Between rules and principles
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Scientia Iuris (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/32416 |
Resumo: | The purpose of this overview is to understand, in a comprehensive way, the problematic of chapter three of Robert Alexy's ‘A Theory of Constitutional Rights’. Thus, it makes a comprehensive approach to the main concepts surrounding the problem of the collision of principles, as well as highlights the main points of the argumentation built in the aforementioned chapter. |
id |
UEL-6_363ed1a253fdfc7ab721084d63252460 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/32416 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-6 |
network_name_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Between rules and principlesEntre regras e pricípiosTeoria Geral do DireitoRegrasPrincípiosColisão entre princípiosThe purpose of this overview is to understand, in a comprehensive way, the problematic of chapter three of Robert Alexy's ‘A Theory of Constitutional Rights’. Thus, it makes a comprehensive approach to the main concepts surrounding the problem of the collision of principles, as well as highlights the main points of the argumentation built in the aforementioned chapter.A presente resenha tem por finalidade compreender, de maneira global, a problemática presente no Capítulo 3 de Teoria dos Direitos Fundamentais, de Robert Alexy. Assim, fez-se uma abordagem compreensiva dos principais conceitos que orbitam à volta do problema da colisão de princípios, além de se destacar os principais pontos da argumentação construída no mencionado Capítulo.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2018-03-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/3241610.5433/2178-8189.2018v22n1p314Scientia Iuris; v. 22 n. 1 (2018); 314-3172178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/32416/23359Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGarcia, Fernando SimõesMeda, Renata Vieira2018-04-04T18:29:49Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/32416Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2018-04-04T18:29:49Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Between rules and principles Entre regras e pricípios |
title |
Between rules and principles |
spellingShingle |
Between rules and principles Garcia, Fernando Simões Teoria Geral do Direito Regras Princípios Colisão entre princípios |
title_short |
Between rules and principles |
title_full |
Between rules and principles |
title_fullStr |
Between rules and principles |
title_full_unstemmed |
Between rules and principles |
title_sort |
Between rules and principles |
author |
Garcia, Fernando Simões |
author_facet |
Garcia, Fernando Simões Meda, Renata Vieira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Meda, Renata Vieira |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Garcia, Fernando Simões Meda, Renata Vieira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Teoria Geral do Direito Regras Princípios Colisão entre princípios |
topic |
Teoria Geral do Direito Regras Princípios Colisão entre princípios |
description |
The purpose of this overview is to understand, in a comprehensive way, the problematic of chapter three of Robert Alexy's ‘A Theory of Constitutional Rights’. Thus, it makes a comprehensive approach to the main concepts surrounding the problem of the collision of principles, as well as highlights the main points of the argumentation built in the aforementioned chapter. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-03-28 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/32416 10.5433/2178-8189.2018v22n1p314 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/32416 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/2178-8189.2018v22n1p314 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/32416/23359 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris; v. 22 n. 1 (2018); 314-317 2178-8189 1415-6490 reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
collection |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistamdireito@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306015240355840 |