Procedure flexibilization through transport of processual techniques and its legal bases: implementation by compulsory judicial adequacy or through conventional means?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Scientia Iuris (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/43276 |
Resumo: | The present study aims to elucidate the legal foundations that indicate the possibility of free transit of special techniques between procedures and based on such findings, examines whether the transport could be effective from the so-called judicial adequacy of the procedure, in a compulsory manner. Its objective is to also investigate whether the transit can be carried out by conventional means. It is based on the premise that the CPC/2015 presents flexible procedure and is susceptible to better adaptation to continuous social changes; this adaptation, however, should occur with legal and constitutional support, in addition to submiting to criteria such as the promotion of greater procedural effectiveness. The study is based on bibliographical research and is divided into three main sections. It starts with the verification of the importance in the fundamental rules of the CPC/2015 for the understanding that the system structured by it is flexible. Then, it analyzes the procedural legal business, its subjects, and limits and, finally, it investigates the transit of procedural techniques and the possibility of its implementation from the judicial and negotiating adjustments of the procedure, concluding by the preponderance of the negotiating way, including those proposed by the judge himself, as part of the agreement. |
id |
UEL-6_4179b130d5429ee65b4038e6a99f44d0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/43276 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-6 |
network_name_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Procedure flexibilization through transport of processual techniques and its legal bases: implementation by compulsory judicial adequacy or through conventional means?Flexibilização do procedimento a partir do trânsito de técnicas processuais e seus fundamentos: implementação por adequação judicial compulsória ou pela via convencional?procedural flexibilitytransit of procedural techniquesprocedural negotiationadequacy of the procedure.Flexibilização procedimentalTrânsito de técnicas processuaisNegócios Jurídicos ProcessuaisAdequação do procedimentoThe present study aims to elucidate the legal foundations that indicate the possibility of free transit of special techniques between procedures and based on such findings, examines whether the transport could be effective from the so-called judicial adequacy of the procedure, in a compulsory manner. Its objective is to also investigate whether the transit can be carried out by conventional means. It is based on the premise that the CPC/2015 presents flexible procedure and is susceptible to better adaptation to continuous social changes; this adaptation, however, should occur with legal and constitutional support, in addition to submiting to criteria such as the promotion of greater procedural effectiveness. The study is based on bibliographical research and is divided into three main sections. It starts with the verification of the importance in the fundamental rules of the CPC/2015 for the understanding that the system structured by it is flexible. Then, it analyzes the procedural legal business, its subjects, and limits and, finally, it investigates the transit of procedural techniques and the possibility of its implementation from the judicial and negotiating adjustments of the procedure, concluding by the preponderance of the negotiating way, including those proposed by the judge himself, as part of the agreement.O presente estudo objetiva elucidar os fundamentos legais que indicam a possibilidade do livre trânsito de técnicas especiais entre os procedimentos e, a partir de tais constatações, examinar se o transporte poderia se efetivar a partir da denominada adequação judicial do procedimento, de forma compulsória. Objetiva-se investigar, outrossim, se o referido trânsito é passível de efetivação pela via convencional. Parte-se da premissa de que o CPC/2015 apresenta procedimento flexível e susceptível de melhor adaptação às contínuas transformações sociais; referida adaptação, no entanto, deve ocorrer com respaldo legal e constitucional, além de se submeter a critérios como a promoção de maior efetividade processual. Vale-se de pesquisa bibliográfica, com divisão do estudo em três seções primordiais. Inicia-se com a verificação da importância nas normas fundamentais do CPC/2015 para a compreensão de que o sistema por ele estruturado é flexível. Em seguida, analisam-se os negócios jurídicos processuais, seus sujeitos e limites e, por fim, parte-se à investigação do trânsito de técnicas processuais e a possibilidade de sua implementação a partir das adequações judicial e negocial do procedimento, concluindo-se pela preponderância da via negocial, inclusive proposta pelo próprio magistrado, como parte da avença.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2021-07-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4327610.5433/2178-8189.2021v25n2p187Scientia Iuris; v. 25 n. 2 (2021); 187-2042178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/43276/30019Copyright (c) 2021 Scientia Iurishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBufulin, Augusto PassamaniVilarinho, Tiago Aguiar2023-01-17T19:41:03Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/43276Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2023-01-17T19:41:03Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Procedure flexibilization through transport of processual techniques and its legal bases: implementation by compulsory judicial adequacy or through conventional means? Flexibilização do procedimento a partir do trânsito de técnicas processuais e seus fundamentos: implementação por adequação judicial compulsória ou pela via convencional? |
title |
Procedure flexibilization through transport of processual techniques and its legal bases: implementation by compulsory judicial adequacy or through conventional means? |
spellingShingle |
Procedure flexibilization through transport of processual techniques and its legal bases: implementation by compulsory judicial adequacy or through conventional means? Bufulin, Augusto Passamani procedural flexibility transit of procedural techniques procedural negotiation adequacy of the procedure. Flexibilização procedimental Trânsito de técnicas processuais Negócios Jurídicos Processuais Adequação do procedimento |
title_short |
Procedure flexibilization through transport of processual techniques and its legal bases: implementation by compulsory judicial adequacy or through conventional means? |
title_full |
Procedure flexibilization through transport of processual techniques and its legal bases: implementation by compulsory judicial adequacy or through conventional means? |
title_fullStr |
Procedure flexibilization through transport of processual techniques and its legal bases: implementation by compulsory judicial adequacy or through conventional means? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Procedure flexibilization through transport of processual techniques and its legal bases: implementation by compulsory judicial adequacy or through conventional means? |
title_sort |
Procedure flexibilization through transport of processual techniques and its legal bases: implementation by compulsory judicial adequacy or through conventional means? |
author |
Bufulin, Augusto Passamani |
author_facet |
Bufulin, Augusto Passamani Vilarinho, Tiago Aguiar |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Vilarinho, Tiago Aguiar |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bufulin, Augusto Passamani Vilarinho, Tiago Aguiar |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
procedural flexibility transit of procedural techniques procedural negotiation adequacy of the procedure. Flexibilização procedimental Trânsito de técnicas processuais Negócios Jurídicos Processuais Adequação do procedimento |
topic |
procedural flexibility transit of procedural techniques procedural negotiation adequacy of the procedure. Flexibilização procedimental Trânsito de técnicas processuais Negócios Jurídicos Processuais Adequação do procedimento |
description |
The present study aims to elucidate the legal foundations that indicate the possibility of free transit of special techniques between procedures and based on such findings, examines whether the transport could be effective from the so-called judicial adequacy of the procedure, in a compulsory manner. Its objective is to also investigate whether the transit can be carried out by conventional means. It is based on the premise that the CPC/2015 presents flexible procedure and is susceptible to better adaptation to continuous social changes; this adaptation, however, should occur with legal and constitutional support, in addition to submiting to criteria such as the promotion of greater procedural effectiveness. The study is based on bibliographical research and is divided into three main sections. It starts with the verification of the importance in the fundamental rules of the CPC/2015 for the understanding that the system structured by it is flexible. Then, it analyzes the procedural legal business, its subjects, and limits and, finally, it investigates the transit of procedural techniques and the possibility of its implementation from the judicial and negotiating adjustments of the procedure, concluding by the preponderance of the negotiating way, including those proposed by the judge himself, as part of the agreement. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-07-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/43276 10.5433/2178-8189.2021v25n2p187 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/43276 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/2178-8189.2021v25n2p187 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/43276/30019 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Scientia Iuris https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Scientia Iuris https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris; v. 25 n. 2 (2021); 187-204 2178-8189 1415-6490 reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
collection |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistamdireito@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306016191414273 |