How the perception of quality for beef evaluated by the buyer at the time of purchase: Study in three Brazilian cities of different sizes – Curitiba, Campo Mourão and Palotina

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Barcellos, Vinicius Cunha
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Mottin, Camila, Prado, Rodolpho Martin do, Schenkel, Tiago, Viana, Cibeli, Vital, Ana Carolina Pelaes, Bersot, Luciano dos Santos, Sañudo, Carlos, Prado, Ivanor Nunes do
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/46533
Resumo: In order to evaluate how beef buyers in the State of Paraná, Brazil south value meat quality indicators, and attributes of credibility, 519 interviews were conducted in three cities with different sizes (Big – Curitiba, Medium – Campo Mourão and Small – Palotina). The interviews were applied after the meat was placed in the shopping cart and were composed of five questions, including question of spontaneous response: (i) factors that the buyer considers at the purchasing time; (ii) information which the buyer considers important to appear on the meat label; and three questions of stimulated response: (i) preference for meat preparation and exposure for sale, (ii) factors that the buyer considers when purchasing the meat, and (iii) preference for marbling (by photograph) according to the beef preparation. The results showed that beef buyers are more concerned with extrinsic meat quality indicators than the intrinsic ones, especially the meat presentation and hygiene of the sale point; have little knowledge about the factors that positively influence the eating experience of beef and do not cares about attributes of credibility, except for the meat expiration date. Beef buyers from medium (Campo Mourão) and small (Palotina) cities have a similar behavior, and differ from the buyers of a big (Curitiba) city among the attributes surveyed, in relation to the greater appreciation of inspection, tenderness and marbling, and less importance given to the expiration date. Beef buyers prefer meat cut by the butcher; however, this preference is higher in the small city.
id UEM-7_ac4a0b14ff2097e53d286e32933c657a
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/46533
network_acronym_str UEM-7
network_name_str Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling How the perception of quality for beef evaluated by the buyer at the time of purchase: Study in three Brazilian cities of different sizes – Curitiba, Campo Mourão and Palotinaanimal productionbeef cattleBrazilmeat qualityprice.In order to evaluate how beef buyers in the State of Paraná, Brazil south value meat quality indicators, and attributes of credibility, 519 interviews were conducted in three cities with different sizes (Big – Curitiba, Medium – Campo Mourão and Small – Palotina). The interviews were applied after the meat was placed in the shopping cart and were composed of five questions, including question of spontaneous response: (i) factors that the buyer considers at the purchasing time; (ii) information which the buyer considers important to appear on the meat label; and three questions of stimulated response: (i) preference for meat preparation and exposure for sale, (ii) factors that the buyer considers when purchasing the meat, and (iii) preference for marbling (by photograph) according to the beef preparation. The results showed that beef buyers are more concerned with extrinsic meat quality indicators than the intrinsic ones, especially the meat presentation and hygiene of the sale point; have little knowledge about the factors that positively influence the eating experience of beef and do not cares about attributes of credibility, except for the meat expiration date. Beef buyers from medium (Campo Mourão) and small (Palotina) cities have a similar behavior, and differ from the buyers of a big (Curitiba) city among the attributes surveyed, in relation to the greater appreciation of inspection, tenderness and marbling, and less importance given to the expiration date. Beef buyers prefer meat cut by the butcher; however, this preference is higher in the small city.Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá2019-06-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/4653310.4025/actascianimsci.v41i1.46533Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; Vol 41 (2019): Publicação Contínua; e46533Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; v. 41 (2019): Publicação Contínua; e465331807-86721806-2636reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMenghttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/46533/pdfhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/46533/751375148193Copyright (c) 2019 Acta Scientiarum. Animal Scienceshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBarcellos, Vinicius CunhaMottin, CamilaPrado, Rodolpho Martin doSchenkel, TiagoViana, CibeliVital, Ana Carolina PelaesBersot, Luciano dos SantosSañudo, CarlosPrado, Ivanor Nunes do2019-07-17T08:32:21Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/46533Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSciPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/oaiactaanim@uem.br||actaanim@uem.br|| rev.acta@gmail.com1807-86721806-2636opendoar:2019-07-17T08:32:21Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv How the perception of quality for beef evaluated by the buyer at the time of purchase: Study in three Brazilian cities of different sizes – Curitiba, Campo Mourão and Palotina
title How the perception of quality for beef evaluated by the buyer at the time of purchase: Study in three Brazilian cities of different sizes – Curitiba, Campo Mourão and Palotina
spellingShingle How the perception of quality for beef evaluated by the buyer at the time of purchase: Study in three Brazilian cities of different sizes – Curitiba, Campo Mourão and Palotina
Barcellos, Vinicius Cunha
animal production
beef cattle
Brazil
meat quality
price.
title_short How the perception of quality for beef evaluated by the buyer at the time of purchase: Study in three Brazilian cities of different sizes – Curitiba, Campo Mourão and Palotina
title_full How the perception of quality for beef evaluated by the buyer at the time of purchase: Study in three Brazilian cities of different sizes – Curitiba, Campo Mourão and Palotina
title_fullStr How the perception of quality for beef evaluated by the buyer at the time of purchase: Study in three Brazilian cities of different sizes – Curitiba, Campo Mourão and Palotina
title_full_unstemmed How the perception of quality for beef evaluated by the buyer at the time of purchase: Study in three Brazilian cities of different sizes – Curitiba, Campo Mourão and Palotina
title_sort How the perception of quality for beef evaluated by the buyer at the time of purchase: Study in three Brazilian cities of different sizes – Curitiba, Campo Mourão and Palotina
author Barcellos, Vinicius Cunha
author_facet Barcellos, Vinicius Cunha
Mottin, Camila
Prado, Rodolpho Martin do
Schenkel, Tiago
Viana, Cibeli
Vital, Ana Carolina Pelaes
Bersot, Luciano dos Santos
Sañudo, Carlos
Prado, Ivanor Nunes do
author_role author
author2 Mottin, Camila
Prado, Rodolpho Martin do
Schenkel, Tiago
Viana, Cibeli
Vital, Ana Carolina Pelaes
Bersot, Luciano dos Santos
Sañudo, Carlos
Prado, Ivanor Nunes do
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Barcellos, Vinicius Cunha
Mottin, Camila
Prado, Rodolpho Martin do
Schenkel, Tiago
Viana, Cibeli
Vital, Ana Carolina Pelaes
Bersot, Luciano dos Santos
Sañudo, Carlos
Prado, Ivanor Nunes do
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv animal production
beef cattle
Brazil
meat quality
price.
topic animal production
beef cattle
Brazil
meat quality
price.
description In order to evaluate how beef buyers in the State of Paraná, Brazil south value meat quality indicators, and attributes of credibility, 519 interviews were conducted in three cities with different sizes (Big – Curitiba, Medium – Campo Mourão and Small – Palotina). The interviews were applied after the meat was placed in the shopping cart and were composed of five questions, including question of spontaneous response: (i) factors that the buyer considers at the purchasing time; (ii) information which the buyer considers important to appear on the meat label; and three questions of stimulated response: (i) preference for meat preparation and exposure for sale, (ii) factors that the buyer considers when purchasing the meat, and (iii) preference for marbling (by photograph) according to the beef preparation. The results showed that beef buyers are more concerned with extrinsic meat quality indicators than the intrinsic ones, especially the meat presentation and hygiene of the sale point; have little knowledge about the factors that positively influence the eating experience of beef and do not cares about attributes of credibility, except for the meat expiration date. Beef buyers from medium (Campo Mourão) and small (Palotina) cities have a similar behavior, and differ from the buyers of a big (Curitiba) city among the attributes surveyed, in relation to the greater appreciation of inspection, tenderness and marbling, and less importance given to the expiration date. Beef buyers prefer meat cut by the butcher; however, this preference is higher in the small city.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-06-14
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/46533
10.4025/actascianimsci.v41i1.46533
url https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/46533
identifier_str_mv 10.4025/actascianimsci.v41i1.46533
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/46533/pdf
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/46533/751375148193
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; Vol 41 (2019): Publicação Contínua; e46533
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; v. 41 (2019): Publicação Contínua; e46533
1807-8672
1806-2636
reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron:UEM
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron_str UEM
institution UEM
reponame_str Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
collection Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv actaanim@uem.br||actaanim@uem.br|| rev.acta@gmail.com
_version_ 1799315362819342336