Hilling and soil covering in bunching onion yield with two harvests - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v32i3.4379

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zárate, Néstor Antonio Heredia
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Matte, Leandro Cecílio, Vieira, Maria do Carmo, Graciano, João Dimas, Heid, Diego Menani, Helmich, Marcelo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
Texto Completo: http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/4379
Resumo: ‘Todo Ano’ bunching onion was studied and cultivated in soil without and with covering of semi-decomposed chicken manure in doses of 0 and 10 t ha-1 with 0, 1 and 2 hillings, with two harvest dates. The treatments were arranged in a 2 x 3 factorial scheme, in an experimental randomized blocks design, with five replications. Plants were harvested 64 days after planting and 40 days after the last cut (104 days after planting). The tallest (38.1 cm) and the shortest (27.2 cm) plant heights were obtained using treatments with and without covering of chicken manure and one hilling, respectively. The widest diameter of the tiller neck was 5.92 mm at 64 days after planting in with chicken manure treatments and without hilling and the smallest was 4.56 mm at 104 days after planting, in without chicken manure treatment with one hilling. The greatest yield of fresh mass was on the second harvest, in relation to the first, regardless of the studied factors. The best total income was with chicken manure treatment and with two hillings (R$ 23,511.00) because it induced a gain of R$ 2,611.00 in relation to those with one hilling, which was the worst in with chicken manure treatments, and of R$ 13,619.00 in relation to without chicken manure treatment and without hillings which induced the greatest gain in without chicken manure treatments.
id UEM-5_f399d7fda5ff74bac638dcb5ef04f7ac
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/4379
network_acronym_str UEM-5
network_name_str Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Hilling and soil covering in bunching onion yield with two harvests - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v32i3.4379Amontoas e cobertura do solo com cama-de-frango na produção de cebolinha, com duas colheitas - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v32i3.4379Allium fistulosumorganic residueculture treatmentgross incomeAllium fistulosumresíduo orgânicotrato culturalrenda brutaManejo e tratos culturais‘Todo Ano’ bunching onion was studied and cultivated in soil without and with covering of semi-decomposed chicken manure in doses of 0 and 10 t ha-1 with 0, 1 and 2 hillings, with two harvest dates. The treatments were arranged in a 2 x 3 factorial scheme, in an experimental randomized blocks design, with five replications. Plants were harvested 64 days after planting and 40 days after the last cut (104 days after planting). The tallest (38.1 cm) and the shortest (27.2 cm) plant heights were obtained using treatments with and without covering of chicken manure and one hilling, respectively. The widest diameter of the tiller neck was 5.92 mm at 64 days after planting in with chicken manure treatments and without hilling and the smallest was 4.56 mm at 104 days after planting, in without chicken manure treatment with one hilling. The greatest yield of fresh mass was on the second harvest, in relation to the first, regardless of the studied factors. The best total income was with chicken manure treatment and with two hillings (R$ 23,511.00) because it induced a gain of R$ 2,611.00 in relation to those with one hilling, which was the worst in with chicken manure treatments, and of R$ 13,619.00 in relation to without chicken manure treatment and without hillings which induced the greatest gain in without chicken manure treatments.Foi estudada a cebolinha Todo Ano, cultivada em solo sem e com 10 t ha-1 de cama-de-frango semidecomposta aplicada em cobertura e com zero, uma e duas amontoas, com duas épocas de colheita. Os tratamentos foram arranjados como fatorial 2 x 3, no delineamento experimental de blocos casualizados, com cinco repetições. As plantas foram colhidas aos 64 dias após o plantio e aos 40 dias após o corte anterior (104 dias após o plantio). A maior (38,1 cm) e a menor (27,2 cm) altura das plantas foram obtidas no tratamento com e sem cama-de-frango em cobertura e uma amontoa, respectivamente. O maior diâmetro de coleto dos perfilhos foi de 5,92 mm aos 64 dias após o plantio, no tratamento com cama-de-frango e sem amontoa e o menor foi de 4,56 mm aos 104 dias após o plantio, no tratamento sem cama-de-frango e com amontoa. A maior produção de massa fresca ocorreu na segunda colheita, em relação à primeira, independente dos fatores em estudo. A melhor renda total foi do tratamento com cama-de-frango e com duas amontoas (R$ 23.511,00), porque teria induzido lucro de R$ 2.611,00 em relação àquele com uma amontoa, que foi o pior dentro dos com cama-de-frango, e de R$ 13.619,00 em relação ao tratamento sem cama-de-frango e sem amontoas, que induziu o maior ganho nos sem cama-de-frango.Universidade Estadual de Maringá2010-08-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/437910.4025/actasciagron.v32i3.4379Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; Vol 32 No 3 (2010); 449-454Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; v. 32 n. 3 (2010); 449-4541807-86211679-9275reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMporhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/4379/4379Zárate, Néstor Antonio HerediaMatte, Leandro CecílioVieira, Maria do CarmoGraciano, João DimasHeid, Diego MenaniHelmich, Marceloinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-11-23T18:38:06Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/4379Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgronPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/oaiactaagron@uem.br||actaagron@uem.br|| edamasio@uem.br1807-86211679-9275opendoar:2022-11-23T18:38:06Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Hilling and soil covering in bunching onion yield with two harvests - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v32i3.4379
Amontoas e cobertura do solo com cama-de-frango na produção de cebolinha, com duas colheitas - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v32i3.4379
title Hilling and soil covering in bunching onion yield with two harvests - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v32i3.4379
spellingShingle Hilling and soil covering in bunching onion yield with two harvests - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v32i3.4379
Zárate, Néstor Antonio Heredia
Allium fistulosum
organic residue
culture treatment
gross income
Allium fistulosum
resíduo orgânico
trato cultural
renda bruta
Manejo e tratos culturais
title_short Hilling and soil covering in bunching onion yield with two harvests - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v32i3.4379
title_full Hilling and soil covering in bunching onion yield with two harvests - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v32i3.4379
title_fullStr Hilling and soil covering in bunching onion yield with two harvests - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v32i3.4379
title_full_unstemmed Hilling and soil covering in bunching onion yield with two harvests - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v32i3.4379
title_sort Hilling and soil covering in bunching onion yield with two harvests - doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v32i3.4379
author Zárate, Néstor Antonio Heredia
author_facet Zárate, Néstor Antonio Heredia
Matte, Leandro Cecílio
Vieira, Maria do Carmo
Graciano, João Dimas
Heid, Diego Menani
Helmich, Marcelo
author_role author
author2 Matte, Leandro Cecílio
Vieira, Maria do Carmo
Graciano, João Dimas
Heid, Diego Menani
Helmich, Marcelo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zárate, Néstor Antonio Heredia
Matte, Leandro Cecílio
Vieira, Maria do Carmo
Graciano, João Dimas
Heid, Diego Menani
Helmich, Marcelo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Allium fistulosum
organic residue
culture treatment
gross income
Allium fistulosum
resíduo orgânico
trato cultural
renda bruta
Manejo e tratos culturais
topic Allium fistulosum
organic residue
culture treatment
gross income
Allium fistulosum
resíduo orgânico
trato cultural
renda bruta
Manejo e tratos culturais
description ‘Todo Ano’ bunching onion was studied and cultivated in soil without and with covering of semi-decomposed chicken manure in doses of 0 and 10 t ha-1 with 0, 1 and 2 hillings, with two harvest dates. The treatments were arranged in a 2 x 3 factorial scheme, in an experimental randomized blocks design, with five replications. Plants were harvested 64 days after planting and 40 days after the last cut (104 days after planting). The tallest (38.1 cm) and the shortest (27.2 cm) plant heights were obtained using treatments with and without covering of chicken manure and one hilling, respectively. The widest diameter of the tiller neck was 5.92 mm at 64 days after planting in with chicken manure treatments and without hilling and the smallest was 4.56 mm at 104 days after planting, in without chicken manure treatment with one hilling. The greatest yield of fresh mass was on the second harvest, in relation to the first, regardless of the studied factors. The best total income was with chicken manure treatment and with two hillings (R$ 23,511.00) because it induced a gain of R$ 2,611.00 in relation to those with one hilling, which was the worst in with chicken manure treatments, and of R$ 13,619.00 in relation to without chicken manure treatment and without hillings which induced the greatest gain in without chicken manure treatments.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-08-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/4379
10.4025/actasciagron.v32i3.4379
url http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/4379
identifier_str_mv 10.4025/actasciagron.v32i3.4379
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/4379/4379
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Maringá
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Maringá
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; Vol 32 No 3 (2010); 449-454
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; v. 32 n. 3 (2010); 449-454
1807-8621
1679-9275
reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron:UEM
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron_str UEM
institution UEM
reponame_str Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
collection Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv actaagron@uem.br||actaagron@uem.br|| edamasio@uem.br
_version_ 1799305906961252352