Reference evapotranspiration models using different time scales in the Jaboticabal region of São Paulo, Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/18277 |
Resumo: | The aim of this paper is to compare 18 reference evapotranspiration models to the standard Penman-Monteith model in the Jaboticabal, São Paulo, region for the following time scales: daily, 5-day, 15-day and seasonal. A total of 5 years of daily meteorological data was used for the following analyses: accuracy (mean absolute percentage error, Mape), precision (R2) and tendency (bias) (systematic error, SE). The results were also compared at the 95% probability level with Tukey’s test. The Priestley-Taylor (1972) method was the most accurate for all time scales, the Tanner-Pelton (1960) method was the most accurate in the winter, and the Thornthwaite (1948) method was the most accurate of the methods that only used temperature data in the equations. |
id |
UEM-5_d26f59d2c756650f70bfaf7cf3465a30 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/18277 |
network_acronym_str |
UEM-5 |
network_name_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Reference evapotranspiration models using different time scales in the Jaboticabal region of São Paulo, Brazilmodelpenman-monteithPriestley and TaylorTanner and PeltonThornthwaiteirrigação e drenagemThe aim of this paper is to compare 18 reference evapotranspiration models to the standard Penman-Monteith model in the Jaboticabal, São Paulo, region for the following time scales: daily, 5-day, 15-day and seasonal. A total of 5 years of daily meteorological data was used for the following analyses: accuracy (mean absolute percentage error, Mape), precision (R2) and tendency (bias) (systematic error, SE). The results were also compared at the 95% probability level with Tukey’s test. The Priestley-Taylor (1972) method was the most accurate for all time scales, the Tanner-Pelton (1960) method was the most accurate in the winter, and the Thornthwaite (1948) method was the most accurate of the methods that only used temperature data in the equations. Universidade Estadual de Maringá2014-11-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionmodelagemapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/1827710.4025/actasciagron.v37i1.18277Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; Vol 37 No 1 (2015); 1-9Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; v. 37 n. 1 (2015); 1-91807-86211679-9275reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMenghttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/18277/_1Caporusso, Natália BuzinaroRolim, Glauco de Souzainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-01-15T15:03:22Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/18277Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgronPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/oaiactaagron@uem.br||actaagron@uem.br|| edamasio@uem.br1807-86211679-9275opendoar:2015-01-15T15:03:22Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Reference evapotranspiration models using different time scales in the Jaboticabal region of São Paulo, Brazil |
title |
Reference evapotranspiration models using different time scales in the Jaboticabal region of São Paulo, Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Reference evapotranspiration models using different time scales in the Jaboticabal region of São Paulo, Brazil Caporusso, Natália Buzinaro model penman-monteith Priestley and Taylor Tanner and Pelton Thornthwaite irrigação e drenagem |
title_short |
Reference evapotranspiration models using different time scales in the Jaboticabal region of São Paulo, Brazil |
title_full |
Reference evapotranspiration models using different time scales in the Jaboticabal region of São Paulo, Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Reference evapotranspiration models using different time scales in the Jaboticabal region of São Paulo, Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reference evapotranspiration models using different time scales in the Jaboticabal region of São Paulo, Brazil |
title_sort |
Reference evapotranspiration models using different time scales in the Jaboticabal region of São Paulo, Brazil |
author |
Caporusso, Natália Buzinaro |
author_facet |
Caporusso, Natália Buzinaro Rolim, Glauco de Souza |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rolim, Glauco de Souza |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Caporusso, Natália Buzinaro Rolim, Glauco de Souza |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
model penman-monteith Priestley and Taylor Tanner and Pelton Thornthwaite irrigação e drenagem |
topic |
model penman-monteith Priestley and Taylor Tanner and Pelton Thornthwaite irrigação e drenagem |
description |
The aim of this paper is to compare 18 reference evapotranspiration models to the standard Penman-Monteith model in the Jaboticabal, São Paulo, region for the following time scales: daily, 5-day, 15-day and seasonal. A total of 5 years of daily meteorological data was used for the following analyses: accuracy (mean absolute percentage error, Mape), precision (R2) and tendency (bias) (systematic error, SE). The results were also compared at the 95% probability level with Tukey’s test. The Priestley-Taylor (1972) method was the most accurate for all time scales, the Tanner-Pelton (1960) method was the most accurate in the winter, and the Thornthwaite (1948) method was the most accurate of the methods that only used temperature data in the equations. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-11-25 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion modelagem |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/18277 10.4025/actasciagron.v37i1.18277 |
url |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/18277 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4025/actasciagron.v37i1.18277 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/18277/_1 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; Vol 37 No 1 (2015); 1-9 Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; v. 37 n. 1 (2015); 1-9 1807-8621 1679-9275 reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) instacron:UEM |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
instacron_str |
UEM |
institution |
UEM |
reponame_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) |
collection |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
actaagron@uem.br||actaagron@uem.br|| edamasio@uem.br |
_version_ |
1799305908883292160 |