NORTH AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY IN THE TRADE JURISDICTION OF THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION FROM THE WTO-OSC / DS267 - UPLAND COTTON CASE

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bruno, Flávio Marcelo Rodrigues
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: de Macedo, Paulo Emílio Vauthier Borges, Ribeiro, Marilda Rosado de Sá
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Scientia Iuris (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/33768
Resumo: This paper discusses the international responsibility of the State and therole of international jurisdictions – specifically analyzing the internationalresponsibility of the United States in the commercial jurisdiction of the World TradeOrganization, utilizing the WTO-OSC/DS267, known as the Upland Cotton case. Forthe State, it is inevitable that there will always be conflicts of interest subject tointernationally recognized trade rules. This leads to a situation where internationalorganizations need to implement a harmonization mechanism using decisions basedon the regulation of international trade. Moreover, a State has the obligation to repairdamage caused by disrespecting principles of Public International Law. Furthermore,general principles of international law apply to the WTO and its agreements. In thissense, the relationship of international responsibility in the WTO Dispute SettlementSystem (SSC) transcends party involvement in disputes as it concerns all the WTOmembers.This paper discusses the international responsibility of the State and therole of international jurisdictions – specifically analyzing the internationalresponsibility of the United States in the commercial jurisdiction of the World TradeOrganization, utilizing the WTO-OSC/DS267, known as the Upland Cotton case. Forthe State, it is inevitable that there will always be conflicts of interest subject tointernationally recognized trade rules. This leads to a situation where internationalorganizations need to implement a harmonization mechanism using decisions basedon the regulation of international trade. Moreover, a State has the obligation to repairdamage caused by disrespecting principles of Public International Law. Furthermore,general principles of international law apply to the WTO and its agreements. In thissense, the relationship of international responsibility in the WTO Dispute SettlementSystem (SSC) transcends party involvement in disputes as it concerns all the WTOmembers
id UEL-6_d94c8637721473376fff55e1c1283157
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33768
network_acronym_str UEL-6
network_name_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling NORTH AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY IN THE TRADE JURISDICTION OF THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION FROM THE WTO-OSC / DS267 - UPLAND COTTON CASEA responsabilidade internacional norte-americana na jurisdição comercial da Organização Mundial do Comércio a partir do caso WTO-OSC/DS267 - upland cottonWTO. Upland Cotton. International Responsibility. International Jurisdiction.OMCUpland CottonResponsabilidade InternacionalJurisdição Internacional.This paper discusses the international responsibility of the State and therole of international jurisdictions – specifically analyzing the internationalresponsibility of the United States in the commercial jurisdiction of the World TradeOrganization, utilizing the WTO-OSC/DS267, known as the Upland Cotton case. Forthe State, it is inevitable that there will always be conflicts of interest subject tointernationally recognized trade rules. This leads to a situation where internationalorganizations need to implement a harmonization mechanism using decisions basedon the regulation of international trade. Moreover, a State has the obligation to repairdamage caused by disrespecting principles of Public International Law. Furthermore,general principles of international law apply to the WTO and its agreements. In thissense, the relationship of international responsibility in the WTO Dispute SettlementSystem (SSC) transcends party involvement in disputes as it concerns all the WTOmembers.This paper discusses the international responsibility of the State and therole of international jurisdictions – specifically analyzing the internationalresponsibility of the United States in the commercial jurisdiction of the World TradeOrganization, utilizing the WTO-OSC/DS267, known as the Upland Cotton case. Forthe State, it is inevitable that there will always be conflicts of interest subject tointernationally recognized trade rules. This leads to a situation where internationalorganizations need to implement a harmonization mechanism using decisions basedon the regulation of international trade. Moreover, a State has the obligation to repairdamage caused by disrespecting principles of Public International Law. Furthermore,general principles of international law apply to the WTO and its agreements. In thissense, the relationship of international responsibility in the WTO Dispute SettlementSystem (SSC) transcends party involvement in disputes as it concerns all the WTOmembersO presente trabalho tem como pano de fundo das discussões apresentadas, a análise assentada nas reflexões sobre a responsabilidade internacional do Estado e as jurisdições internacionais, recaindo sobre a responsabilidade internacional norte-americana na jurisdição comercial da Organização Mundial do Comércio (OMC), a partir do caso WTO-OSC/DS267 - Upland Cotton. É inevitável afirmar que sempre existirão conflitos de interesses nacionais, sujeitos às regras comerciais reconhecidas internacionalmente, o que leva a necessidade dos organismos internacionais efetivarem um mecanismo de harmonização através da tomada de decisões calcadas na regulamentação do comércio internacional. Considerando que a obrigação que um Estado tem com o outro de reparar o dano que causou está consagrada como um princípio do Direito Internacional Público. Os princípios gerais de direito internacional se aplicam à OMC e a seus acordos. Nesse sentido, a relação de responsabilidade internacional, no Sistema de Soluções de Controvérsia (SSC) da OMC, transcende as partes envolvidas numa disputa, pois diz respeito a todos os membros da OMC.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2019-03-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/3376810.5433/2178-8189.2019v23n1p25Scientia Iuris; v. 23 n. 1 (2019); 25-402178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/33768/25171Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBruno, Flávio Marcelo Rodriguesde Macedo, Paulo Emílio Vauthier BorgesRibeiro, Marilda Rosado de Sá2023-01-17T19:06:13Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33768Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2023-01-17T19:06:13Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv NORTH AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY IN THE TRADE JURISDICTION OF THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION FROM THE WTO-OSC / DS267 - UPLAND COTTON CASE
A responsabilidade internacional norte-americana na jurisdição comercial da Organização Mundial do Comércio a partir do caso WTO-OSC/DS267 - upland cotton
title NORTH AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY IN THE TRADE JURISDICTION OF THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION FROM THE WTO-OSC / DS267 - UPLAND COTTON CASE
spellingShingle NORTH AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY IN THE TRADE JURISDICTION OF THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION FROM THE WTO-OSC / DS267 - UPLAND COTTON CASE
Bruno, Flávio Marcelo Rodrigues
WTO. Upland Cotton. International Responsibility. International Jurisdiction.
OMC
Upland Cotton
Responsabilidade Internacional
Jurisdição Internacional.
title_short NORTH AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY IN THE TRADE JURISDICTION OF THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION FROM THE WTO-OSC / DS267 - UPLAND COTTON CASE
title_full NORTH AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY IN THE TRADE JURISDICTION OF THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION FROM THE WTO-OSC / DS267 - UPLAND COTTON CASE
title_fullStr NORTH AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY IN THE TRADE JURISDICTION OF THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION FROM THE WTO-OSC / DS267 - UPLAND COTTON CASE
title_full_unstemmed NORTH AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY IN THE TRADE JURISDICTION OF THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION FROM THE WTO-OSC / DS267 - UPLAND COTTON CASE
title_sort NORTH AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY IN THE TRADE JURISDICTION OF THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION FROM THE WTO-OSC / DS267 - UPLAND COTTON CASE
author Bruno, Flávio Marcelo Rodrigues
author_facet Bruno, Flávio Marcelo Rodrigues
de Macedo, Paulo Emílio Vauthier Borges
Ribeiro, Marilda Rosado de Sá
author_role author
author2 de Macedo, Paulo Emílio Vauthier Borges
Ribeiro, Marilda Rosado de Sá
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bruno, Flávio Marcelo Rodrigues
de Macedo, Paulo Emílio Vauthier Borges
Ribeiro, Marilda Rosado de Sá
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv WTO. Upland Cotton. International Responsibility. International Jurisdiction.
OMC
Upland Cotton
Responsabilidade Internacional
Jurisdição Internacional.
topic WTO. Upland Cotton. International Responsibility. International Jurisdiction.
OMC
Upland Cotton
Responsabilidade Internacional
Jurisdição Internacional.
description This paper discusses the international responsibility of the State and therole of international jurisdictions – specifically analyzing the internationalresponsibility of the United States in the commercial jurisdiction of the World TradeOrganization, utilizing the WTO-OSC/DS267, known as the Upland Cotton case. Forthe State, it is inevitable that there will always be conflicts of interest subject tointernationally recognized trade rules. This leads to a situation where internationalorganizations need to implement a harmonization mechanism using decisions basedon the regulation of international trade. Moreover, a State has the obligation to repairdamage caused by disrespecting principles of Public International Law. Furthermore,general principles of international law apply to the WTO and its agreements. In thissense, the relationship of international responsibility in the WTO Dispute SettlementSystem (SSC) transcends party involvement in disputes as it concerns all the WTOmembers.This paper discusses the international responsibility of the State and therole of international jurisdictions – specifically analyzing the internationalresponsibility of the United States in the commercial jurisdiction of the World TradeOrganization, utilizing the WTO-OSC/DS267, known as the Upland Cotton case. Forthe State, it is inevitable that there will always be conflicts of interest subject tointernationally recognized trade rules. This leads to a situation where internationalorganizations need to implement a harmonization mechanism using decisions basedon the regulation of international trade. Moreover, a State has the obligation to repairdamage caused by disrespecting principles of Public International Law. Furthermore,general principles of international law apply to the WTO and its agreements. In thissense, the relationship of international responsibility in the WTO Dispute SettlementSystem (SSC) transcends party involvement in disputes as it concerns all the WTOmembers
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-03-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/33768
10.5433/2178-8189.2019v23n1p25
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/33768
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/2178-8189.2019v23n1p25
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/33768/25171
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris; v. 23 n. 1 (2019); 25-40
2178-8189
1415-6490
reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
collection Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistamdireito@uel.br
_version_ 1799306015522422784