Styles of thinking and creating in organizational context: Differences according to professional position?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia |
DOI: | 10.5433/2236-6407.2011v2n2p171 |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/eip/article/view/10804 |
Resumo: | This study aimed to identify the style of thinking and creating in professionals a pharmaceutical distribution company, in order to verify the existence of different styles according to gender, educational level and position held. Forty professionals, including 30 women and 10 men, aged 17 years and 35 years (M=24.5, SD=5.4), with high school education (n=14) and college (n=26) were divided into two groups, the first being formed by professionals working in the tax and accounting (n=20), and another group of professionals who hold positions in the sales (n=20). They answered the scale Styles of Thinking and Creating individually during office hours. The results showed that only the logical-objective style proved to be influenced by the area of performance (F=4.745; p<=0.037), with all others variables showed no significant influences. In the present study, gender and educational level did not influence the styles of thinking and creating of the participants as well as all other interactions. It was also found that most of the sample appears as the predominant style logical-objective, regardless of sex (62.0% of women and 72.7% of men were classified in this style), level of education (with 57 1% of professionals with high school and 69.2% with college) and in relation to the field (60.0% of the participants in the accounting/tax filing this predominant style and 70.0% of professionals in sales). |
id |
UEL-9_17e2d41f97becb77c7caab02ecd984f0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10804 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-9 |
network_name_str |
Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia |
spelling |
Styles of thinking and creating in organizational context: Differences according to professional position?Estilos de pensar y de crear en el contexto de la organización: Diferencias de acuerdo a la posición profesional?Estilos de pensar e criar no contexto organizacional: Diferenças de acordo com o cargo profissional?stylecreativitygendereducationorganizationalestiloscriatividadegêneroescolaridadeorganizacionalThis study aimed to identify the style of thinking and creating in professionals a pharmaceutical distribution company, in order to verify the existence of different styles according to gender, educational level and position held. Forty professionals, including 30 women and 10 men, aged 17 years and 35 years (M=24.5, SD=5.4), with high school education (n=14) and college (n=26) were divided into two groups, the first being formed by professionals working in the tax and accounting (n=20), and another group of professionals who hold positions in the sales (n=20). They answered the scale Styles of Thinking and Creating individually during office hours. The results showed that only the logical-objective style proved to be influenced by the area of performance (F=4.745; p<=0.037), with all others variables showed no significant influences. In the present study, gender and educational level did not influence the styles of thinking and creating of the participants as well as all other interactions. It was also found that most of the sample appears as the predominant style logical-objective, regardless of sex (62.0% of women and 72.7% of men were classified in this style), level of education (with 57 1% of professionals with high school and 69.2% with college) and in relation to the field (60.0% of the participants in the accounting/tax filing this predominant style and 70.0% of professionals in sales).Este estudio tuvo como objetivo identificar el estilo de pensamiento y de creación de los profesionales de una empresa de distribución farmacéutica con el fin de verificar la existencia de estilos diferentes en función del sexo, nivel educativo y cargo. Cuarenta profesionales, 30 mujeres y 10 hombres, de 17 años y 35 años (M=24,5, SD=5,4) con la educación que corresponde la escuela secundaria (n=14) y superior (n=26) fueron divididos en dos grupos, siendo el primero formado por los profesionales que trabajan en los impuestos y contabilidad (n=20), y otro grupo de profesionales que ocupan cargos en el área de ventas (n=20). Los participantes respondieron a Escala de Estilos de Pensar y Crear de forma individual durante las horas de trabajo. Los resultados mostraron que sólo el estilo logico-objetivo resultó ser influenciados por el área de desempeño (F=4,745, p<=0,037), y todos los demás no mostraron una influencia. En el presente estudio, sexo y nivel educativo mostró que no influyen en los estilos de pensamiento y la creación de los participantes, así como todas las demás interacciones. También se encontró que la mayoría de la muestra aparece como el estilo predominante lógico-objetivo, independientemente de su sexo (62,0% de las mujeres y 72,7% de los hombres fueran classificadas en este estilo), nivel de educación (con 57 1% de los profesionales de la escuela secundaria y el 69,2% con educación superior) y en relación con el campo (60,0% de los participantes en la presentación de la contabilidad/impuestos de este estilo predominante y el 70,0% de los profesionales en las ventas).O presente estudo visou identificar o estilo de pensar e criar dos profissionais de uma empresa do ramo de distribuição de produtos farmacêuticos, a fim de verificar a existência de diferentes estilos predominantes, de acordo com as variáveis sexo, escolaridade e cargo ocupado. Quarenta profissionais, sendo 30 mulheres e 10 homens, com idades entre 17 anos e 35 anos (M=24,5; DP=5,4) e escolaridade correspondente ao Ensino Médio (n=14) e Superior (n=26) foram divididos em dois grupos, sendo o primeiro formado por profissionais que trabalhavam na área fiscal e contábil (n=20), e outro grupo de profissionais que exerciam cargos na área de vendas (n=20). Os participantes responderam à Escala de Estilos de Pensar e Criar de forma individual durante o horário de trabalho. Os resultados demonstraram que somente o estilo lógico-objetivo mostrou-se influenciado pela área de atuação (F=4,745; p<=0,037), sendo que todas as demais influências não mostraram significativas. No presente estudo, as variáveis sexo e nível de escolaridade não exerceram influência nos estilos de pensar e criar dos participantes, assim como todas as demais interações. Verificou-se ainda que a maior parte da amostra estudada apresenta como estilo predominante o Lógico-objetivo, independente do sexo (62,0% das mulheres foram classificadas nesse estilo e 72,7% dos homens), do nível de escolaridade (com 57,1% dos profissionais com Ensino Médio e 69,2% com Ensino Superior) e em relação à área de atuação (60,0% dos participantes da área contábil/fiscal apresentando esse estilo predominante e 70,0% dos profissionais da área de vendas).Universidade Estadual de Londrina2011-02-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/eip/article/view/1080410.5433/2236-6407.2011v2n2p171Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia; v. 2 n. 2 (2011); 171-1932236-6407reponame:Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologiainstname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/eip/article/view/10804/9551Copyright (c) 2011 Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNakano, Tatiana de CássiaCampos, Carolina RosaSilva, Talita Fernanda daGomes Pereira, Elida Kalina2020-07-17T23:00:37Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10804Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/eipPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/eip/oai||revistaeip@uel.br2236-64072236-6407opendoar:2020-07-17T23:00:37Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Styles of thinking and creating in organizational context: Differences according to professional position? Estilos de pensar y de crear en el contexto de la organización: Diferencias de acuerdo a la posición profesional? Estilos de pensar e criar no contexto organizacional: Diferenças de acordo com o cargo profissional? |
title |
Styles of thinking and creating in organizational context: Differences according to professional position? |
spellingShingle |
Styles of thinking and creating in organizational context: Differences according to professional position? Styles of thinking and creating in organizational context: Differences according to professional position? Nakano, Tatiana de Cássia style creativity gender education organizational estilos criatividade gênero escolaridade organizacional Nakano, Tatiana de Cássia style creativity gender education organizational estilos criatividade gênero escolaridade organizacional |
title_short |
Styles of thinking and creating in organizational context: Differences according to professional position? |
title_full |
Styles of thinking and creating in organizational context: Differences according to professional position? |
title_fullStr |
Styles of thinking and creating in organizational context: Differences according to professional position? Styles of thinking and creating in organizational context: Differences according to professional position? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Styles of thinking and creating in organizational context: Differences according to professional position? Styles of thinking and creating in organizational context: Differences according to professional position? |
title_sort |
Styles of thinking and creating in organizational context: Differences according to professional position? |
author |
Nakano, Tatiana de Cássia |
author_facet |
Nakano, Tatiana de Cássia Nakano, Tatiana de Cássia Campos, Carolina Rosa Silva, Talita Fernanda da Gomes Pereira, Elida Kalina Campos, Carolina Rosa Silva, Talita Fernanda da Gomes Pereira, Elida Kalina |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Campos, Carolina Rosa Silva, Talita Fernanda da Gomes Pereira, Elida Kalina |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Nakano, Tatiana de Cássia Campos, Carolina Rosa Silva, Talita Fernanda da Gomes Pereira, Elida Kalina |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
style creativity gender education organizational estilos criatividade gênero escolaridade organizacional |
topic |
style creativity gender education organizational estilos criatividade gênero escolaridade organizacional |
description |
This study aimed to identify the style of thinking and creating in professionals a pharmaceutical distribution company, in order to verify the existence of different styles according to gender, educational level and position held. Forty professionals, including 30 women and 10 men, aged 17 years and 35 years (M=24.5, SD=5.4), with high school education (n=14) and college (n=26) were divided into two groups, the first being formed by professionals working in the tax and accounting (n=20), and another group of professionals who hold positions in the sales (n=20). They answered the scale Styles of Thinking and Creating individually during office hours. The results showed that only the logical-objective style proved to be influenced by the area of performance (F=4.745; p<=0.037), with all others variables showed no significant influences. In the present study, gender and educational level did not influence the styles of thinking and creating of the participants as well as all other interactions. It was also found that most of the sample appears as the predominant style logical-objective, regardless of sex (62.0% of women and 72.7% of men were classified in this style), level of education (with 57 1% of professionals with high school and 69.2% with college) and in relation to the field (60.0% of the participants in the accounting/tax filing this predominant style and 70.0% of professionals in sales). |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-02-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/eip/article/view/10804 10.5433/2236-6407.2011v2n2p171 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/eip/article/view/10804 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/2236-6407.2011v2n2p171 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/eip/article/view/10804/9551 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2011 Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2011 Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia; v. 2 n. 2 (2011); 171-193 2236-6407 reponame:Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia |
collection |
Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistaeip@uel.br |
_version_ |
1822182698531160064 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.5433/2236-6407.2011v2n2p171 |