The internationalization of the forestry codes of Brazil and France

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Serpa, João Eduardo Colognesi
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Santos, Antônio Carlos dos, Santos, Lorena Xavier Conceição
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online)
Texto Completo: http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/43773
Resumo: Sovereignty is a founding principle of international relations. It shapes the way states address the various topics of the international political agenda. The approach to some issues, though, must be reconsidered, lest sovereignty may impose limits down on their management. The forests are one such topic. It is impossible to restrict the ecological benefits that they generate to the borders of a nation, to the same extent that the damages caused by forest devastation will affect the whole world. The Amazon, which has a major role in bringing balance to planet Earth, should not be claimed as the property of only few countries. Indeed, since the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, in Stockholm, 1972, international society has been trying to make environmental governance more uniform and cohesive. State institutions and legislations have been influenced by this trend, what can be observed in the Forestry Codes of Brazil and France, two Amazon states themselves. This paper’s goal is to compare the degree of internationalization attained by environmental legislations in the Amazon territories of Brazil and France - in French Guiana. For this, the comparative-historical analysis and document analysis are adopted, the research being descriptive and explanatory. In the end, it is possible to draw the conclusion that both countries, to varying degrees, have been shaping into the international environmental regime and that French law is the one that is closer to treating the Amazon as a global good.
id UEM-3_aae4353264505775feec6fa2d9f90c71
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/43773
network_acronym_str UEM-3
network_name_str Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The internationalization of the forestry codes of Brazil and FranceA internacionalização dos códigos florestais de Brasil e Françasovereignty; international regime; AmazonSoberaniaregime internacionalAmazônia.Sovereignty is a founding principle of international relations. It shapes the way states address the various topics of the international political agenda. The approach to some issues, though, must be reconsidered, lest sovereignty may impose limits down on their management. The forests are one such topic. It is impossible to restrict the ecological benefits that they generate to the borders of a nation, to the same extent that the damages caused by forest devastation will affect the whole world. The Amazon, which has a major role in bringing balance to planet Earth, should not be claimed as the property of only few countries. Indeed, since the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, in Stockholm, 1972, international society has been trying to make environmental governance more uniform and cohesive. State institutions and legislations have been influenced by this trend, what can be observed in the Forestry Codes of Brazil and France, two Amazon states themselves. This paper’s goal is to compare the degree of internationalization attained by environmental legislations in the Amazon territories of Brazil and France - in French Guiana. For this, the comparative-historical analysis and document analysis are adopted, the research being descriptive and explanatory. In the end, it is possible to draw the conclusion that both countries, to varying degrees, have been shaping into the international environmental regime and that French law is the one that is closer to treating the Amazon as a global good.A soberania é um princípio fundamental das relações internacionais. Ela molda a maneira como os Estados se portam diante dos mais diversos tópicos da agenda política global. O tratamento de alguns temas, porém, precisa ser reavaliado, por risco de a soberania acabar impondo-lhe limites. As florestas são um desses temas. É impossível restringir os benefícios ecológico-sistêmicos que elas engendram às fronteiras administrativas de uma nação, na mesma medida em que os efeitos nocivos advindos de áreas florestais devastadas se espalham por todo o mundo. Um bioma como o Amazônico, de extrema importância para o equilíbrio do planeta, não pode ser considerado propriedade de poucos países. De fato, desde particularmente a Conferência das Nações Unidas sobre o Meio Ambiente Humano, em Estocolmo, 1972. A sociedade internacional está trabalhando para tornar a governança do meio ambiente progressivamente mais coesa e uniforme. Instituições e legislações estatais têm sofrido influências do movimento, o que pode ser observado nos Códigos Florestais de Brasil e França, dois Estados com território Amazônico. Desse modo, o objetivo deste artigo é comparar o grau de internacionalização existente nas legislações ambientais do território Amazônico do Brasil e da França - na Guiana francesa. Para isso, faz-se uso do método histórico-comparativo e da análise documental, a pesquisa tendo viés descritivo e explicativo. Ao final, conclui-se que ambas as legislações, em diferentes graus, vêm tentando moldar-se ao regime internacional do meio ambiente e que a lei francesa se aproxima mais ao tratamento da Amazônia como patrimônio internacionalUniversidade Estadual De Maringá2019-09-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/4377310.4025/actascihumansoc.v41i2.43773Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; Vol 41 No 2 (2019); e43773Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; v. 41 n. 2 (2019); e437731807-86561679-7361reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMporhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/43773/751375148437Copyright (c) 2019 Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Scienceshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSerpa, João Eduardo Colognesi Santos, Antônio Carlos dosSantos, Lorena Xavier Conceição2019-10-17T16:50:39Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/43773Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/indexPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/oai||actahuman@uem.br1807-86561679-7361opendoar:2019-10-17T16:50:39Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The internationalization of the forestry codes of Brazil and France
A internacionalização dos códigos florestais de Brasil e França
title The internationalization of the forestry codes of Brazil and France
spellingShingle The internationalization of the forestry codes of Brazil and France
Serpa, João Eduardo Colognesi
sovereignty; international regime; Amazon
Soberania
regime internacional
Amazônia.
title_short The internationalization of the forestry codes of Brazil and France
title_full The internationalization of the forestry codes of Brazil and France
title_fullStr The internationalization of the forestry codes of Brazil and France
title_full_unstemmed The internationalization of the forestry codes of Brazil and France
title_sort The internationalization of the forestry codes of Brazil and France
author Serpa, João Eduardo Colognesi
author_facet Serpa, João Eduardo Colognesi
Santos, Antônio Carlos dos
Santos, Lorena Xavier Conceição
author_role author
author2 Santos, Antônio Carlos dos
Santos, Lorena Xavier Conceição
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Serpa, João Eduardo Colognesi
Santos, Antônio Carlos dos
Santos, Lorena Xavier Conceição
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv sovereignty; international regime; Amazon
Soberania
regime internacional
Amazônia.
topic sovereignty; international regime; Amazon
Soberania
regime internacional
Amazônia.
description Sovereignty is a founding principle of international relations. It shapes the way states address the various topics of the international political agenda. The approach to some issues, though, must be reconsidered, lest sovereignty may impose limits down on their management. The forests are one such topic. It is impossible to restrict the ecological benefits that they generate to the borders of a nation, to the same extent that the damages caused by forest devastation will affect the whole world. The Amazon, which has a major role in bringing balance to planet Earth, should not be claimed as the property of only few countries. Indeed, since the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, in Stockholm, 1972, international society has been trying to make environmental governance more uniform and cohesive. State institutions and legislations have been influenced by this trend, what can be observed in the Forestry Codes of Brazil and France, two Amazon states themselves. This paper’s goal is to compare the degree of internationalization attained by environmental legislations in the Amazon territories of Brazil and France - in French Guiana. For this, the comparative-historical analysis and document analysis are adopted, the research being descriptive and explanatory. In the end, it is possible to draw the conclusion that both countries, to varying degrees, have been shaping into the international environmental regime and that French law is the one that is closer to treating the Amazon as a global good.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-09-23
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/43773
10.4025/actascihumansoc.v41i2.43773
url http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/43773
identifier_str_mv 10.4025/actascihumansoc.v41i2.43773
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/43773/751375148437
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual De Maringá
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual De Maringá
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; Vol 41 No 2 (2019); e43773
Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; v. 41 n. 2 (2019); e43773
1807-8656
1679-7361
reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron:UEM
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron_str UEM
institution UEM
reponame_str Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online)
collection Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||actahuman@uem.br
_version_ 1799317509477761024