Contractual balance on lease agreement in shopping center: control of unfair terms and the promise of flagship store
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Scientia Iuris (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/24581 |
Resumo: | This paper analyses the contractual balance principle in business-to-business contracts; thus, studying in detail the asymmetry of bargaining power between different parties, which can be foreign to a consumerist relationship. This study also explores the case of a lease agreement that happened between a tenant-shop and a mall owner. Therefore, with the already mentioned example, we aim to discuss the importance and relevance of the different bargaining strength between parties - in particularly, as this specific anchor store had a promise clause, which faithfully falls within the equilibrium of the agreed contract. |
id |
UEL-6_e9d5871d1dc44d06b70099e9dad3012c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/24581 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-6 |
network_name_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Contractual balance on lease agreement in shopping center: control of unfair terms and the promise of flagship storeO equilíbrio contratual nas locações em shopping center: controle de cláusulas abusivas e a promessa de loja âncoraContractual BalanceLease AgreementShopping CenterEquilíbrio ContratualContrato de LocaçãoShopping CenterThis paper analyses the contractual balance principle in business-to-business contracts; thus, studying in detail the asymmetry of bargaining power between different parties, which can be foreign to a consumerist relationship. This study also explores the case of a lease agreement that happened between a tenant-shop and a mall owner. Therefore, with the already mentioned example, we aim to discuss the importance and relevance of the different bargaining strength between parties - in particularly, as this specific anchor store had a promise clause, which faithfully falls within the equilibrium of the agreed contract.O presente artigo objetiva tratar do princípio do equilíbrio contratual nas relações civis e empresariais, quando exista assimetria de poder negocial entre os contratantes fora do âmbito das relações de consumo. Para tanto, apresenta-se o exemplo do contrato de locação firmado entre o lojista e o dono do shopping center para debater a relevância da diferença de força entre as partes e, em especial, como a cláusula de promessa de loja âncora se insere dentro do equilíbrio firmado contratualmente.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2016-11-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/2458110.5433/2178-8189.2016v20n3p176Scientia Iuris; v. 20 n. 3 (2016); 176-2002178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/24581/19979Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKonder, Carlos NelsonPereira Pinto dos Santos, Deborah2016-12-02T13:35:11Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/24581Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2016-12-02T13:35:11Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Contractual balance on lease agreement in shopping center: control of unfair terms and the promise of flagship store O equilíbrio contratual nas locações em shopping center: controle de cláusulas abusivas e a promessa de loja âncora |
title |
Contractual balance on lease agreement in shopping center: control of unfair terms and the promise of flagship store |
spellingShingle |
Contractual balance on lease agreement in shopping center: control of unfair terms and the promise of flagship store Konder, Carlos Nelson Contractual Balance Lease Agreement Shopping Center Equilíbrio Contratual Contrato de Locação Shopping Center |
title_short |
Contractual balance on lease agreement in shopping center: control of unfair terms and the promise of flagship store |
title_full |
Contractual balance on lease agreement in shopping center: control of unfair terms and the promise of flagship store |
title_fullStr |
Contractual balance on lease agreement in shopping center: control of unfair terms and the promise of flagship store |
title_full_unstemmed |
Contractual balance on lease agreement in shopping center: control of unfair terms and the promise of flagship store |
title_sort |
Contractual balance on lease agreement in shopping center: control of unfair terms and the promise of flagship store |
author |
Konder, Carlos Nelson |
author_facet |
Konder, Carlos Nelson Pereira Pinto dos Santos, Deborah |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pereira Pinto dos Santos, Deborah |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Konder, Carlos Nelson Pereira Pinto dos Santos, Deborah |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Contractual Balance Lease Agreement Shopping Center Equilíbrio Contratual Contrato de Locação Shopping Center |
topic |
Contractual Balance Lease Agreement Shopping Center Equilíbrio Contratual Contrato de Locação Shopping Center |
description |
This paper analyses the contractual balance principle in business-to-business contracts; thus, studying in detail the asymmetry of bargaining power between different parties, which can be foreign to a consumerist relationship. This study also explores the case of a lease agreement that happened between a tenant-shop and a mall owner. Therefore, with the already mentioned example, we aim to discuss the importance and relevance of the different bargaining strength between parties - in particularly, as this specific anchor store had a promise clause, which faithfully falls within the equilibrium of the agreed contract. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-11-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/24581 10.5433/2178-8189.2016v20n3p176 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/24581 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/2178-8189.2016v20n3p176 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/24581/19979 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris; v. 20 n. 3 (2016); 176-200 2178-8189 1415-6490 reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
collection |
Scientia Iuris (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistamdireito@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306015106138112 |