Democracy and hatred based conflicts: the quest for a peaceful coexistence with the use of community-based mediation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carcará, Thiago Anastácio
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Maia, Clarissa Fonseca
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Scientia Iuris (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/29524
Resumo: This study analyzes democracy and the many conflicts that arise from hatred, and questions whether community mediation is a viable solution for a peaceful coexistence. Using literature review, this paper examines democracy as a principle and as a political structure – with the perspective of freedom of expression and the view of Souma Berlin (1981). Furthermore, positive liberty is seen here not only as a necessary requirement of citizenship, but as a liberty of the Social State, as it is a guarantor of fundamental rights and an instigator for the encouragement of active citizenship. Even though hate speech is also a freedom of expression, it has negative effects on democracy even if public space is seen as an environment for tolerance and knowledge based on truth. Therefore, mediation can be a useful instrument for conflict resolution, as it can empower citizens and provide the necessary moral and legal awareness for communities. In this way, individuals pertaining to different regions or communities can resolve their own conflicts with this instrument; thusly, governing and helping themselves, as the State promotes and fosters positive speech and active citizenship.
id UEL-6_1682c53cc62925c4606db4ea5b7dc65f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/29524
network_acronym_str UEL-6
network_name_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Democracy and hatred based conflicts: the quest for a peaceful coexistence with the use of community-based mediationDemocracia e conflitos de ódio: busca pela convivência pacífica através da mediação comunitáriaDemocraciaDiscurso do ódioMediação ComunitáriaTolerância.This study analyzes democracy and the many conflicts that arise from hatred, and questions whether community mediation is a viable solution for a peaceful coexistence. Using literature review, this paper examines democracy as a principle and as a political structure – with the perspective of freedom of expression and the view of Souma Berlin (1981). Furthermore, positive liberty is seen here not only as a necessary requirement of citizenship, but as a liberty of the Social State, as it is a guarantor of fundamental rights and an instigator for the encouragement of active citizenship. Even though hate speech is also a freedom of expression, it has negative effects on democracy even if public space is seen as an environment for tolerance and knowledge based on truth. Therefore, mediation can be a useful instrument for conflict resolution, as it can empower citizens and provide the necessary moral and legal awareness for communities. In this way, individuals pertaining to different regions or communities can resolve their own conflicts with this instrument; thusly, governing and helping themselves, as the State promotes and fosters positive speech and active citizenship.O trabalho pretende analisar a democracia e os conflitos de ódio, verificando a possibilidade de convivência através da mediação comunitária. Utilizando o método de pesquisa bibliográfica, analisa-se a democracia como princípio e como estrutura política, na vertente da liberdade de expressão, através do pensamento de Berlin (1981), galgando a liberdade positiva como necessária no exercício da cidadania, bem como no liberalismo e no Estado Social, não apenas tendo o Estado a função de garantidor dos direitos fundamentais, mas como incentivador da cidadania ativa, disseminando o poder da autotutela de forma ampla e uniforme. Verifica-se ainda o discurso do ódio como manifestação do pensamento que contamina a democracia e deve ser trabalhado de forma que se possa encontrar, no espaço público de ideias, ambiente de tolerância e de conhecimento da verdade. Alçando a Mediação, como instrumento a resolução de conflitos, verifica-se a Mediação Comunitária como meio ideal a empoderar o cidadão e possibilitar a conscientização moral e jurídica de forma comunitária, alcançando os indivíduos membros de uma região ou comunidade que necessidade elidir seus conflitos e possam autogovernar-se no que concerne a solução de seus conflitos de ódio, sendo o Estado um garantidor e incentivador da proatividade e cidadania ativa.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2017-11-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/2952410.5433/2178-8189.2017v21n3p225Scientia Iuris; v. 21 n. 3 (2017); 225-2472178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/29524/22330Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarcará, Thiago AnastácioMaia, Clarissa FonsecaMaia, Clarissa Fonseca2018-01-18T18:48:59Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/29524Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2018-01-18T18:48:59Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Democracy and hatred based conflicts: the quest for a peaceful coexistence with the use of community-based mediation
Democracia e conflitos de ódio: busca pela convivência pacífica através da mediação comunitária
title Democracy and hatred based conflicts: the quest for a peaceful coexistence with the use of community-based mediation
spellingShingle Democracy and hatred based conflicts: the quest for a peaceful coexistence with the use of community-based mediation
Carcará, Thiago Anastácio
Democracia
Discurso do ódio
Mediação Comunitária
Tolerância.
title_short Democracy and hatred based conflicts: the quest for a peaceful coexistence with the use of community-based mediation
title_full Democracy and hatred based conflicts: the quest for a peaceful coexistence with the use of community-based mediation
title_fullStr Democracy and hatred based conflicts: the quest for a peaceful coexistence with the use of community-based mediation
title_full_unstemmed Democracy and hatred based conflicts: the quest for a peaceful coexistence with the use of community-based mediation
title_sort Democracy and hatred based conflicts: the quest for a peaceful coexistence with the use of community-based mediation
author Carcará, Thiago Anastácio
author_facet Carcará, Thiago Anastácio
Maia, Clarissa Fonseca
author_role author
author2 Maia, Clarissa Fonseca
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carcará, Thiago Anastácio
Maia, Clarissa Fonseca
Maia, Clarissa Fonseca
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Democracia
Discurso do ódio
Mediação Comunitária
Tolerância.
topic Democracia
Discurso do ódio
Mediação Comunitária
Tolerância.
description This study analyzes democracy and the many conflicts that arise from hatred, and questions whether community mediation is a viable solution for a peaceful coexistence. Using literature review, this paper examines democracy as a principle and as a political structure – with the perspective of freedom of expression and the view of Souma Berlin (1981). Furthermore, positive liberty is seen here not only as a necessary requirement of citizenship, but as a liberty of the Social State, as it is a guarantor of fundamental rights and an instigator for the encouragement of active citizenship. Even though hate speech is also a freedom of expression, it has negative effects on democracy even if public space is seen as an environment for tolerance and knowledge based on truth. Therefore, mediation can be a useful instrument for conflict resolution, as it can empower citizens and provide the necessary moral and legal awareness for communities. In this way, individuals pertaining to different regions or communities can resolve their own conflicts with this instrument; thusly, governing and helping themselves, as the State promotes and fosters positive speech and active citizenship.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-11-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/29524
10.5433/2178-8189.2017v21n3p225
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/29524
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/2178-8189.2017v21n3p225
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/29524/22330
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris; v. 21 n. 3 (2017); 225-247
2178-8189
1415-6490
reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
collection Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistamdireito@uel.br
_version_ 1799306015188975616

Registros relacionados