Burnout Inventory for Referees (BIR): psychometric properties for Brazilian soccer referees
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Journal of Physical Education (Maringá) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/47778 |
Resumo: | The objective of the study is to analyze the psychometric measurements of the Burnout Inventory for Referees (BIR) offering validity evidence of the instrument through the analysis of its internal structure, estimating reliability indicators and comparing the total score of Burnout in referees and assistant referees. Participants were 284 soccer referees from six Brazilian states. The mean age was 31.3 years old (±6.1), being 255 male participants (89.7%), and the average experience time of the referees was 6.9 years (±5.5 years). The BIR consists of a questionnaire of 9 items, arranged on a 7 points likert scale. The result of the exploratory factor analysis pointed to one factor that explained 53.1% of the data variance. The Comparative Fit Index = 0.923 (95% CI 0.883-0.950) and Non-Normed Fit Index = 0.897 (95% CI 0.844-0.933) indicates suitability to a single-factor. There was no burnout difference between referees and assistant referees. The instrument presented a reliability index (McDonald´s omega) of 0.823. It is concluded that the factor structure of BIR´s version for Brazilian referees focuses on a single dimension that guided the development of the instrument. This result is also different from that found in other studies carried out previously using the instrument. |
id |
UEM-9_a76124f2e71424c8231756e2555f38b2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/47778 |
network_acronym_str |
UEM-9 |
network_name_str |
Journal of Physical Education (Maringá) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Burnout Inventory for Referees (BIR): psychometric properties for Brazilian soccer refereesInventário de Burnout para Árbitros (BIR): propriedades psicométricas para árbitros brasileiros de futebolburnoutvalidation studysoccerstresspsychologicalesgotamento profissionalanálise fatorialárbitrosInventário de Burnout para ÁrbitrosThe objective of the study is to analyze the psychometric measurements of the Burnout Inventory for Referees (BIR) offering validity evidence of the instrument through the analysis of its internal structure, estimating reliability indicators and comparing the total score of Burnout in referees and assistant referees. Participants were 284 soccer referees from six Brazilian states. The mean age was 31.3 years old (±6.1), being 255 male participants (89.7%), and the average experience time of the referees was 6.9 years (±5.5 years). The BIR consists of a questionnaire of 9 items, arranged on a 7 points likert scale. The result of the exploratory factor analysis pointed to one factor that explained 53.1% of the data variance. The Comparative Fit Index = 0.923 (95% CI 0.883-0.950) and Non-Normed Fit Index = 0.897 (95% CI 0.844-0.933) indicates suitability to a single-factor. There was no burnout difference between referees and assistant referees. The instrument presented a reliability index (McDonald´s omega) of 0.823. It is concluded that the factor structure of BIR´s version for Brazilian referees focuses on a single dimension that guided the development of the instrument. This result is also different from that found in other studies carried out previously using the instrument.O objetivo do estudo é analisar as propriedades psicométricas do Inventário de Burnout para Árbitros (BIR) oferecendo evidências de validade do instrumento por meio da análise de sua estrutura interna, estimando indicadores de confiabilidade e comparar o escore total de Burnout em árbitros centrais e árbitros assistentes. Participaram 284 árbitros de futebol de seis Estados brasileiros. A idade média foi 31,3 anos(±6,1), sendo 255 do sexo masculino (89,7 %) e tempo de experiência na arbitragem médio 6,9 anos (±5,5 anos). O BIR consiste em um questionário de 9 itens, dispostos em uma escala likert de 7 pontos. O resultado da análise fatorial exploratória apontou para a presença de um fator que explicou 53,1% da variância dos dados. O ajuste do modelo Comparative Fit Index = 0,923 (IC de 95% 0,883-0,950) e Non-Normed Fit Index = 0,897 (IC de 95% 0,844- 0,933), indicam adequação do modelo de um fator único. Não houve diferença de burnout entre árbitros assistentes e centrais. O instrumento apresentou índice de confiabilidade ômega de McDonald = 0,823. Conclui-se que o BIR apresenta estrutura fatorial centrada na dimensão exaustão física e emocional, diferente do seu modelo inicialmente proposto, e de outros estudos realizados anteriormente com o instrumento.Department of Physical Education - State University of Maringá (UEM), Maringá-PR, Brazil2020-11-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/4777810.4025/jphyseduc.v32i1.3212Journal of Physical Education; Vol 32 No 1 (2021): Journal of Physical Education; e-3212Journal of Physical Education; Vol. 32 Núm. 1 (2021): Journal of Physical Education; e-3212Journal of Physical Education; v. 32 n. 1 (2021): Journal of Physical Education; e-32122448-2455reponame:Journal of Physical Education (Maringá)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMenghttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/47778/751375150991Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Physical Educationhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Talita RochaBicalho, Camila Cristina FonsecaMonteiro, Alessandra PeixotoBrandão, Maria Regina FerreiraAlves, Marcela Mansur2021-10-25T13:02:04Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/47778Revistahttp://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/indexPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revdef@uem.br2448-24552448-2455opendoar:2021-10-25T13:02:04Journal of Physical Education (Maringá) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Burnout Inventory for Referees (BIR): psychometric properties for Brazilian soccer referees Inventário de Burnout para Árbitros (BIR): propriedades psicométricas para árbitros brasileiros de futebol |
title |
Burnout Inventory for Referees (BIR): psychometric properties for Brazilian soccer referees |
spellingShingle |
Burnout Inventory for Referees (BIR): psychometric properties for Brazilian soccer referees Santos, Talita Rocha burnout validation study soccer stress psychological esgotamento profissional análise fatorial árbitros Inventário de Burnout para Árbitros |
title_short |
Burnout Inventory for Referees (BIR): psychometric properties for Brazilian soccer referees |
title_full |
Burnout Inventory for Referees (BIR): psychometric properties for Brazilian soccer referees |
title_fullStr |
Burnout Inventory for Referees (BIR): psychometric properties for Brazilian soccer referees |
title_full_unstemmed |
Burnout Inventory for Referees (BIR): psychometric properties for Brazilian soccer referees |
title_sort |
Burnout Inventory for Referees (BIR): psychometric properties for Brazilian soccer referees |
author |
Santos, Talita Rocha |
author_facet |
Santos, Talita Rocha Bicalho, Camila Cristina Fonseca Monteiro, Alessandra Peixoto Brandão, Maria Regina Ferreira Alves, Marcela Mansur |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bicalho, Camila Cristina Fonseca Monteiro, Alessandra Peixoto Brandão, Maria Regina Ferreira Alves, Marcela Mansur |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos, Talita Rocha Bicalho, Camila Cristina Fonseca Monteiro, Alessandra Peixoto Brandão, Maria Regina Ferreira Alves, Marcela Mansur |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
burnout validation study soccer stress psychological esgotamento profissional análise fatorial árbitros Inventário de Burnout para Árbitros |
topic |
burnout validation study soccer stress psychological esgotamento profissional análise fatorial árbitros Inventário de Burnout para Árbitros |
description |
The objective of the study is to analyze the psychometric measurements of the Burnout Inventory for Referees (BIR) offering validity evidence of the instrument through the analysis of its internal structure, estimating reliability indicators and comparing the total score of Burnout in referees and assistant referees. Participants were 284 soccer referees from six Brazilian states. The mean age was 31.3 years old (±6.1), being 255 male participants (89.7%), and the average experience time of the referees was 6.9 years (±5.5 years). The BIR consists of a questionnaire of 9 items, arranged on a 7 points likert scale. The result of the exploratory factor analysis pointed to one factor that explained 53.1% of the data variance. The Comparative Fit Index = 0.923 (95% CI 0.883-0.950) and Non-Normed Fit Index = 0.897 (95% CI 0.844-0.933) indicates suitability to a single-factor. There was no burnout difference between referees and assistant referees. The instrument presented a reliability index (McDonald´s omega) of 0.823. It is concluded that the factor structure of BIR´s version for Brazilian referees focuses on a single dimension that guided the development of the instrument. This result is also different from that found in other studies carried out previously using the instrument. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-11-13 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/47778 10.4025/jphyseduc.v32i1.3212 |
url |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/47778 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4025/jphyseduc.v32i1.3212 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/47778/751375150991 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Physical Education https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Physical Education https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Department of Physical Education - State University of Maringá (UEM), Maringá-PR, Brazil |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Department of Physical Education - State University of Maringá (UEM), Maringá-PR, Brazil |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Physical Education; Vol 32 No 1 (2021): Journal of Physical Education; e-3212 Journal of Physical Education; Vol. 32 Núm. 1 (2021): Journal of Physical Education; e-3212 Journal of Physical Education; v. 32 n. 1 (2021): Journal of Physical Education; e-3212 2448-2455 reponame:Journal of Physical Education (Maringá) instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) instacron:UEM |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
instacron_str |
UEM |
institution |
UEM |
reponame_str |
Journal of Physical Education (Maringá) |
collection |
Journal of Physical Education (Maringá) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Physical Education (Maringá) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revdef@uem.br |
_version_ |
1754732546083520512 |