The prefix “no”: polysemy and productivity in word formation process - DOI: 10.4025/actascihumansoc.v25i1.2196
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2008 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/2196 |
Resumo: | Derivation and composition are among the most productive processes of our lexicon enrichment. Derivation, on its turn, is divided into prefixal and suffixal. The first one is placed before the base, while the second one is placed after it, modifying the meaning of the derivative word. These processes are the means by which new words are frequently formed and either incorporated to our lexicon or not. This paper aims at discussing how the prefix “no” has been treated within the word formation process, the prefixal derivation, as well as how it is registered in the main dictionaries of Portuguese language, such as: Aurélio, Houaiss, besides its increasing productivity in texts of diverse genres. In order to complete our study, we also searched for the use of a semantic approach, since many people believe that the prefix “no” only brings the base a negative meaning. We intend to show that, in fact, other meanings can be attributed to the prefix “no” and these changes of meanings are due to both the prefixal idea and the base meaning which occurs during the derivation process |
id |
UEM-3_bb1d71921f4343dbd7422db5c4918b7e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/2196 |
network_acronym_str |
UEM-3 |
network_name_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The prefix “no”: polysemy and productivity in word formation process - DOI: 10.4025/actascihumansoc.v25i1.2196O prefixo “não-”: polissemia e produtividade no processo de formação de palavras - DOI: 10.4025/actascihumansoc.v25i1.2196polissemiaprodutividadederivaçãocomposiçãosemânticaformação de palavrasDerivation and composition are among the most productive processes of our lexicon enrichment. Derivation, on its turn, is divided into prefixal and suffixal. The first one is placed before the base, while the second one is placed after it, modifying the meaning of the derivative word. These processes are the means by which new words are frequently formed and either incorporated to our lexicon or not. This paper aims at discussing how the prefix “no” has been treated within the word formation process, the prefixal derivation, as well as how it is registered in the main dictionaries of Portuguese language, such as: Aurélio, Houaiss, besides its increasing productivity in texts of diverse genres. In order to complete our study, we also searched for the use of a semantic approach, since many people believe that the prefix “no” only brings the base a negative meaning. We intend to show that, in fact, other meanings can be attributed to the prefix “no” and these changes of meanings are due to both the prefixal idea and the base meaning which occurs during the derivation processDentre os processos mais produtivos de enriquecimento do nosso léxico, encontram-se a derivação e a composição. A derivação, por sua vez, divide-se em prefixal e sufixal, sendo que, na primeira, o afixo antepõe-se à base, e, na segunda, pospõe-se, alterando o sentido do vocábulo derivado. Por meio desses processos, temos a formação freqüente de novas palavras, as quais podem ou não ser incorporadas ao nosso léxico. Este artigo pretende abordar de que forma o prefixo não vem sendo tratado dentro do processo de formação de palavras, a derivação prefixal, bem como de que forma ele é registrado nos principais dicionários da língua portuguesa, Aurélio e Houaiss, além de sua crescente produtividade em textos de diversos gêneros. Para complementar nosso estudo, procuramos, igualmente, realizar uma abordagem semântica do seu emprego, já que, para muitos, o prefixo não confere apenas sentido negativo à base. Vamos demonstrar que, na verdade, ele pode conferir-lhe outros significados que não o negativo e que essas mudanças de sentido se devem não somente ao significado desse prefixo, mas também ao significado da base no momento da derivaçãoUniversidade Estadual De Maringá2008-04-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/219610.4025/actascihumansoc.v25i1.2196Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; Vol 25 No 1 (2003); 51-57Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; v. 25 n. 1 (2003); 51-571807-86561679-7361reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMporhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/2196/1375Pante, Maria ReginaMenezes, Andréia Cristinainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-11-23T17:35:22Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/2196Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/indexPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/oai||actahuman@uem.br1807-86561679-7361opendoar:2022-11-23T17:35:22Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The prefix “no”: polysemy and productivity in word formation process - DOI: 10.4025/actascihumansoc.v25i1.2196 O prefixo “não-”: polissemia e produtividade no processo de formação de palavras - DOI: 10.4025/actascihumansoc.v25i1.2196 |
title |
The prefix “no”: polysemy and productivity in word formation process - DOI: 10.4025/actascihumansoc.v25i1.2196 |
spellingShingle |
The prefix “no”: polysemy and productivity in word formation process - DOI: 10.4025/actascihumansoc.v25i1.2196 Pante, Maria Regina polissemia produtividade derivação composição semântica formação de palavras |
title_short |
The prefix “no”: polysemy and productivity in word formation process - DOI: 10.4025/actascihumansoc.v25i1.2196 |
title_full |
The prefix “no”: polysemy and productivity in word formation process - DOI: 10.4025/actascihumansoc.v25i1.2196 |
title_fullStr |
The prefix “no”: polysemy and productivity in word formation process - DOI: 10.4025/actascihumansoc.v25i1.2196 |
title_full_unstemmed |
The prefix “no”: polysemy and productivity in word formation process - DOI: 10.4025/actascihumansoc.v25i1.2196 |
title_sort |
The prefix “no”: polysemy and productivity in word formation process - DOI: 10.4025/actascihumansoc.v25i1.2196 |
author |
Pante, Maria Regina |
author_facet |
Pante, Maria Regina Menezes, Andréia Cristina |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Menezes, Andréia Cristina |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pante, Maria Regina Menezes, Andréia Cristina |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
polissemia produtividade derivação composição semântica formação de palavras |
topic |
polissemia produtividade derivação composição semântica formação de palavras |
description |
Derivation and composition are among the most productive processes of our lexicon enrichment. Derivation, on its turn, is divided into prefixal and suffixal. The first one is placed before the base, while the second one is placed after it, modifying the meaning of the derivative word. These processes are the means by which new words are frequently formed and either incorporated to our lexicon or not. This paper aims at discussing how the prefix “no” has been treated within the word formation process, the prefixal derivation, as well as how it is registered in the main dictionaries of Portuguese language, such as: Aurélio, Houaiss, besides its increasing productivity in texts of diverse genres. In order to complete our study, we also searched for the use of a semantic approach, since many people believe that the prefix “no” only brings the base a negative meaning. We intend to show that, in fact, other meanings can be attributed to the prefix “no” and these changes of meanings are due to both the prefixal idea and the base meaning which occurs during the derivation process |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-04-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/2196 10.4025/actascihumansoc.v25i1.2196 |
url |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/2196 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4025/actascihumansoc.v25i1.2196 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciHumanSocSci/article/view/2196/1375 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual De Maringá |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual De Maringá |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; Vol 25 No 1 (2003); 51-57 Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences; v. 25 n. 1 (2003); 51-57 1807-8656 1679-7361 reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) instacron:UEM |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
instacron_str |
UEM |
institution |
UEM |
reponame_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) |
collection |
Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||actahuman@uem.br |
_version_ |
1799317507155165184 |