Processo orçamentário e comportamento Legislativo: emendas individuais, apoio ao Executivo e programas de governo
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2005 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociais |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0011-52582005000400002 |
Resumo: | The article challenges the contention that individual amendments are crucial for a system of exchanging favors with the Administration by members of Congress interested in distributive policies as a way of guaranteeing their reelection. By analyzing funds allocated through Congressional amendments, their distribution in different government programs, and roll-call votes in the Brazilian House of Representatives from 1996 to 2001, the authors show that: individual amendments are not prioritized either by Congress in the budget's approval or by the Administration in its implementation; there are no differences between the agenda dictated by the Administration and that of the legislators; and party affiliation explains both House floor votes and the implementation of individual amendments and is thus an explanatory variable in the Executive-Legislative relationship. |
id |
UERJ-23_99bf80616ce5bf45ff55545fcdcc9ef6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0011-52582005000400002 |
network_acronym_str |
UERJ-23 |
network_name_str |
Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociais |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Processo orçamentário e comportamento Legislativo: emendas individuais, apoio ao Executivo e programas de governobudgetExecutive BranchLegislative behaviorbudget amendmentsThe article challenges the contention that individual amendments are crucial for a system of exchanging favors with the Administration by members of Congress interested in distributive policies as a way of guaranteeing their reelection. By analyzing funds allocated through Congressional amendments, their distribution in different government programs, and roll-call votes in the Brazilian House of Representatives from 1996 to 2001, the authors show that: individual amendments are not prioritized either by Congress in the budget's approval or by the Administration in its implementation; there are no differences between the agenda dictated by the Administration and that of the legislators; and party affiliation explains both House floor votes and the implementation of individual amendments and is thus an explanatory variable in the Executive-Legislative relationship.Instituto de Estudos Sociais e Políticos (IESP) da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)2005-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0011-52582005000400002Dados v.48 n.4 2005reponame:Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociaisinstname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)instacron:UERJ10.1590/S0011-52582005000400002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLimongi,FernandoFigueiredo,Argelinapor2008-03-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0011-52582005000400002Revistahttp://dados.iesp.uerj.br/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||dados@iesp.uerj.br1678-45880011-5258opendoar:2008-03-07T00:00Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociais - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Processo orçamentário e comportamento Legislativo: emendas individuais, apoio ao Executivo e programas de governo |
title |
Processo orçamentário e comportamento Legislativo: emendas individuais, apoio ao Executivo e programas de governo |
spellingShingle |
Processo orçamentário e comportamento Legislativo: emendas individuais, apoio ao Executivo e programas de governo Limongi,Fernando budget Executive Branch Legislative behavior budget amendments |
title_short |
Processo orçamentário e comportamento Legislativo: emendas individuais, apoio ao Executivo e programas de governo |
title_full |
Processo orçamentário e comportamento Legislativo: emendas individuais, apoio ao Executivo e programas de governo |
title_fullStr |
Processo orçamentário e comportamento Legislativo: emendas individuais, apoio ao Executivo e programas de governo |
title_full_unstemmed |
Processo orçamentário e comportamento Legislativo: emendas individuais, apoio ao Executivo e programas de governo |
title_sort |
Processo orçamentário e comportamento Legislativo: emendas individuais, apoio ao Executivo e programas de governo |
author |
Limongi,Fernando |
author_facet |
Limongi,Fernando Figueiredo,Argelina |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Figueiredo,Argelina |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Limongi,Fernando Figueiredo,Argelina |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
budget Executive Branch Legislative behavior budget amendments |
topic |
budget Executive Branch Legislative behavior budget amendments |
description |
The article challenges the contention that individual amendments are crucial for a system of exchanging favors with the Administration by members of Congress interested in distributive policies as a way of guaranteeing their reelection. By analyzing funds allocated through Congressional amendments, their distribution in different government programs, and roll-call votes in the Brazilian House of Representatives from 1996 to 2001, the authors show that: individual amendments are not prioritized either by Congress in the budget's approval or by the Administration in its implementation; there are no differences between the agenda dictated by the Administration and that of the legislators; and party affiliation explains both House floor votes and the implementation of individual amendments and is thus an explanatory variable in the Executive-Legislative relationship. |
publishDate |
2005 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2005-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0011-52582005000400002 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0011-52582005000400002 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0011-52582005000400002 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Estudos Sociais e Políticos (IESP) da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Estudos Sociais e Políticos (IESP) da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Dados v.48 n.4 2005 reponame:Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociais instname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) instacron:UERJ |
instname_str |
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) |
instacron_str |
UERJ |
institution |
UERJ |
reponame_str |
Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociais |
collection |
Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociais |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociais - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||dados@iesp.uerj.br |
_version_ |
1750312647930150912 |