felipe de OliveiraSouza, Thales Moises Alves deBezerra, Lidiane de Morais Diógenes2024-02-23T15:53:36Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/49333Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextosPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextos/oai||entretextos.uel@gmail.com|| ppgel@uel.br|| laudi@uel.br1519-53922764-0809opendoar:2024-02-23T15:53:36Revista Entretextos - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Referencing and polemic argumentation in an opinion article about the decriminalization of drugs in Brazil
Referenciación y argumentación polémica en artículo de opinión sobre la despenalización de las drogas en Brasil
Referenciação e argumentação polêmica em artigo de opinião sobre a descriminalização das drogas no Brasil
title Referencing and polemic argumentation in an opinion article about the decriminalization of drugs in Brazil
spellingShingle Referencing and polemic argumentation in an opinion article about the decriminalization of drugs in Brazil
Rocha, Francisco Felipe de Oliveira
Referencing
Argumentation
Opinion article
Referenciación
Argumentatión
Artículo de opinión
Referenciação
Argumentação
Artigo de opinião
title_short Referencing and polemic argumentation in an opinion article about the decriminalization of drugs in Brazil
title_full Referencing and polemic argumentation in an opinion article about the decriminalization of drugs in Brazil
title_fullStr Referencing and polemic argumentation in an opinion article about the decriminalization of drugs in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Referencing and polemic argumentation in an opinion article about the decriminalization of drugs in Brazil
title_sort Referencing and polemic argumentation in an opinion article about the decriminalization of drugs in Brazil
author Rocha, Francisco Felipe de Oliveira
author_facet Rocha, Francisco Felipe de Oliveira
Souza, Thales Moises Alves de
Bezerra, Lidiane de Morais Diógenes
author_role author
author2 Souza, Thales Moises Alves de
Bezerra, Lidiane de Morais Diógenes
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rocha, Francisco Felipe de Oliveira
Souza, Thales Moises Alves de
Bezerra, Lidiane de Morais Diógenes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Referencing
Argumentation
Opinion article
Referenciación
Argumentatión
Artículo de opinión
Referenciação
Argumentação
Artigo de opinião
topic Referencing
Argumentation
Opinion article
Referenciación
Argumentatión
Artículo de opinión
Referenciação
Argumentação
Artigo de opinião
description In this work, we aim to investigate the relationship between referencing and polemical argumentation in an opinion article about the decriminalization of drugs in Brazil. To this end, we are theoretically affiliated with Textual Linguistics and, more specifically, with the dialogue that has been established between it and the Theory of Argumentation in Discourse, by Amossy (2020). We approach this dialogue based mainly on Macedo (2018) and Cavalcante et al. (2020), which demonstrate how argumentation reveals itself textually. We also consider the postulates of Amossy (2017) regarding the modality polemic in argumentation that appears in the opinion article analyzed, as well as the regulations of this genre, based on the study by Rodrigues (2001). Referencing, the textualization strategy we analyzed, is supported by studies such as those by Mondada and Dubois (2003) and Custódio Filho (2011). The analysis revealed that the construction of conflicting points of view that characterize the modality polemic goes directly through the way in which the referents are (re)elaborated in the opinion article analyzed. It was demonstrated, therefore, that referencing is an important argumentative strategy and, more broadly, that the dialogue between Textual Linguistics and the Theory of Argumentation in Discourse is quite fruitful.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-12-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextos/article/view/49333
10.5433/1519-5392.2023v23n4p224-245
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextos/article/view/49333
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1519-5392.2023v23n4p224-245
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/entretextos/article/view/49333/50040
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Entretextos; v. 23 n. 4 (2023): Atem´ático ; 224-245
2764-0809
1519-5392
reponame:Revista Entretextos
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Revista Entretextos
collection Revista Entretextos
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Entretextos - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||entretextos.uel@gmail.com|| ppgel@uel.br|| laudi@uel.br
_version_ 1799315390173544448

Registros relacionados