Between systematic reviews and bibliometrics: how has the academic production in administration been mapped in Brazil?

• Autor(a) principal: Cassundé, Fernanda Roda de Souza Araújo
• Data de Publicação: 2018
• Outros Autores: Barbosa, Milka Alves Correia, Mendonça, José Ricardo Costa
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Informação & Informação
• Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/25226
• topic: Bibliometry; State of art; Knowledge organization; Bibliometría; Estado de la técnica; Organización del conocimiento; Bibliometria; Estado da arte; Organização do conhecimento

Introduction: Considering the progress and expansion of science and technology in recent decades, many are the authors who have discussed the importance of mapping and discussion of academic production in different areas of knowledge. Objective: The purpose of this study was to conduct a discussion about the methodologies used to map the scientific field in the area of Administration. Methodology: We used the database of the Scientific Electronic Library Periodicals (SPELL). Considering the rule of completeness of Bardin (2011), they were discovered and recovered 83 items, ranging from the period 2005-2015. Results: A specific group of researchers has developed the mapping of production in the area since 2005. Multiple databases (events and journals, national and international) are being used by for mapping production. Management has turned to bibliometric studies, however, systematic reviews and systematic reviews remain quite punctual. Conclusion: To carry out the discussion of the methodologies used to map the scientific field in the area of administration was very relevant, mainly because there is, according to the results obtained, a conceptual confusion between bibliometric studies and systematic reviews.