Validity control of the cross default clause in brazilian legal system
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Scientia Iuris (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/44618 |
Resumo: | The article addresses the figure of the cross default clause, which is widely practiced in the international scenario and has been increasingly used in internal contracts. In view of the incipient doctrinal discussion and the few jurisprudential precedents, the validity of this clause is analyzed, especially considering that the effect it actually produces is not necessarily the one recommended by it. It is proposed that the examination of its validity consider the disparity that may exist between the parties, as well as the proportionality between its premises and its effects. |
id |
UEL-6_b31c0d41d212d6d61dac1a9aafac1bdb |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/44618 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-6 |
network_name_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Validity control of the cross default clause in brazilian legal systemControle de validade da cláusula cross default no ordenamento jurídico brasileiroInadimplementoAntecipação do vencimentoResolução do contratoInvalidadeDefaultAcelerationTerminationInvalidityThe article addresses the figure of the cross default clause, which is widely practiced in the international scenario and has been increasingly used in internal contracts. In view of the incipient doctrinal discussion and the few jurisprudential precedents, the validity of this clause is analyzed, especially considering that the effect it actually produces is not necessarily the one recommended by it. It is proposed that the examination of its validity consider the disparity that may exist between the parties, as well as the proportionality between its premises and its effects.O artigo aborda a figura da cláusula de cross default , por vezes referida como “inadimplemento cruzado”, que é bastante praticada no cenário internacional e vem sendo cada vez mais utilizada em contratos internos. Diante da incipiente discussão doutrinária e dos poucos precedentes jurisprudenciais, analisa-se a validade dessa cláusula, tendo especialmente em vista que o efeito que ela efetivamente produz não é necessariamente aquele por ela preconizado. Propõe-se que o exame de sua validade leve em conta a disparidade eventualmente existente entre as partes, bem como a proporcionalidade entre seu pressuposto e seus efeitos.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2022-11-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/4461810.5433/2178-8189.2022v26n3p109-121Scientia Iuris; v. 26 n. 3 (2022); 109-1212178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/44618/48344Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurishttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKonder, Carlos Nelson2023-01-13T13:49:58Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/44618Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2023-01-13T13:49:58Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Validity control of the cross default clause in brazilian legal system Controle de validade da cláusula cross default no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro |
title |
Validity control of the cross default clause in brazilian legal system |
spellingShingle |
Validity control of the cross default clause in brazilian legal system Konder, Carlos Nelson Inadimplemento Antecipação do vencimento Resolução do contrato Invalidade Default Aceleration Termination Invalidity |
title_short |
Validity control of the cross default clause in brazilian legal system |
title_full |
Validity control of the cross default clause in brazilian legal system |
title_fullStr |
Validity control of the cross default clause in brazilian legal system |
title_full_unstemmed |
Validity control of the cross default clause in brazilian legal system |
title_sort |
Validity control of the cross default clause in brazilian legal system |
author |
Konder, Carlos Nelson |
author_facet |
Konder, Carlos Nelson |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Konder, Carlos Nelson |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Inadimplemento Antecipação do vencimento Resolução do contrato Invalidade Default Aceleration Termination Invalidity |
topic |
Inadimplemento Antecipação do vencimento Resolução do contrato Invalidade Default Aceleration Termination Invalidity |
description |
The article addresses the figure of the cross default clause, which is widely practiced in the international scenario and has been increasingly used in internal contracts. In view of the incipient doctrinal discussion and the few jurisprudential precedents, the validity of this clause is analyzed, especially considering that the effect it actually produces is not necessarily the one recommended by it. It is proposed that the examination of its validity consider the disparity that may exist between the parties, as well as the proportionality between its premises and its effects. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-11-28 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/44618 10.5433/2178-8189.2022v26n3p109-121 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/44618 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/2178-8189.2022v26n3p109-121 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/44618/48344 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris; v. 26 n. 3 (2022); 109-121 2178-8189 1415-6490 reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
collection |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistamdireito@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306016234405888 |