The PROPORTIONALITY AS LEGAL LIMIT THE RIGHT NEGOTIATING

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: da Silva Zolet, Lucas Augusto
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Santos de Morais, Fausto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Scientia Iuris (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/19935
Resumo: This paper proposes a maximum of proportionality study and its maximum partial, especially of the Negotiating law perspective and in the sphere of legal limitation for proportionality in the practice of commercial freedoms. The constant use of the maximum of proportionality, as the basis of judicial decisions without proper methodological rigor, triggers a debate about the use of the Theory of Fundamental Rights as a mere rhetorical reference, including criticism of an incomplete legal basis of the principle of proportionality, which by means of judicial decisions can take on a different character or subverted that provided in the doctrine of Robert Alexy.     
id UEL-6_f1cc050894262714e4ddb6f8046189f5
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19935
network_acronym_str UEL-6
network_name_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The PROPORTIONALITY AS LEGAL LIMIT THE RIGHT NEGOTIATINGA proporcionalidade como limite jurídico ao direito negocialProportionality MaximumFundamental RightsJudicial decisionRobert AlexyMáxima da ProporcionalidadeDireitos FundamentaisDecisão JudicialRobert AlexyThis paper proposes a maximum of proportionality study and its maximum partial, especially of the Negotiating law perspective and in the sphere of legal limitation for proportionality in the practice of commercial freedoms. The constant use of the maximum of proportionality, as the basis of judicial decisions without proper methodological rigor, triggers a debate about the use of the Theory of Fundamental Rights as a mere rhetorical reference, including criticism of an incomplete legal basis of the principle of proportionality, which by means of judicial decisions can take on a different character or subverted that provided in the doctrine of Robert Alexy.     Este trabalho propõe o estudo da máxima da proporcionalidade e suas máximas parciais, sobretudo da perspectiva do Direito Negocial e na esfera da limitação jurídica pela proporcionalidade ao exercício de liberdades comerciais. O emprego constante da máxima da proporcionalidade, como fundamento das decisões judiciais, sem o devido rigor metodológico, provoca um debate acerca da utilização da Teoria dos Direitos Fundamentais como mera referência retórica, compreendendo a crítica de uma fundamentação judicial incompleta do princípio da proporcionalidade, o qual por meio das decisões judiciais pode assumir um caráter distinto ou subvertido daquele previsto na doutrina de Robert Alexy.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2015-06-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/1993510.5433/2178-8189.2015v19n1p149Scientia Iuris; v. 19 n. 1 (2015); 149-1662178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/19935/16319Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessda Silva Zolet, Lucas AugustoSantos de Morais, Fausto2015-06-09T13:35:52Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19935Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2015-06-09T13:35:52Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The PROPORTIONALITY AS LEGAL LIMIT THE RIGHT NEGOTIATING
A proporcionalidade como limite jurídico ao direito negocial
title The PROPORTIONALITY AS LEGAL LIMIT THE RIGHT NEGOTIATING
spellingShingle The PROPORTIONALITY AS LEGAL LIMIT THE RIGHT NEGOTIATING
da Silva Zolet, Lucas Augusto
Proportionality Maximum
Fundamental Rights
Judicial decision
Robert Alexy
Máxima da Proporcionalidade
Direitos Fundamentais
Decisão Judicial
Robert Alexy
title_short The PROPORTIONALITY AS LEGAL LIMIT THE RIGHT NEGOTIATING
title_full The PROPORTIONALITY AS LEGAL LIMIT THE RIGHT NEGOTIATING
title_fullStr The PROPORTIONALITY AS LEGAL LIMIT THE RIGHT NEGOTIATING
title_full_unstemmed The PROPORTIONALITY AS LEGAL LIMIT THE RIGHT NEGOTIATING
title_sort The PROPORTIONALITY AS LEGAL LIMIT THE RIGHT NEGOTIATING
author da Silva Zolet, Lucas Augusto
author_facet da Silva Zolet, Lucas Augusto
Santos de Morais, Fausto
author_role author
author2 Santos de Morais, Fausto
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv da Silva Zolet, Lucas Augusto
Santos de Morais, Fausto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Proportionality Maximum
Fundamental Rights
Judicial decision
Robert Alexy
Máxima da Proporcionalidade
Direitos Fundamentais
Decisão Judicial
Robert Alexy
topic Proportionality Maximum
Fundamental Rights
Judicial decision
Robert Alexy
Máxima da Proporcionalidade
Direitos Fundamentais
Decisão Judicial
Robert Alexy
description This paper proposes a maximum of proportionality study and its maximum partial, especially of the Negotiating law perspective and in the sphere of legal limitation for proportionality in the practice of commercial freedoms. The constant use of the maximum of proportionality, as the basis of judicial decisions without proper methodological rigor, triggers a debate about the use of the Theory of Fundamental Rights as a mere rhetorical reference, including criticism of an incomplete legal basis of the principle of proportionality, which by means of judicial decisions can take on a different character or subverted that provided in the doctrine of Robert Alexy.     
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-06-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/19935
10.5433/2178-8189.2015v19n1p149
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/19935
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/2178-8189.2015v19n1p149
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/19935/16319
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris; v. 19 n. 1 (2015); 149-166
2178-8189
1415-6490
reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
collection Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistamdireito@uel.br
_version_ 1799306014734942208

Registros relacionados