The internationalization of the forestry codes of Brazil and France
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/43773 |
Resumo: | Sovereignty is a founding principle of international relations. It shapes the way states address the various topics of the international political agenda. The approach to some issues, though, must be reconsidered, lest sovereignty may impose limits down on their management. The forests are one such topic. It is impossible to restrict the ecological benefits that they generate to the borders of a nation, to the same extent that the damages caused by forest devastation will affect the whole world. The Amazon, which has a major role in bringing balance to planet Earth, should not be claimed as the property of only few countries. Indeed, since the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, in Stockholm, 1972, international society has been trying to make environmental governance more uniform and cohesive. State institutions and legislations have been influenced by this trend, what can be observed in the Forestry Codes of Brazil and France, two Amazon states themselves. This paper’s goal is to compare the degree of internationalization attained by environmental legislations in the Amazon territories of Brazil and France - in French Guiana. For this, the comparative-historical analysis and document analysis are adopted, the research being descriptive and explanatory. In the end, it is possible to draw the conclusion that both countries, to varying degrees, have been shaping into the international environmental regime and that French law is the one that is closer to treating the Amazon as a global good. |
id |
UEM-3_aae4353264505775feec6fa2d9f90c71 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/43773 |
network_acronym_str |
UEM-3 |
network_name_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The internationalization of the forestry codes of Brazil and FranceA internacionalização dos códigos florestais de Brasil e Françasovereignty; international regime; AmazonSoberaniaregime internacionalAmazônia.Sovereignty is a founding principle of international relations. It shapes the way states address the various topics of the international political agenda. The approach to some issues, though, must be reconsidered, lest sovereignty may impose limits down on their management. The forests are one such topic. It is impossible to restrict the ecological benefits that they generate to the borders of a nation, to the same extent that the damages caused by forest devastation will affect the whole world. The Amazon, which has a major role in bringing balance to planet Earth, should not be claimed as the property of only few countries. Indeed, since the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, in Stockholm, 1972, international society has been trying to make environmental governance more uniform and cohesive. State institutions and legislations have been influenced by this trend, what can be observed in the Forestry Codes of Brazil and France, two Amazon states themselves. This paper’s goal is to compare the degree of internationalization attained by environmental legislations in the Amazon territories of Brazil and France - in French Guiana. For this, the comparative-historical analysis and document analysis are adopted, the research being descriptive and explanatory. In the end, it is possible to draw the conclusion that both countries, to varying degrees, have been shaping into the international environmental regime and that French law is the one that is closer to treating the Amazon as a global good.A soberania é um princípio fundamental das relações internacionais. Ela molda a maneira como os Estados se portam diante dos mais diversos tópicos da agenda política global. O tratamento de alguns temas, porém, precisa ser reavaliado, por risco de a soberania acabar impondo-lhe limites. As florestas são um desses temas. É impossível restringir os benefícios ecológico-sistêmicos que elas engendram às fronteiras administrativas de uma nação, na mesma medida em que os efeitos nocivos advindos de áreas florestais devastadas se espalham por todo o mundo. Um bioma como o Amazônico, de extrema importância para o equilíbrio do planeta, não pode ser considerado propriedade de poucos países. De fato, desde particularmente a Conferência das Nações Unidas sobre o Meio Ambiente Humano, em Estocolmo, 1972. A sociedade internacional está trabalhando para tornar a governança do meio ambiente progressivamente mais coesa e uniforme. Instituições e legislações estatais têm sofrido influências do movimento, o que pode ser observado nos Códigos Florestais de Brasil e França, dois Estados com território Amazônico. Desse modo, o objetivo deste artigo é comparar o grau de internacionalização existente nas legislações ambientais do território Amazônico do Brasil e da França - na Guiana francesa. Para isso, faz-se uso do método histórico-comparativo e da análise documental, a pesquisa tendo viés descritivo e explicativo. Ao final, conclui-se que ambas as legislações, em diferentes graus, vêm tentando moldar-se ao regime internacional do meio ambiente e que a lei francesa se aproxima mais ao tratamento da Amazônia como patrimônio internacionalUniversidade Estadual De Maringá2019-09-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/4377310.4025/actascihumansoc.v41i2.43773Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; Vol 41 No 2 (2019); e43773Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; v. 41 n. 2 (2019); e437731807-86561679-7361reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMporhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/43773/751375148437Copyright (c) 2019 Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Scienceshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSerpa, João Eduardo Colognesi Santos, Antônio Carlos dosSantos, Lorena Xavier Conceição2019-10-17T16:50:39Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/43773Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/indexPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/oai||actahuman@uem.br1807-86561679-7361opendoar:2019-10-17T16:50:39Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The internationalization of the forestry codes of Brazil and France A internacionalização dos códigos florestais de Brasil e França |
title |
The internationalization of the forestry codes of Brazil and France |
spellingShingle |
The internationalization of the forestry codes of Brazil and France Serpa, João Eduardo Colognesi sovereignty; international regime; Amazon Soberania regime internacional Amazônia. |
title_short |
The internationalization of the forestry codes of Brazil and France |
title_full |
The internationalization of the forestry codes of Brazil and France |
title_fullStr |
The internationalization of the forestry codes of Brazil and France |
title_full_unstemmed |
The internationalization of the forestry codes of Brazil and France |
title_sort |
The internationalization of the forestry codes of Brazil and France |
author |
Serpa, João Eduardo Colognesi |
author_facet |
Serpa, João Eduardo Colognesi Santos, Antônio Carlos dos Santos, Lorena Xavier Conceição |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Santos, Antônio Carlos dos Santos, Lorena Xavier Conceição |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Serpa, João Eduardo Colognesi Santos, Antônio Carlos dos Santos, Lorena Xavier Conceição |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
sovereignty; international regime; Amazon Soberania regime internacional Amazônia. |
topic |
sovereignty; international regime; Amazon Soberania regime internacional Amazônia. |
description |
Sovereignty is a founding principle of international relations. It shapes the way states address the various topics of the international political agenda. The approach to some issues, though, must be reconsidered, lest sovereignty may impose limits down on their management. The forests are one such topic. It is impossible to restrict the ecological benefits that they generate to the borders of a nation, to the same extent that the damages caused by forest devastation will affect the whole world. The Amazon, which has a major role in bringing balance to planet Earth, should not be claimed as the property of only few countries. Indeed, since the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, in Stockholm, 1972, international society has been trying to make environmental governance more uniform and cohesive. State institutions and legislations have been influenced by this trend, what can be observed in the Forestry Codes of Brazil and France, two Amazon states themselves. This paper’s goal is to compare the degree of internationalization attained by environmental legislations in the Amazon territories of Brazil and France - in French Guiana. For this, the comparative-historical analysis and document analysis are adopted, the research being descriptive and explanatory. In the end, it is possible to draw the conclusion that both countries, to varying degrees, have been shaping into the international environmental regime and that French law is the one that is closer to treating the Amazon as a global good. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-09-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/43773 10.4025/actascihumansoc.v41i2.43773 |
url |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/43773 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4025/actascihumansoc.v41i2.43773 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/43773/751375148437 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual De Maringá |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual De Maringá |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; Vol 41 No 2 (2019); e43773 Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; v. 41 n. 2 (2019); e43773 1807-8656 1679-7361 reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) instacron:UEM |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
instacron_str |
UEM |
institution |
UEM |
reponame_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) |
collection |
Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||actahuman@uem.br |
_version_ |
1799317509477761024 |