THIRD PARTY INTERVENTION IN INCIDENTS OF JUDICIAL PREVIOUS DECISIONS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Amaral, Felipe Marinho
Data de Publicação: 2014
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UERJ
Texto Completo: https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/rfduerj/article/view/7418
Resumo: The current study has the objective to analyze the possibility of a third partyintervention in incidents of judicial precedents, which does not have a legal provision inBrazil yet. The Brazilian legal system has been reformed gradually in order to concedebinding or persuasive efficacy to certain precedents, creating influence on other proceduresrelated to a similar legal relationship. The stare decisis theory, already used by the CommonLaw, influences a lot of changes in the Brazilian Law, which leads to the necessity of a deeperstudy about the judicial precedent theory. However, the mentioned reforms have deficienciesthat must be outnumbered by the doctrine. Consequently, it is important to notice thepossibility of third party intervention on procedures to fixate thesis before legal courts, withthe intention to match the precedents theory with constitutional principles, such as the duelegal process, the full defense and the contradictory. It is the creation of a new modality ofintervention, considered sui generis, that must follow established requisites, like thelegitimacy and the interest, under penalty of disorganizing the mentioned procedures.
id UERJ-20_964f3b2f1a8e98f783464b417cbf8b4b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br:article/7418
network_acronym_str UERJ-20
network_name_str Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UERJ
repository_id_str
spelling THIRD PARTY INTERVENTION IN INCIDENTS OF JUDICIAL PREVIOUS DECISIONSINTERVENÇÃO DE TERCEIROS NOS INCIDENTES DE FORMAÇÃO DE PRECEDENTES / THIRD PARTY INTERVENTION IN INCIDENTS OF JUDICIAL PREVIOUS DECISIONSCivil Procedure LawThird party interventionAmicus CuriaeJudicialIntervenção de TerceirosPrecedentes JudiciaisPrecedentes JudiciaisThe current study has the objective to analyze the possibility of a third partyintervention in incidents of judicial precedents, which does not have a legal provision inBrazil yet. The Brazilian legal system has been reformed gradually in order to concedebinding or persuasive efficacy to certain precedents, creating influence on other proceduresrelated to a similar legal relationship. The stare decisis theory, already used by the CommonLaw, influences a lot of changes in the Brazilian Law, which leads to the necessity of a deeperstudy about the judicial precedent theory. However, the mentioned reforms have deficienciesthat must be outnumbered by the doctrine. Consequently, it is important to notice thepossibility of third party intervention on procedures to fixate thesis before legal courts, withthe intention to match the precedents theory with constitutional principles, such as the duelegal process, the full defense and the contradictory. It is the creation of a new modality ofintervention, considered sui generis, that must follow established requisites, like thelegitimacy and the interest, under penalty of disorganizing the mentioned procedures.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12957/10.12957/rfd.2014.7418O presente artigo tem como objetivo analisar a possibilidade do terceiro intervir em incidentes de formação de precedentes, possibilidade esta que, atualmente, não possui previsão legal no Brasil. O ordenamento brasileiro vem, gradativamente, realizando reformas pontuais, no sentido de conceder eficácia vinculante ou persuasiva a determinados precedentes, influenciando ou determinando outros processos que tratam de relações jurídicas semelhantes. Desta forma, entende-se que a teoria do stare decisis, já utilizada pelo common law, vem influenciando as modificações realizadas no Direito Brasileiro, sendo necessário um maior estudo acerca da teoria do precedente judicial. No entanto, as referidas reformas pontuais possuem lacunas que devem ser preenchidas pela doutrina. E, sendo assim, destaca-se a importância de se atentar para possibilidade de o terceiro intervir em procedimentos de fixação de teses perante os Tribunais, com o objetivo de adequar a teoria dos precedentes a princípios constitucionais, como o do devido processo legal, o da ampla defesa e do contraditório. Trata-se, portanto, acerca da criação de uma modalidade de intervenção, considerada sui generis, que deve cumprir requisitos estabelecidos, como o da legitimidade e o interesse, sob pena de tumultuar os mencionados procedimentos.Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro2014-12-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/rfduerj/article/view/741810.12957/rfd.2014.7418Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UERJ; No. 26 (2014): Revista da Faculdade de Direito de UERJ-RFD; 74-94Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UERJ - RFD; n. 26 (2014): Revista da Faculdade de Direito de UERJ-RFD; 74-942236-3475reponame:Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UERJinstname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)instacron:UERJporenghttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/rfduerj/article/view/7418/10753https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/rfduerj/article/view/7418/10827Amaral, Felipe Marinhoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-04-27T18:11:21Zoai:ojs.www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br:article/7418Revistahttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/rfduerjPUBhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/rfduerj/oairfd.uerj@gmail.com||carolvestena@gmail.com|| vauthierborges@yahoo.com.br2236-34752236-3475opendoar:2023-04-27T18:11:21Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UERJ - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv THIRD PARTY INTERVENTION IN INCIDENTS OF JUDICIAL PREVIOUS DECISIONS
INTERVENÇÃO DE TERCEIROS NOS INCIDENTES DE FORMAÇÃO DE PRECEDENTES / THIRD PARTY INTERVENTION IN INCIDENTS OF JUDICIAL PREVIOUS DECISIONS
title THIRD PARTY INTERVENTION IN INCIDENTS OF JUDICIAL PREVIOUS DECISIONS
spellingShingle THIRD PARTY INTERVENTION IN INCIDENTS OF JUDICIAL PREVIOUS DECISIONS
Amaral, Felipe Marinho
Civil Procedure Law
Third party intervention
Amicus Curiae
Judicial
Intervenção de Terceiros
Precedentes Judiciais
Precedentes Judiciais
title_short THIRD PARTY INTERVENTION IN INCIDENTS OF JUDICIAL PREVIOUS DECISIONS
title_full THIRD PARTY INTERVENTION IN INCIDENTS OF JUDICIAL PREVIOUS DECISIONS
title_fullStr THIRD PARTY INTERVENTION IN INCIDENTS OF JUDICIAL PREVIOUS DECISIONS
title_full_unstemmed THIRD PARTY INTERVENTION IN INCIDENTS OF JUDICIAL PREVIOUS DECISIONS
title_sort THIRD PARTY INTERVENTION IN INCIDENTS OF JUDICIAL PREVIOUS DECISIONS
author Amaral, Felipe Marinho
author_facet Amaral, Felipe Marinho
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Amaral, Felipe Marinho
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Civil Procedure Law
Third party intervention
Amicus Curiae
Judicial
Intervenção de Terceiros
Precedentes Judiciais
Precedentes Judiciais
topic Civil Procedure Law
Third party intervention
Amicus Curiae
Judicial
Intervenção de Terceiros
Precedentes Judiciais
Precedentes Judiciais
description The current study has the objective to analyze the possibility of a third partyintervention in incidents of judicial precedents, which does not have a legal provision inBrazil yet. The Brazilian legal system has been reformed gradually in order to concedebinding or persuasive efficacy to certain precedents, creating influence on other proceduresrelated to a similar legal relationship. The stare decisis theory, already used by the CommonLaw, influences a lot of changes in the Brazilian Law, which leads to the necessity of a deeperstudy about the judicial precedent theory. However, the mentioned reforms have deficienciesthat must be outnumbered by the doctrine. Consequently, it is important to notice thepossibility of third party intervention on procedures to fixate thesis before legal courts, withthe intention to match the precedents theory with constitutional principles, such as the duelegal process, the full defense and the contradictory. It is the creation of a new modality ofintervention, considered sui generis, that must follow established requisites, like thelegitimacy and the interest, under penalty of disorganizing the mentioned procedures.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-12-19
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/rfduerj/article/view/7418
10.12957/rfd.2014.7418
url https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/rfduerj/article/view/7418
identifier_str_mv 10.12957/rfd.2014.7418
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/rfduerj/article/view/7418/10753
https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/rfduerj/article/view/7418/10827
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UERJ; No. 26 (2014): Revista da Faculdade de Direito de UERJ-RFD; 74-94
Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UERJ - RFD; n. 26 (2014): Revista da Faculdade de Direito de UERJ-RFD; 74-94
2236-3475
reponame:Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UERJ
instname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
instacron:UERJ
instname_str Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
instacron_str UERJ
institution UERJ
reponame_str Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UERJ
collection Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UERJ
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UERJ - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rfd.uerj@gmail.com||carolvestena@gmail.com|| vauthierborges@yahoo.com.br
_version_ 1799317548311773184

Registros relacionados