How the perception of quality for beef evaluated by the buyer at the time of purchase: Study in three Brazilian cities of different sizes – Curitiba, Campo Mourão and Palotina
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/46533 |
Resumo: | In order to evaluate how beef buyers in the State of Paraná, Brazil south value meat quality indicators, and attributes of credibility, 519 interviews were conducted in three cities with different sizes (Big – Curitiba, Medium – Campo Mourão and Small – Palotina). The interviews were applied after the meat was placed in the shopping cart and were composed of five questions, including question of spontaneous response: (i) factors that the buyer considers at the purchasing time; (ii) information which the buyer considers important to appear on the meat label; and three questions of stimulated response: (i) preference for meat preparation and exposure for sale, (ii) factors that the buyer considers when purchasing the meat, and (iii) preference for marbling (by photograph) according to the beef preparation. The results showed that beef buyers are more concerned with extrinsic meat quality indicators than the intrinsic ones, especially the meat presentation and hygiene of the sale point; have little knowledge about the factors that positively influence the eating experience of beef and do not cares about attributes of credibility, except for the meat expiration date. Beef buyers from medium (Campo Mourão) and small (Palotina) cities have a similar behavior, and differ from the buyers of a big (Curitiba) city among the attributes surveyed, in relation to the greater appreciation of inspection, tenderness and marbling, and less importance given to the expiration date. Beef buyers prefer meat cut by the butcher; however, this preference is higher in the small city. |
id |
UEM-7_ac4a0b14ff2097e53d286e32933c657a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/46533 |
network_acronym_str |
UEM-7 |
network_name_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
How the perception of quality for beef evaluated by the buyer at the time of purchase: Study in three Brazilian cities of different sizes – Curitiba, Campo Mourão and Palotinaanimal productionbeef cattleBrazilmeat qualityprice.In order to evaluate how beef buyers in the State of Paraná, Brazil south value meat quality indicators, and attributes of credibility, 519 interviews were conducted in three cities with different sizes (Big – Curitiba, Medium – Campo Mourão and Small – Palotina). The interviews were applied after the meat was placed in the shopping cart and were composed of five questions, including question of spontaneous response: (i) factors that the buyer considers at the purchasing time; (ii) information which the buyer considers important to appear on the meat label; and three questions of stimulated response: (i) preference for meat preparation and exposure for sale, (ii) factors that the buyer considers when purchasing the meat, and (iii) preference for marbling (by photograph) according to the beef preparation. The results showed that beef buyers are more concerned with extrinsic meat quality indicators than the intrinsic ones, especially the meat presentation and hygiene of the sale point; have little knowledge about the factors that positively influence the eating experience of beef and do not cares about attributes of credibility, except for the meat expiration date. Beef buyers from medium (Campo Mourão) and small (Palotina) cities have a similar behavior, and differ from the buyers of a big (Curitiba) city among the attributes surveyed, in relation to the greater appreciation of inspection, tenderness and marbling, and less importance given to the expiration date. Beef buyers prefer meat cut by the butcher; however, this preference is higher in the small city.Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá2019-06-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/4653310.4025/actascianimsci.v41i1.46533Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; Vol 41 (2019): Publicação Contínua; e46533Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; v. 41 (2019): Publicação Contínua; e465331807-86721806-2636reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMenghttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/46533/pdfhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/46533/751375148193Copyright (c) 2019 Acta Scientiarum. Animal Scienceshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBarcellos, Vinicius CunhaMottin, CamilaPrado, Rodolpho Martin doSchenkel, TiagoViana, CibeliVital, Ana Carolina PelaesBersot, Luciano dos SantosSañudo, CarlosPrado, Ivanor Nunes do2019-07-17T08:32:21Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/46533Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSciPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/oaiactaanim@uem.br||actaanim@uem.br|| rev.acta@gmail.com1807-86721806-2636opendoar:2019-07-17T08:32:21Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
How the perception of quality for beef evaluated by the buyer at the time of purchase: Study in three Brazilian cities of different sizes – Curitiba, Campo Mourão and Palotina |
title |
How the perception of quality for beef evaluated by the buyer at the time of purchase: Study in three Brazilian cities of different sizes – Curitiba, Campo Mourão and Palotina |
spellingShingle |
How the perception of quality for beef evaluated by the buyer at the time of purchase: Study in three Brazilian cities of different sizes – Curitiba, Campo Mourão and Palotina Barcellos, Vinicius Cunha animal production beef cattle Brazil meat quality price. |
title_short |
How the perception of quality for beef evaluated by the buyer at the time of purchase: Study in three Brazilian cities of different sizes – Curitiba, Campo Mourão and Palotina |
title_full |
How the perception of quality for beef evaluated by the buyer at the time of purchase: Study in three Brazilian cities of different sizes – Curitiba, Campo Mourão and Palotina |
title_fullStr |
How the perception of quality for beef evaluated by the buyer at the time of purchase: Study in three Brazilian cities of different sizes – Curitiba, Campo Mourão and Palotina |
title_full_unstemmed |
How the perception of quality for beef evaluated by the buyer at the time of purchase: Study in three Brazilian cities of different sizes – Curitiba, Campo Mourão and Palotina |
title_sort |
How the perception of quality for beef evaluated by the buyer at the time of purchase: Study in three Brazilian cities of different sizes – Curitiba, Campo Mourão and Palotina |
author |
Barcellos, Vinicius Cunha |
author_facet |
Barcellos, Vinicius Cunha Mottin, Camila Prado, Rodolpho Martin do Schenkel, Tiago Viana, Cibeli Vital, Ana Carolina Pelaes Bersot, Luciano dos Santos Sañudo, Carlos Prado, Ivanor Nunes do |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mottin, Camila Prado, Rodolpho Martin do Schenkel, Tiago Viana, Cibeli Vital, Ana Carolina Pelaes Bersot, Luciano dos Santos Sañudo, Carlos Prado, Ivanor Nunes do |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Barcellos, Vinicius Cunha Mottin, Camila Prado, Rodolpho Martin do Schenkel, Tiago Viana, Cibeli Vital, Ana Carolina Pelaes Bersot, Luciano dos Santos Sañudo, Carlos Prado, Ivanor Nunes do |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
animal production beef cattle Brazil meat quality price. |
topic |
animal production beef cattle Brazil meat quality price. |
description |
In order to evaluate how beef buyers in the State of Paraná, Brazil south value meat quality indicators, and attributes of credibility, 519 interviews were conducted in three cities with different sizes (Big – Curitiba, Medium – Campo Mourão and Small – Palotina). The interviews were applied after the meat was placed in the shopping cart and were composed of five questions, including question of spontaneous response: (i) factors that the buyer considers at the purchasing time; (ii) information which the buyer considers important to appear on the meat label; and three questions of stimulated response: (i) preference for meat preparation and exposure for sale, (ii) factors that the buyer considers when purchasing the meat, and (iii) preference for marbling (by photograph) according to the beef preparation. The results showed that beef buyers are more concerned with extrinsic meat quality indicators than the intrinsic ones, especially the meat presentation and hygiene of the sale point; have little knowledge about the factors that positively influence the eating experience of beef and do not cares about attributes of credibility, except for the meat expiration date. Beef buyers from medium (Campo Mourão) and small (Palotina) cities have a similar behavior, and differ from the buyers of a big (Curitiba) city among the attributes surveyed, in relation to the greater appreciation of inspection, tenderness and marbling, and less importance given to the expiration date. Beef buyers prefer meat cut by the butcher; however, this preference is higher in the small city. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-06-14 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/46533 10.4025/actascianimsci.v41i1.46533 |
url |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/46533 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4025/actascianimsci.v41i1.46533 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/46533/pdf https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/46533/751375148193 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; Vol 41 (2019): Publicação Contínua; e46533 Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; v. 41 (2019): Publicação Contínua; e46533 1807-8672 1806-2636 reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) instacron:UEM |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
instacron_str |
UEM |
institution |
UEM |
reponame_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) |
collection |
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
actaanim@uem.br||actaanim@uem.br|| rev.acta@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799315362819342336 |