The use of arbitration for investment contracts in brazil: advantages over the judicial procedure

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nunes, Danilo Henrique
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Netto, Carlos Eduardo Montes, Ferreira, Olavo Augusto Vianna Alves
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Scientia Iuris (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/42389
Resumo: Recently, there has been a significant increase in the number of investors and in money invested in financial investments around the world, including in Brazil, justifying the study of arbitration as an adequate way to solve the conflicts that will occur, considering that justice always the status was criticized, especially due to the delay in solving the cases, which can create an environment of insecurity for attracting new investments. In this sense, this article aims to analyze the possible advantages of using arbitration as an appropriate form of dispute resolution in comparison with state justice. Seeking to achieve this goal, a literature review and a data survey involving the phenomena related to the topic were carried out, using the hypothetical-deductive method. In the end, the results showed that arbitration is a more adequate mechanism for the realization of investors' rights, presenting itself as more beneficial than the judicial process.
id UEL-6_39be9e45ef38350fe04d82dc215012ce
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/42389
network_acronym_str UEL-6
network_name_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The use of arbitration for investment contracts in brazil: advantages over the judicial procedureA utilização da arbitragem para os contratos de investimento no Brasil: vantagens em relação ao procedimento judicialAdvantages of arbitrationInvestmentsDispute resolutionArbitragem de investimentoSolução de controvérsiasVantagensRecently, there has been a significant increase in the number of investors and in money invested in financial investments around the world, including in Brazil, justifying the study of arbitration as an adequate way to solve the conflicts that will occur, considering that justice always the status was criticized, especially due to the delay in solving the cases, which can create an environment of insecurity for attracting new investments. In this sense, this article aims to analyze the possible advantages of using arbitration as an appropriate form of dispute resolution in comparison with state justice. Seeking to achieve this goal, a literature review and a data survey involving the phenomena related to the topic were carried out, using the hypothetical-deductive method. In the end, the results showed that arbitration is a more adequate mechanism for the realization of investors' rights, presenting itself as more beneficial than the judicial process.Nos últimos tempos, tem-se observado expressivo aumento no número de investidores e de dinheiro investido em aplicações financeiras ao redor do mundo, inclusive no Brasil, justificando o estudo da arbitragem como forma adequada de resolução dos conflitos que irão surgir, considerando que a justiça estatal sempre foi alvo de críticas, especialmente pela demora na solução dos casos que lhe são submetidos, o que pode gerar um ambiente de insegurança para a atração de novos investimentos. Neste sentido, o presente artigo tem por objeto analisar as vantagens da arbitragem como forma adequada de resolução de controvérsias envolvendo investimentos em comparação com a justiça estatal. Buscando alcançar esse objetivo, realizou-se uma revisão de literatura e um levantamento de dados envolvendo os fenômenos relacionados ao tema, utilizando-se do método hipotético-dedutivo. Ao final, os resultados apontaram que a arbitragem constitui um mecanismo mais adequado para a efetivação dos direitos dos investidores, apresentando-se como mais benéfica do que o processo judicial.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2021-11-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4238910.5433/2178-8189.2021v25n3p71Scientia Iuris; v. 25 n. 3 (2021); 71-912178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/42389/30637Copyright (c) 2021 Scientia Iurishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNunes, Danilo HenriqueNetto, Carlos Eduardo MontesFerreira, Olavo Augusto Vianna Alves2023-01-17T19:44:41Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/42389Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2023-01-17T19:44:41Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The use of arbitration for investment contracts in brazil: advantages over the judicial procedure
A utilização da arbitragem para os contratos de investimento no Brasil: vantagens em relação ao procedimento judicial
title The use of arbitration for investment contracts in brazil: advantages over the judicial procedure
spellingShingle The use of arbitration for investment contracts in brazil: advantages over the judicial procedure
Nunes, Danilo Henrique
Advantages of arbitration
Investments
Dispute resolution
Arbitragem de investimento
Solução de controvérsias
Vantagens
title_short The use of arbitration for investment contracts in brazil: advantages over the judicial procedure
title_full The use of arbitration for investment contracts in brazil: advantages over the judicial procedure
title_fullStr The use of arbitration for investment contracts in brazil: advantages over the judicial procedure
title_full_unstemmed The use of arbitration for investment contracts in brazil: advantages over the judicial procedure
title_sort The use of arbitration for investment contracts in brazil: advantages over the judicial procedure
author Nunes, Danilo Henrique
author_facet Nunes, Danilo Henrique
Netto, Carlos Eduardo Montes
Ferreira, Olavo Augusto Vianna Alves
author_role author
author2 Netto, Carlos Eduardo Montes
Ferreira, Olavo Augusto Vianna Alves
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nunes, Danilo Henrique
Netto, Carlos Eduardo Montes
Ferreira, Olavo Augusto Vianna Alves
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Advantages of arbitration
Investments
Dispute resolution
Arbitragem de investimento
Solução de controvérsias
Vantagens
topic Advantages of arbitration
Investments
Dispute resolution
Arbitragem de investimento
Solução de controvérsias
Vantagens
description Recently, there has been a significant increase in the number of investors and in money invested in financial investments around the world, including in Brazil, justifying the study of arbitration as an adequate way to solve the conflicts that will occur, considering that justice always the status was criticized, especially due to the delay in solving the cases, which can create an environment of insecurity for attracting new investments. In this sense, this article aims to analyze the possible advantages of using arbitration as an appropriate form of dispute resolution in comparison with state justice. Seeking to achieve this goal, a literature review and a data survey involving the phenomena related to the topic were carried out, using the hypothetical-deductive method. In the end, the results showed that arbitration is a more adequate mechanism for the realization of investors' rights, presenting itself as more beneficial than the judicial process.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-11-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/42389
10.5433/2178-8189.2021v25n3p71
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/42389
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/2178-8189.2021v25n3p71
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/42389/30637
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Scientia Iuris
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Scientia Iuris
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris; v. 25 n. 3 (2021); 71-91
2178-8189
1415-6490
reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
collection Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistamdireito@uel.br
_version_ 1799306016158908416

Registros relacionados