Student, text and teacher: the conflicting relationships in writing evaluation of higher education entrance examinations
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2008 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/4188 |
Resumo: | Three situations are overlapped in writing evaluation: the thematic proposal arising from the supporting text, the student’s reading and the teacher’s expectancy from the topic proposed. Thus, if the evaluating teacher does not take this trifold situation and its relevance into account, the teacher may be misled in his evaluation for not considering the student’s thematic topic reading, resulting in discrepant grading when the composition is evaluated by two teachers. This article discusses the procedures that may contribute to minimize these conflicts so commom in the school context. |
id |
UEM-3_42e914101f178fb91ad176a41bf9800c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/4188 |
network_acronym_str |
UEM-3 |
network_name_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Student, text and teacher: the conflicting relationships in writing evaluation of higher education entrance examinationsO aluno, o texto e o professor: as relações conflitantes na avaliação de redação de concursos vestibularesavaliaçãoensinoleituralíngua maternaredaçãoThree situations are overlapped in writing evaluation: the thematic proposal arising from the supporting text, the student’s reading and the teacher’s expectancy from the topic proposed. Thus, if the evaluating teacher does not take this trifold situation and its relevance into account, the teacher may be misled in his evaluation for not considering the student’s thematic topic reading, resulting in discrepant grading when the composition is evaluated by two teachers. This article discusses the procedures that may contribute to minimize these conflicts so commom in the school context.Na avaliação de uma redação, imbricam-se três situações: a proposta temática que emana do texto de apoio, a leitura que o aluno faz e a leitura que o avaliador espera, a partir dessa proposta temática. Assim, se o professor-avaliador não levar em consideração esse tripé e a sua relevância na avaliação, poderá fazê-la de forma equivocada, desconsiderando a leitura do aluno. O resultado, dessa forma, é a atribuição de notas discrepantes, se a redação for submetida à avaliação de dois professores-avaliadores. Discutir procedimentos que possam contribuir para minimizar esses conflitos, comuns no contexto escolar, é a proposta deste artigo.Universidade Estadual De Maringá2008-07-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/418810.4025/actascihumansoc.v21i0.4188Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; Vol 21 (1999); 71-77Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; v. 21 (1999); 71-771807-86561679-7361reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMporhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/4188/2853Zanini, MarilurdesMenegassi, Renilson Joséinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-11-23T17:35:30Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/4188Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/indexPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/oai||actahuman@uem.br1807-86561679-7361opendoar:2022-11-23T17:35:30Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Student, text and teacher: the conflicting relationships in writing evaluation of higher education entrance examinations O aluno, o texto e o professor: as relações conflitantes na avaliação de redação de concursos vestibulares |
title |
Student, text and teacher: the conflicting relationships in writing evaluation of higher education entrance examinations |
spellingShingle |
Student, text and teacher: the conflicting relationships in writing evaluation of higher education entrance examinations Zanini, Marilurdes avaliação ensino leitura língua materna redação |
title_short |
Student, text and teacher: the conflicting relationships in writing evaluation of higher education entrance examinations |
title_full |
Student, text and teacher: the conflicting relationships in writing evaluation of higher education entrance examinations |
title_fullStr |
Student, text and teacher: the conflicting relationships in writing evaluation of higher education entrance examinations |
title_full_unstemmed |
Student, text and teacher: the conflicting relationships in writing evaluation of higher education entrance examinations |
title_sort |
Student, text and teacher: the conflicting relationships in writing evaluation of higher education entrance examinations |
author |
Zanini, Marilurdes |
author_facet |
Zanini, Marilurdes Menegassi, Renilson José |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Menegassi, Renilson José |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Zanini, Marilurdes Menegassi, Renilson José |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
avaliação ensino leitura língua materna redação |
topic |
avaliação ensino leitura língua materna redação |
description |
Three situations are overlapped in writing evaluation: the thematic proposal arising from the supporting text, the student’s reading and the teacher’s expectancy from the topic proposed. Thus, if the evaluating teacher does not take this trifold situation and its relevance into account, the teacher may be misled in his evaluation for not considering the student’s thematic topic reading, resulting in discrepant grading when the composition is evaluated by two teachers. This article discusses the procedures that may contribute to minimize these conflicts so commom in the school context. |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-07-02 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/4188 10.4025/actascihumansoc.v21i0.4188 |
url |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/4188 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4025/actascihumansoc.v21i0.4188 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/4188/2853 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual De Maringá |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual De Maringá |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; Vol 21 (1999); 71-77 Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; v. 21 (1999); 71-77 1807-8656 1679-7361 reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) instacron:UEM |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
instacron_str |
UEM |
institution |
UEM |
reponame_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) |
collection |
Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||actahuman@uem.br |
_version_ |
1799317507735027712 |