AMONG ANTITHESIS AND PARADOXES: THE LITERACY CYCLE IN EDUCATIONAL POLICIES

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Frangella, Rita de Cássia Prazeres
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Teoria e Prática da Educação (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/TeorPratEduc/article/view/36619
Resumo: - The article discusses literacy senses and their implications for teaching practice that unfold production of contemporary educational policies and far-reaching – the National Pact for Literacy in the Age One (2012) and the Common Core Curriculum (2015). Thus, from the relationship between curriculum and training policies observing the interweaving of these, not as cause and effect, but as complex and ambivalent process takes as a theme of questioning the concept of literacy cycle institutionalized from the expansion of primary education in 9 years and observes how this is thematized in the analyzed policies. Notes the construction of antitheses and paradoxes that mean the literacy teachers practices seeking to discuss about the significance that this question gains in policy, which takes place from research on curriculum policies and seated literacy in a discursive perspective comprising the production of policies and political productions-discursive. It is argued that the displacement/sliding significant as literacy, cycle, assessment, knowledge in the analysis of own understanding of literacy cycle observed in the different documents is organized in the production of a pedagogical discourse that means investing in a given perspective of teaching literacy practice, joint that creates demands for daily production curriculum in the early years of elementary school. 
id UEM-11_52681aa78b01b8514cfc751aaf75a583
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/36619
network_acronym_str UEM-11
network_name_str Teoria e Prática da Educação (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling AMONG ANTITHESIS AND PARADOXES: THE LITERACY CYCLE IN EDUCATIONAL POLICIESENTRE ANTÍTESES E PARADOXOS: O CICLO DE ALFABETIZAÇÃO NAS POLÍTICAS EDUCACIONAISLiteracy cycleEducational policiesCurriculumTeacher training.Ciclo de AlfabetizaçãoPolíticas educacionaisCurrículoFormação de professors.- The article discusses literacy senses and their implications for teaching practice that unfold production of contemporary educational policies and far-reaching – the National Pact for Literacy in the Age One (2012) and the Common Core Curriculum (2015). Thus, from the relationship between curriculum and training policies observing the interweaving of these, not as cause and effect, but as complex and ambivalent process takes as a theme of questioning the concept of literacy cycle institutionalized from the expansion of primary education in 9 years and observes how this is thematized in the analyzed policies. Notes the construction of antitheses and paradoxes that mean the literacy teachers practices seeking to discuss about the significance that this question gains in policy, which takes place from research on curriculum policies and seated literacy in a discursive perspective comprising the production of policies and political productions-discursive. It is argued that the displacement/sliding significant as literacy, cycle, assessment, knowledge in the analysis of own understanding of literacy cycle observed in the different documents is organized in the production of a pedagogical discourse that means investing in a given perspective of teaching literacy practice, joint that creates demands for daily production curriculum in the early years of elementary school. O artigo busca discutir os sentidos de alfabetização e suas implicações para a prática pedagógica, que se desdobram da produção de políticas educacionais contemporâneas e de grande alcance – o Pacto Nacional pela Alfabetização na Idade Certa (2012) e a Base Nacional Comum Curricular (2015). Assim, a partir da articulação entre políticas curriculares e de formação, observando o imbricamento delas não como causa e efeito, mas como processo complexo e ambivalente, toma como mote de problematização o conceito de Ciclo de Alfabetização institucionalizado a partir da ampliação do Ensino Fundamental de 9 anos e observa como ele é tematizado nas políticas analisadas. Observa a construção de antíteses e paradoxos que significam as práticas alfabetizadoras buscando discutir a significação que tal questão ganha nas políticas, o que se dá a partir de pesquisa sobre políticas curriculares e alfabetização assentada numa perspectiva discursiva que compreende a produção de políticas como produções político-discursivas. Argumenta-se que o deslocamento/deslizamento de significantes como alfabetização, ciclo, avaliação, conhecimento na análise do próprio entendimento de Ciclo de Alfabetização observado nos diferentes documentos se articula na produção de um discurso pedagógico que significa o investimento numa dada perspectiva de prática pedagógica alfabetizadora, uma articulação que cria demandas para a produção curricular cotidiana nos anos iniciais do Ensino Fundamental. Universidade Estadual de Maringá2017-05-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/TeorPratEduc/article/view/3661910.4025/tpe.v19i3.36619Teoria e Prática da Educação; v. 19 n. 3 (2016); 33-452237-87071415-837Xreponame:Teoria e Prática da Educação (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMporhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/TeorPratEduc/article/view/36619/pdfFrangella, Rita de Cássia Prazeresinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-11-30T10:34:22Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/36619Revistahttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/TeorPratEducPUBhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/TeorPratEduc/oaiteoriaepraticadaeducacao@gmail.com || teoriaepraticadaeducacao@gmail.com2237-87071415-837xopendoar:2023-01-12T10:59:33.718667Teoria e Prática da Educação (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv AMONG ANTITHESIS AND PARADOXES: THE LITERACY CYCLE IN EDUCATIONAL POLICIES
ENTRE ANTÍTESES E PARADOXOS: O CICLO DE ALFABETIZAÇÃO NAS POLÍTICAS EDUCACIONAIS
title AMONG ANTITHESIS AND PARADOXES: THE LITERACY CYCLE IN EDUCATIONAL POLICIES
spellingShingle AMONG ANTITHESIS AND PARADOXES: THE LITERACY CYCLE IN EDUCATIONAL POLICIES
Frangella, Rita de Cássia Prazeres
Literacy cycle
Educational policies
Curriculum
Teacher training.
Ciclo de Alfabetização
Políticas educacionais
Currículo
Formação de professors.
title_short AMONG ANTITHESIS AND PARADOXES: THE LITERACY CYCLE IN EDUCATIONAL POLICIES
title_full AMONG ANTITHESIS AND PARADOXES: THE LITERACY CYCLE IN EDUCATIONAL POLICIES
title_fullStr AMONG ANTITHESIS AND PARADOXES: THE LITERACY CYCLE IN EDUCATIONAL POLICIES
title_full_unstemmed AMONG ANTITHESIS AND PARADOXES: THE LITERACY CYCLE IN EDUCATIONAL POLICIES
title_sort AMONG ANTITHESIS AND PARADOXES: THE LITERACY CYCLE IN EDUCATIONAL POLICIES
author Frangella, Rita de Cássia Prazeres
author_facet Frangella, Rita de Cássia Prazeres
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Frangella, Rita de Cássia Prazeres
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Literacy cycle
Educational policies
Curriculum
Teacher training.
Ciclo de Alfabetização
Políticas educacionais
Currículo
Formação de professors.
topic Literacy cycle
Educational policies
Curriculum
Teacher training.
Ciclo de Alfabetização
Políticas educacionais
Currículo
Formação de professors.
description - The article discusses literacy senses and their implications for teaching practice that unfold production of contemporary educational policies and far-reaching – the National Pact for Literacy in the Age One (2012) and the Common Core Curriculum (2015). Thus, from the relationship between curriculum and training policies observing the interweaving of these, not as cause and effect, but as complex and ambivalent process takes as a theme of questioning the concept of literacy cycle institutionalized from the expansion of primary education in 9 years and observes how this is thematized in the analyzed policies. Notes the construction of antitheses and paradoxes that mean the literacy teachers practices seeking to discuss about the significance that this question gains in policy, which takes place from research on curriculum policies and seated literacy in a discursive perspective comprising the production of policies and political productions-discursive. It is argued that the displacement/sliding significant as literacy, cycle, assessment, knowledge in the analysis of own understanding of literacy cycle observed in the different documents is organized in the production of a pedagogical discourse that means investing in a given perspective of teaching literacy practice, joint that creates demands for daily production curriculum in the early years of elementary school. 
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-05-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/TeorPratEduc/article/view/36619
10.4025/tpe.v19i3.36619
url https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/TeorPratEduc/article/view/36619
identifier_str_mv 10.4025/tpe.v19i3.36619
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/TeorPratEduc/article/view/36619/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Maringá
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Maringá
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Teoria e Prática da Educação; v. 19 n. 3 (2016); 33-45
2237-8707
1415-837X
reponame:Teoria e Prática da Educação (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron:UEM
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron_str UEM
institution UEM
reponame_str Teoria e Prática da Educação (Online)
collection Teoria e Prática da Educação (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Teoria e Prática da Educação (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv teoriaepraticadaeducacao@gmail.com || teoriaepraticadaeducacao@gmail.com
_version_ 1792207157329920000