Civil disobedience and (in)efficiency: an analysis of the indigenous movement against PEC n. 215/2000

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Monteiro, Michelle Alves
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Santos, Luana Marina dos, Squeff, Tatiana de A. F. R. Cardoso
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Scientia Iuris (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/43008
Resumo: The objective of this paper is to encourage reflection on the real conditions of civil disobedience acts in contemporary society, as it may promote an effective confrontation with undemocratic legislative production and institutional practices, especially regarding judicial action as a limiting factor on the right to manifestation. To this end, we will examine political movements organized by various indigenous ethnic groups that, intending to protect their original rights to their lands, which are constitutionally guaranteed in view of their intrinsic nature, acted against one of the first votes of Brazilian Constitutional Amendment Proposal (PEC) n. 215. Regarding our methodological process, this research utilized deductive reasoning and its objectives is exploratory because it examines concepts of the State, democracy and civil disobedience, in addition to finding out whether their application to indigenous movements and, therefore, in defense of their fundamental rights, would be feasible, especially in view of the judicial action that has been limiting the right to manifestation.
id UEL-6_8f1249b069aed599c128cbfc17cb25bb
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/43008
network_acronym_str UEL-6
network_name_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Civil disobedience and (in)efficiency: an analysis of the indigenous movement against PEC n. 215/2000Desobediência civil e (in)eficácia: uma análise do movimento indígena contra a PEC n. 215/2000Civil disobedienceIndigenous peopleConstitutional lawPEC 215Desobediência civilPovos IndígenasDireito ConstitucionalPEC 215The objective of this paper is to encourage reflection on the real conditions of civil disobedience acts in contemporary society, as it may promote an effective confrontation with undemocratic legislative production and institutional practices, especially regarding judicial action as a limiting factor on the right to manifestation. To this end, we will examine political movements organized by various indigenous ethnic groups that, intending to protect their original rights to their lands, which are constitutionally guaranteed in view of their intrinsic nature, acted against one of the first votes of Brazilian Constitutional Amendment Proposal (PEC) n. 215. Regarding our methodological process, this research utilized deductive reasoning and its objectives is exploratory because it examines concepts of the State, democracy and civil disobedience, in addition to finding out whether their application to indigenous movements and, therefore, in defense of their fundamental rights, would be feasible, especially in view of the judicial action that has been limiting the right to manifestation.Esta pesquisa tem como objetivo central fomentar uma reflexão sobre as reais condições para a realização de atos de desobediência civil na sociedade contemporânea, com intuito de promover um enfrentamento efetivo à produção legislativa e às práticas institucionais não democráticas, especialmente no que tange à atuação judicial como limitadora do direito de manifestação. Para tanto, tomar-se-á como base o movimento político organizado por diversas etnias indígenas que, pretendendo proteger seus direitos originários às terras, os quais são garantidos constitucionalmente haja vista a sua intrinsecalidade, atuaram contra uma das primeiras votações da Proposta de Emenda Constitucional (PEC) n. 215. No que tange os aspectos metodológicos utilizados para a construção desta pesquisa, salienta-se que o método de abordagem empregado neste trabalho é o dedutivo e, quanto aos objetivos, o modelo exploratório, pois, partindo dos conceitos de Estado, democracia e desobediência civil, pretende-se descobrir se a sua aplicação aos movimentos indígenas e, logo, em defesa de seus direitos fundamentais, seria factível, especialmente diante da atuação judicial que vem limitando o direito de manifestação.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2021-03-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4300810.5433/2178-8189.2021v25n1p144Scientia Iuris; v. 25 n. 1 (2021); 144-1622178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/43008/29342Copyright (c) 2021 Scientia Iurisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMonteiro, Michelle AlvesSantos, Luana Marina dosSqueff, Tatiana de A. F. R. Cardoso2021-04-09T12:51:39Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/43008Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2021-04-09T12:51:39Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Civil disobedience and (in)efficiency: an analysis of the indigenous movement against PEC n. 215/2000
Desobediência civil e (in)eficácia: uma análise do movimento indígena contra a PEC n. 215/2000
title Civil disobedience and (in)efficiency: an analysis of the indigenous movement against PEC n. 215/2000
spellingShingle Civil disobedience and (in)efficiency: an analysis of the indigenous movement against PEC n. 215/2000
Monteiro, Michelle Alves
Civil disobedience
Indigenous people
Constitutional law
PEC 215
Desobediência civil
Povos Indígenas
Direito Constitucional
PEC 215
title_short Civil disobedience and (in)efficiency: an analysis of the indigenous movement against PEC n. 215/2000
title_full Civil disobedience and (in)efficiency: an analysis of the indigenous movement against PEC n. 215/2000
title_fullStr Civil disobedience and (in)efficiency: an analysis of the indigenous movement against PEC n. 215/2000
title_full_unstemmed Civil disobedience and (in)efficiency: an analysis of the indigenous movement against PEC n. 215/2000
title_sort Civil disobedience and (in)efficiency: an analysis of the indigenous movement against PEC n. 215/2000
author Monteiro, Michelle Alves
author_facet Monteiro, Michelle Alves
Santos, Luana Marina dos
Squeff, Tatiana de A. F. R. Cardoso
author_role author
author2 Santos, Luana Marina dos
Squeff, Tatiana de A. F. R. Cardoso
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Monteiro, Michelle Alves
Santos, Luana Marina dos
Squeff, Tatiana de A. F. R. Cardoso
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Civil disobedience
Indigenous people
Constitutional law
PEC 215
Desobediência civil
Povos Indígenas
Direito Constitucional
PEC 215
topic Civil disobedience
Indigenous people
Constitutional law
PEC 215
Desobediência civil
Povos Indígenas
Direito Constitucional
PEC 215
description The objective of this paper is to encourage reflection on the real conditions of civil disobedience acts in contemporary society, as it may promote an effective confrontation with undemocratic legislative production and institutional practices, especially regarding judicial action as a limiting factor on the right to manifestation. To this end, we will examine political movements organized by various indigenous ethnic groups that, intending to protect their original rights to their lands, which are constitutionally guaranteed in view of their intrinsic nature, acted against one of the first votes of Brazilian Constitutional Amendment Proposal (PEC) n. 215. Regarding our methodological process, this research utilized deductive reasoning and its objectives is exploratory because it examines concepts of the State, democracy and civil disobedience, in addition to finding out whether their application to indigenous movements and, therefore, in defense of their fundamental rights, would be feasible, especially in view of the judicial action that has been limiting the right to manifestation.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-03-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/43008
10.5433/2178-8189.2021v25n1p144
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/43008
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/2178-8189.2021v25n1p144
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/43008/29342
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Scientia Iuris
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Scientia Iuris
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris; v. 25 n. 1 (2021); 144-162
2178-8189
1415-6490
reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
collection Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistamdireito@uel.br
_version_ 1799306016180928512

Registros relacionados