Does it still make sense to talk about political forgiveness?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Eva Hamammé
Data de Publicação: 2024
Outros Autores: Sebastián Peredo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Maracanan (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/maracanan/article/view/83674
Resumo: Does it make sense to talk about political forgiveness in the 21st century? Throughout this paper we maintain that it is possible to claim a political sense of forgiveness that, in practice, has been overshadowed by the various amnesty laws implemented in recent decades in the Latin American context that constitute a misuse of forgiveness. Based on the reflections of Hannah Arendt and Jacques Derrida on forgiveness, in conjunction with the postulates of J. L. Austin and J. Searle’s speech act theories, we acknowledge a sense of political forgiveness that substantially differs from amnesty. In order to do this, we identify both procedural and contextual conditions that must be taken into consideration. When these conditions are met, forgiveness can be regarded to be an act of true political reconciliation.
id UERJ-19_6a8b5aafa0b3885320b38cb112cbf51c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br:article/83674
network_acronym_str UERJ-19
network_name_str Revista Maracanan (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Does it still make sense to talk about political forgiveness?Faz sentido ainda falar em perdão político?Perdão políticoAnistiaReconciliaçãoDanoPolitical forgivenessAmnestyReconciliationHarmDoes it make sense to talk about political forgiveness in the 21st century? Throughout this paper we maintain that it is possible to claim a political sense of forgiveness that, in practice, has been overshadowed by the various amnesty laws implemented in recent decades in the Latin American context that constitute a misuse of forgiveness. Based on the reflections of Hannah Arendt and Jacques Derrida on forgiveness, in conjunction with the postulates of J. L. Austin and J. Searle’s speech act theories, we acknowledge a sense of political forgiveness that substantially differs from amnesty. In order to do this, we identify both procedural and contextual conditions that must be taken into consideration. When these conditions are met, forgiveness can be regarded to be an act of true political reconciliation.Faz sentido falar em perdão político no século XXI? Nós mantemos a ideia de que é possível reivindicar um sentido político do perdão que, nas últimas décadas na América Latina, tem sido eclipsado por leis de anistia que, ao nosso critério, constituem um abuso do perdão. A partir das reflexões sobre o perdão feitas por Hannah Arendt e Jacques Derrida, e aplicando postulados da teoria dos atos de fala de J.L. Austin e J. Searle, este artigo propõe-se a resgatar um sentido do perdão político que se diferencia substantivamente da anistia. Para tanto, são identificadas as condições procedimentais e contextuais que tornam possível a contribuição do perdão para um ato de verdadeira reconciliação política.Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro2024-05-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/maracanan/article/view/83674Revista Maracanan; n. 35 (2024): Tema Livre; 348-3622359-00921807-989Xreponame:Revista Maracanan (Online)instname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)instacron:UERJporhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/maracanan/article/view/83674/50076Copyright (c) 2024 Eva Hamammé, Sebastián Peredohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEva HamamméSebastián Peredo2024-05-17T03:32:18Zoai:ojs.www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br:article/83674Revistahttp://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/maracananPUBhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/maracanan/oairevista.maracanan@gmail.com||revista.maracanan@gmail.com2359-00921807-989Xopendoar:2024-05-17T03:32:18Revista Maracanan (Online) - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Does it still make sense to talk about political forgiveness?
Faz sentido ainda falar em perdão político?
title Does it still make sense to talk about political forgiveness?
spellingShingle Does it still make sense to talk about political forgiveness?
Eva Hamammé
Perdão político
Anistia
Reconciliação
Dano
Political forgiveness
Amnesty
Reconciliation
Harm
title_short Does it still make sense to talk about political forgiveness?
title_full Does it still make sense to talk about political forgiveness?
title_fullStr Does it still make sense to talk about political forgiveness?
title_full_unstemmed Does it still make sense to talk about political forgiveness?
title_sort Does it still make sense to talk about political forgiveness?
author Eva Hamammé
author_facet Eva Hamammé
Sebastián Peredo
author_role author
author2 Sebastián Peredo
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Eva Hamammé
Sebastián Peredo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Perdão político
Anistia
Reconciliação
Dano
Political forgiveness
Amnesty
Reconciliation
Harm
topic Perdão político
Anistia
Reconciliação
Dano
Political forgiveness
Amnesty
Reconciliation
Harm
description Does it make sense to talk about political forgiveness in the 21st century? Throughout this paper we maintain that it is possible to claim a political sense of forgiveness that, in practice, has been overshadowed by the various amnesty laws implemented in recent decades in the Latin American context that constitute a misuse of forgiveness. Based on the reflections of Hannah Arendt and Jacques Derrida on forgiveness, in conjunction with the postulates of J. L. Austin and J. Searle’s speech act theories, we acknowledge a sense of political forgiveness that substantially differs from amnesty. In order to do this, we identify both procedural and contextual conditions that must be taken into consideration. When these conditions are met, forgiveness can be regarded to be an act of true political reconciliation.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-05-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/maracanan/article/view/83674
url https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/maracanan/article/view/83674
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/maracanan/article/view/83674/50076
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Eva Hamammé, Sebastián Peredo
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Eva Hamammé, Sebastián Peredo
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Maracanan; n. 35 (2024): Tema Livre; 348-362
2359-0092
1807-989X
reponame:Revista Maracanan (Online)
instname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
instacron:UERJ
instname_str Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
instacron_str UERJ
institution UERJ
reponame_str Revista Maracanan (Online)
collection Revista Maracanan (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Maracanan (Online) - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista.maracanan@gmail.com||revista.maracanan@gmail.com
_version_ 1799317568654147584