AMONG ANTITHESIS AND PARADOXES: THE LITERACY CYCLE IN EDUCATIONAL POLICIES
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Teoria e Prática da Educação (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/TeorPratEduc/article/view/36619 |
Resumo: | - The article discusses literacy senses and their implications for teaching practice that unfold production of contemporary educational policies and far-reaching – the National Pact for Literacy in the Age One (2012) and the Common Core Curriculum (2015). Thus, from the relationship between curriculum and training policies observing the interweaving of these, not as cause and effect, but as complex and ambivalent process takes as a theme of questioning the concept of literacy cycle institutionalized from the expansion of primary education in 9 years and observes how this is thematized in the analyzed policies. Notes the construction of antitheses and paradoxes that mean the literacy teachers practices seeking to discuss about the significance that this question gains in policy, which takes place from research on curriculum policies and seated literacy in a discursive perspective comprising the production of policies and political productions-discursive. It is argued that the displacement/sliding significant as literacy, cycle, assessment, knowledge in the analysis of own understanding of literacy cycle observed in the different documents is organized in the production of a pedagogical discourse that means investing in a given perspective of teaching literacy practice, joint that creates demands for daily production curriculum in the early years of elementary school. |
id |
UEM-11_52681aa78b01b8514cfc751aaf75a583 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/36619 |
network_acronym_str |
UEM-11 |
network_name_str |
Teoria e Prática da Educação (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
AMONG ANTITHESIS AND PARADOXES: THE LITERACY CYCLE IN EDUCATIONAL POLICIESENTRE ANTÍTESES E PARADOXOS: O CICLO DE ALFABETIZAÇÃO NAS POLÍTICAS EDUCACIONAISLiteracy cycleEducational policiesCurriculumTeacher training.Ciclo de AlfabetizaçãoPolíticas educacionaisCurrículoFormação de professors.- The article discusses literacy senses and their implications for teaching practice that unfold production of contemporary educational policies and far-reaching – the National Pact for Literacy in the Age One (2012) and the Common Core Curriculum (2015). Thus, from the relationship between curriculum and training policies observing the interweaving of these, not as cause and effect, but as complex and ambivalent process takes as a theme of questioning the concept of literacy cycle institutionalized from the expansion of primary education in 9 years and observes how this is thematized in the analyzed policies. Notes the construction of antitheses and paradoxes that mean the literacy teachers practices seeking to discuss about the significance that this question gains in policy, which takes place from research on curriculum policies and seated literacy in a discursive perspective comprising the production of policies and political productions-discursive. It is argued that the displacement/sliding significant as literacy, cycle, assessment, knowledge in the analysis of own understanding of literacy cycle observed in the different documents is organized in the production of a pedagogical discourse that means investing in a given perspective of teaching literacy practice, joint that creates demands for daily production curriculum in the early years of elementary school. O artigo busca discutir os sentidos de alfabetização e suas implicações para a prática pedagógica, que se desdobram da produção de políticas educacionais contemporâneas e de grande alcance – o Pacto Nacional pela Alfabetização na Idade Certa (2012) e a Base Nacional Comum Curricular (2015). Assim, a partir da articulação entre políticas curriculares e de formação, observando o imbricamento delas não como causa e efeito, mas como processo complexo e ambivalente, toma como mote de problematização o conceito de Ciclo de Alfabetização institucionalizado a partir da ampliação do Ensino Fundamental de 9 anos e observa como ele é tematizado nas políticas analisadas. Observa a construção de antíteses e paradoxos que significam as práticas alfabetizadoras buscando discutir a significação que tal questão ganha nas políticas, o que se dá a partir de pesquisa sobre políticas curriculares e alfabetização assentada numa perspectiva discursiva que compreende a produção de políticas como produções político-discursivas. Argumenta-se que o deslocamento/deslizamento de significantes como alfabetização, ciclo, avaliação, conhecimento na análise do próprio entendimento de Ciclo de Alfabetização observado nos diferentes documentos se articula na produção de um discurso pedagógico que significa o investimento numa dada perspectiva de prática pedagógica alfabetizadora, uma articulação que cria demandas para a produção curricular cotidiana nos anos iniciais do Ensino Fundamental. Universidade Estadual de Maringá2017-05-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/TeorPratEduc/article/view/3661910.4025/tpe.v19i3.36619Teoria e Prática da Educação; v. 19 n. 3 (2016); 33-452237-87071415-837Xreponame:Teoria e Prática da Educação (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMporhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/TeorPratEduc/article/view/36619/pdfFrangella, Rita de Cássia Prazeresinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-11-30T10:34:22Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/36619Revistahttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/TeorPratEducPUBhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/TeorPratEduc/oaiteoriaepraticadaeducacao@gmail.com || teoriaepraticadaeducacao@gmail.com2237-87071415-837xopendoar:2023-01-12T10:59:33.718667Teoria e Prática da Educação (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
AMONG ANTITHESIS AND PARADOXES: THE LITERACY CYCLE IN EDUCATIONAL POLICIES ENTRE ANTÍTESES E PARADOXOS: O CICLO DE ALFABETIZAÇÃO NAS POLÍTICAS EDUCACIONAIS |
title |
AMONG ANTITHESIS AND PARADOXES: THE LITERACY CYCLE IN EDUCATIONAL POLICIES |
spellingShingle |
AMONG ANTITHESIS AND PARADOXES: THE LITERACY CYCLE IN EDUCATIONAL POLICIES Frangella, Rita de Cássia Prazeres Literacy cycle Educational policies Curriculum Teacher training. Ciclo de Alfabetização Políticas educacionais Currículo Formação de professors. |
title_short |
AMONG ANTITHESIS AND PARADOXES: THE LITERACY CYCLE IN EDUCATIONAL POLICIES |
title_full |
AMONG ANTITHESIS AND PARADOXES: THE LITERACY CYCLE IN EDUCATIONAL POLICIES |
title_fullStr |
AMONG ANTITHESIS AND PARADOXES: THE LITERACY CYCLE IN EDUCATIONAL POLICIES |
title_full_unstemmed |
AMONG ANTITHESIS AND PARADOXES: THE LITERACY CYCLE IN EDUCATIONAL POLICIES |
title_sort |
AMONG ANTITHESIS AND PARADOXES: THE LITERACY CYCLE IN EDUCATIONAL POLICIES |
author |
Frangella, Rita de Cássia Prazeres |
author_facet |
Frangella, Rita de Cássia Prazeres |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Frangella, Rita de Cássia Prazeres |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Literacy cycle Educational policies Curriculum Teacher training. Ciclo de Alfabetização Políticas educacionais Currículo Formação de professors. |
topic |
Literacy cycle Educational policies Curriculum Teacher training. Ciclo de Alfabetização Políticas educacionais Currículo Formação de professors. |
description |
- The article discusses literacy senses and their implications for teaching practice that unfold production of contemporary educational policies and far-reaching – the National Pact for Literacy in the Age One (2012) and the Common Core Curriculum (2015). Thus, from the relationship between curriculum and training policies observing the interweaving of these, not as cause and effect, but as complex and ambivalent process takes as a theme of questioning the concept of literacy cycle institutionalized from the expansion of primary education in 9 years and observes how this is thematized in the analyzed policies. Notes the construction of antitheses and paradoxes that mean the literacy teachers practices seeking to discuss about the significance that this question gains in policy, which takes place from research on curriculum policies and seated literacy in a discursive perspective comprising the production of policies and political productions-discursive. It is argued that the displacement/sliding significant as literacy, cycle, assessment, knowledge in the analysis of own understanding of literacy cycle observed in the different documents is organized in the production of a pedagogical discourse that means investing in a given perspective of teaching literacy practice, joint that creates demands for daily production curriculum in the early years of elementary school. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-05-03 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/TeorPratEduc/article/view/36619 10.4025/tpe.v19i3.36619 |
url |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/TeorPratEduc/article/view/36619 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4025/tpe.v19i3.36619 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/TeorPratEduc/article/view/36619/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Teoria e Prática da Educação; v. 19 n. 3 (2016); 33-45 2237-8707 1415-837X reponame:Teoria e Prática da Educação (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) instacron:UEM |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
instacron_str |
UEM |
institution |
UEM |
reponame_str |
Teoria e Prática da Educação (Online) |
collection |
Teoria e Prática da Educação (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Teoria e Prática da Educação (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
teoriaepraticadaeducacao@gmail.com || teoriaepraticadaeducacao@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1792207157329920000 |