NORTH AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY IN THE TRADE JURISDICTION OF THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION FROM THE WTO-OSC / DS267 - UPLAND COTTON CASE
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Scientia Iuris (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/33768 |
Resumo: | This paper discusses the international responsibility of the State and therole of international jurisdictions – specifically analyzing the internationalresponsibility of the United States in the commercial jurisdiction of the World TradeOrganization, utilizing the WTO-OSC/DS267, known as the Upland Cotton case. Forthe State, it is inevitable that there will always be conflicts of interest subject tointernationally recognized trade rules. This leads to a situation where internationalorganizations need to implement a harmonization mechanism using decisions basedon the regulation of international trade. Moreover, a State has the obligation to repairdamage caused by disrespecting principles of Public International Law. Furthermore,general principles of international law apply to the WTO and its agreements. In thissense, the relationship of international responsibility in the WTO Dispute SettlementSystem (SSC) transcends party involvement in disputes as it concerns all the WTOmembers.This paper discusses the international responsibility of the State and therole of international jurisdictions – specifically analyzing the internationalresponsibility of the United States in the commercial jurisdiction of the World TradeOrganization, utilizing the WTO-OSC/DS267, known as the Upland Cotton case. Forthe State, it is inevitable that there will always be conflicts of interest subject tointernationally recognized trade rules. This leads to a situation where internationalorganizations need to implement a harmonization mechanism using decisions basedon the regulation of international trade. Moreover, a State has the obligation to repairdamage caused by disrespecting principles of Public International Law. Furthermore,general principles of international law apply to the WTO and its agreements. In thissense, the relationship of international responsibility in the WTO Dispute SettlementSystem (SSC) transcends party involvement in disputes as it concerns all the WTOmembers |
id |
UEL-6_d94c8637721473376fff55e1c1283157 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33768 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-6 |
network_name_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
NORTH AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY IN THE TRADE JURISDICTION OF THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION FROM THE WTO-OSC / DS267 - UPLAND COTTON CASEA responsabilidade internacional norte-americana na jurisdição comercial da Organização Mundial do Comércio a partir do caso WTO-OSC/DS267 - upland cottonWTO. Upland Cotton. International Responsibility. International Jurisdiction.OMCUpland CottonResponsabilidade InternacionalJurisdição Internacional.This paper discusses the international responsibility of the State and therole of international jurisdictions – specifically analyzing the internationalresponsibility of the United States in the commercial jurisdiction of the World TradeOrganization, utilizing the WTO-OSC/DS267, known as the Upland Cotton case. Forthe State, it is inevitable that there will always be conflicts of interest subject tointernationally recognized trade rules. This leads to a situation where internationalorganizations need to implement a harmonization mechanism using decisions basedon the regulation of international trade. Moreover, a State has the obligation to repairdamage caused by disrespecting principles of Public International Law. Furthermore,general principles of international law apply to the WTO and its agreements. In thissense, the relationship of international responsibility in the WTO Dispute SettlementSystem (SSC) transcends party involvement in disputes as it concerns all the WTOmembers.This paper discusses the international responsibility of the State and therole of international jurisdictions – specifically analyzing the internationalresponsibility of the United States in the commercial jurisdiction of the World TradeOrganization, utilizing the WTO-OSC/DS267, known as the Upland Cotton case. Forthe State, it is inevitable that there will always be conflicts of interest subject tointernationally recognized trade rules. This leads to a situation where internationalorganizations need to implement a harmonization mechanism using decisions basedon the regulation of international trade. Moreover, a State has the obligation to repairdamage caused by disrespecting principles of Public International Law. Furthermore,general principles of international law apply to the WTO and its agreements. In thissense, the relationship of international responsibility in the WTO Dispute SettlementSystem (SSC) transcends party involvement in disputes as it concerns all the WTOmembersO presente trabalho tem como pano de fundo das discussões apresentadas, a análise assentada nas reflexões sobre a responsabilidade internacional do Estado e as jurisdições internacionais, recaindo sobre a responsabilidade internacional norte-americana na jurisdição comercial da Organização Mundial do Comércio (OMC), a partir do caso WTO-OSC/DS267 - Upland Cotton. É inevitável afirmar que sempre existirão conflitos de interesses nacionais, sujeitos às regras comerciais reconhecidas internacionalmente, o que leva a necessidade dos organismos internacionais efetivarem um mecanismo de harmonização através da tomada de decisões calcadas na regulamentação do comércio internacional. Considerando que a obrigação que um Estado tem com o outro de reparar o dano que causou está consagrada como um princípio do Direito Internacional Público. Os princípios gerais de direito internacional se aplicam à OMC e a seus acordos. Nesse sentido, a relação de responsabilidade internacional, no Sistema de Soluções de Controvérsia (SSC) da OMC, transcende as partes envolvidas numa disputa, pois diz respeito a todos os membros da OMC.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2019-03-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/3376810.5433/2178-8189.2019v23n1p25Scientia Iuris; v. 23 n. 1 (2019); 25-402178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/33768/25171Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBruno, Flávio Marcelo Rodriguesde Macedo, Paulo Emílio Vauthier BorgesRibeiro, Marilda Rosado de Sá2023-01-17T19:06:13Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33768Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2023-01-17T19:06:13Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
NORTH AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY IN THE TRADE JURISDICTION OF THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION FROM THE WTO-OSC / DS267 - UPLAND COTTON CASE A responsabilidade internacional norte-americana na jurisdição comercial da Organização Mundial do Comércio a partir do caso WTO-OSC/DS267 - upland cotton |
title |
NORTH AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY IN THE TRADE JURISDICTION OF THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION FROM THE WTO-OSC / DS267 - UPLAND COTTON CASE |
spellingShingle |
NORTH AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY IN THE TRADE JURISDICTION OF THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION FROM THE WTO-OSC / DS267 - UPLAND COTTON CASE Bruno, Flávio Marcelo Rodrigues WTO. Upland Cotton. International Responsibility. International Jurisdiction. OMC Upland Cotton Responsabilidade Internacional Jurisdição Internacional. |
title_short |
NORTH AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY IN THE TRADE JURISDICTION OF THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION FROM THE WTO-OSC / DS267 - UPLAND COTTON CASE |
title_full |
NORTH AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY IN THE TRADE JURISDICTION OF THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION FROM THE WTO-OSC / DS267 - UPLAND COTTON CASE |
title_fullStr |
NORTH AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY IN THE TRADE JURISDICTION OF THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION FROM THE WTO-OSC / DS267 - UPLAND COTTON CASE |
title_full_unstemmed |
NORTH AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY IN THE TRADE JURISDICTION OF THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION FROM THE WTO-OSC / DS267 - UPLAND COTTON CASE |
title_sort |
NORTH AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY IN THE TRADE JURISDICTION OF THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION FROM THE WTO-OSC / DS267 - UPLAND COTTON CASE |
author |
Bruno, Flávio Marcelo Rodrigues |
author_facet |
Bruno, Flávio Marcelo Rodrigues de Macedo, Paulo Emílio Vauthier Borges Ribeiro, Marilda Rosado de Sá |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
de Macedo, Paulo Emílio Vauthier Borges Ribeiro, Marilda Rosado de Sá |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bruno, Flávio Marcelo Rodrigues de Macedo, Paulo Emílio Vauthier Borges Ribeiro, Marilda Rosado de Sá |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
WTO. Upland Cotton. International Responsibility. International Jurisdiction. OMC Upland Cotton Responsabilidade Internacional Jurisdição Internacional. |
topic |
WTO. Upland Cotton. International Responsibility. International Jurisdiction. OMC Upland Cotton Responsabilidade Internacional Jurisdição Internacional. |
description |
This paper discusses the international responsibility of the State and therole of international jurisdictions – specifically analyzing the internationalresponsibility of the United States in the commercial jurisdiction of the World TradeOrganization, utilizing the WTO-OSC/DS267, known as the Upland Cotton case. Forthe State, it is inevitable that there will always be conflicts of interest subject tointernationally recognized trade rules. This leads to a situation where internationalorganizations need to implement a harmonization mechanism using decisions basedon the regulation of international trade. Moreover, a State has the obligation to repairdamage caused by disrespecting principles of Public International Law. Furthermore,general principles of international law apply to the WTO and its agreements. In thissense, the relationship of international responsibility in the WTO Dispute SettlementSystem (SSC) transcends party involvement in disputes as it concerns all the WTOmembers.This paper discusses the international responsibility of the State and therole of international jurisdictions – specifically analyzing the internationalresponsibility of the United States in the commercial jurisdiction of the World TradeOrganization, utilizing the WTO-OSC/DS267, known as the Upland Cotton case. Forthe State, it is inevitable that there will always be conflicts of interest subject tointernationally recognized trade rules. This leads to a situation where internationalorganizations need to implement a harmonization mechanism using decisions basedon the regulation of international trade. Moreover, a State has the obligation to repairdamage caused by disrespecting principles of Public International Law. Furthermore,general principles of international law apply to the WTO and its agreements. In thissense, the relationship of international responsibility in the WTO Dispute SettlementSystem (SSC) transcends party involvement in disputes as it concerns all the WTOmembers |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-03-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/33768 10.5433/2178-8189.2019v23n1p25 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/33768 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/2178-8189.2019v23n1p25 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/33768/25171 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris; v. 23 n. 1 (2019); 25-40 2178-8189 1415-6490 reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
collection |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistamdireito@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306015522422784 |