Joseph Raz on conceptual analysis: a critical engagement
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/quaestioiuris/article/view/66839 |
Resumo: | In this essay, I intend to engage critically with Joseph Raz’s views on the concept and the nature of law. In the second section, I present a summary of the razian argument. Then, I make two thrusts against Raz’s theses. In the third section, I will argue that from the concept of law we cannot presume anything about the nature of law, nor can we be very confident about the existence of something as a nature of law. In the fourth section, I will argue that our concept of law does not have the criterial structure Raz attributes to it, or that at least he fails to present reasons in favor of his view. This is so because he ignores the many concepts of law that we have due to the plurality of language-games we participate, and because he fails deflect what I will call the “problem of demarcation”. |
id |
UERJ-8_5dcc1a50747eab88343b75c900a43847 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br:article/66839 |
network_acronym_str |
UERJ-8 |
network_name_str |
Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Joseph Raz on conceptual analysis: a critical engagementJoseph Razanálise conceitualinterpretaçãodebate metodológicoLudwig WittgensteinRonald DworkinFilosofia do DireitoIn this essay, I intend to engage critically with Joseph Raz’s views on the concept and the nature of law. In the second section, I present a summary of the razian argument. Then, I make two thrusts against Raz’s theses. In the third section, I will argue that from the concept of law we cannot presume anything about the nature of law, nor can we be very confident about the existence of something as a nature of law. In the fourth section, I will argue that our concept of law does not have the criterial structure Raz attributes to it, or that at least he fails to present reasons in favor of his view. This is so because he ignores the many concepts of law that we have due to the plurality of language-games we participate, and because he fails deflect what I will call the “problem of demarcation”.Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro2023-03-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por paresapplication/pdfhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/quaestioiuris/article/view/6683910.12957/rqi.2023.66839REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS; v. 16 n. 1 (2023): REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS - VOL. 16, N°01; 259-2801516-03511807-8389reponame:Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)instacron:UERJporhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/quaestioiuris/article/view/66839/45425Copyright (c) 2023 REVISTA QUAESTIO IURISinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMurata, Daniel Peixoto2023-12-23T16:06:44Zoai:ojs.www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br:article/66839Revistahttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/quaestioiurisPUBhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/quaestioiuris/oaidanielqueiroz_uerj@infolink.com.br||revistaquaestiojuris@gmail.com1516-03511516-0351opendoar:2023-12-23T16:06:44Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online) - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Joseph Raz on conceptual analysis: a critical engagement |
title |
Joseph Raz on conceptual analysis: a critical engagement |
spellingShingle |
Joseph Raz on conceptual analysis: a critical engagement Murata, Daniel Peixoto Joseph Raz análise conceitual interpretação debate metodológico Ludwig Wittgenstein Ronald Dworkin Filosofia do Direito |
title_short |
Joseph Raz on conceptual analysis: a critical engagement |
title_full |
Joseph Raz on conceptual analysis: a critical engagement |
title_fullStr |
Joseph Raz on conceptual analysis: a critical engagement |
title_full_unstemmed |
Joseph Raz on conceptual analysis: a critical engagement |
title_sort |
Joseph Raz on conceptual analysis: a critical engagement |
author |
Murata, Daniel Peixoto |
author_facet |
Murata, Daniel Peixoto |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Murata, Daniel Peixoto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Joseph Raz análise conceitual interpretação debate metodológico Ludwig Wittgenstein Ronald Dworkin Filosofia do Direito |
topic |
Joseph Raz análise conceitual interpretação debate metodológico Ludwig Wittgenstein Ronald Dworkin Filosofia do Direito |
description |
In this essay, I intend to engage critically with Joseph Raz’s views on the concept and the nature of law. In the second section, I present a summary of the razian argument. Then, I make two thrusts against Raz’s theses. In the third section, I will argue that from the concept of law we cannot presume anything about the nature of law, nor can we be very confident about the existence of something as a nature of law. In the fourth section, I will argue that our concept of law does not have the criterial structure Raz attributes to it, or that at least he fails to present reasons in favor of his view. This is so because he ignores the many concepts of law that we have due to the plurality of language-games we participate, and because he fails deflect what I will call the “problem of demarcation”. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-03-28 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/quaestioiuris/article/view/66839 10.12957/rqi.2023.66839 |
url |
https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/quaestioiuris/article/view/66839 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.12957/rqi.2023.66839 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/quaestioiuris/article/view/66839/45425 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS; v. 16 n. 1 (2023): REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS - VOL. 16, N°01; 259-280 1516-0351 1807-8389 reponame:Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online) instname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) instacron:UERJ |
instname_str |
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) |
instacron_str |
UERJ |
institution |
UERJ |
reponame_str |
Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online) |
collection |
Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online) - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
danielqueiroz_uerj@infolink.com.br||revistaquaestiojuris@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799318560659472384 |