Joseph Raz on conceptual analysis: a critical engagement

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Murata, Daniel Peixoto
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/quaestioiuris/article/view/66839
Resumo: In this essay, I intend to engage critically with Joseph Raz’s views on the concept and the nature of law. In the second section, I present a summary of the razian argument. Then, I make two thrusts against Raz’s theses. In the third section, I will argue that from the concept of law we cannot presume anything about the nature of law, nor can we be very confident about the existence of something as a nature of law. In the fourth section, I will argue that our concept of law does not have the criterial structure Raz attributes to it, or that at least he fails to present reasons in favor of his view. This is so because he ignores the many concepts of law that we have due to the plurality of language-games we participate, and because he fails deflect what I will call the “problem of demarcation”.
id UERJ-8_5dcc1a50747eab88343b75c900a43847
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br:article/66839
network_acronym_str UERJ-8
network_name_str Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Joseph Raz on conceptual analysis: a critical engagementJoseph Razanálise conceitualinterpretaçãodebate metodológicoLudwig WittgensteinRonald DworkinFilosofia do DireitoIn this essay, I intend to engage critically with Joseph Raz’s views on the concept and the nature of law. In the second section, I present a summary of the razian argument. Then, I make two thrusts against Raz’s theses. In the third section, I will argue that from the concept of law we cannot presume anything about the nature of law, nor can we be very confident about the existence of something as a nature of law. In the fourth section, I will argue that our concept of law does not have the criterial structure Raz attributes to it, or that at least he fails to present reasons in favor of his view. This is so because he ignores the many concepts of law that we have due to the plurality of language-games we participate, and because he fails deflect what I will call the “problem of demarcation”.Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro2023-03-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por paresapplication/pdfhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/quaestioiuris/article/view/6683910.12957/rqi.2023.66839REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS; v. 16 n. 1 (2023): REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS - VOL. 16, N°01; 259-2801516-03511807-8389reponame:Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)instacron:UERJporhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/quaestioiuris/article/view/66839/45425Copyright (c) 2023 REVISTA QUAESTIO IURISinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMurata, Daniel Peixoto2023-12-23T16:06:44Zoai:ojs.www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br:article/66839Revistahttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/quaestioiurisPUBhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/quaestioiuris/oaidanielqueiroz_uerj@infolink.com.br||revistaquaestiojuris@gmail.com1516-03511516-0351opendoar:2023-12-23T16:06:44Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online) - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Joseph Raz on conceptual analysis: a critical engagement
title Joseph Raz on conceptual analysis: a critical engagement
spellingShingle Joseph Raz on conceptual analysis: a critical engagement
Murata, Daniel Peixoto
Joseph Raz
análise conceitual
interpretação
debate metodológico
Ludwig Wittgenstein
Ronald Dworkin
Filosofia do Direito
title_short Joseph Raz on conceptual analysis: a critical engagement
title_full Joseph Raz on conceptual analysis: a critical engagement
title_fullStr Joseph Raz on conceptual analysis: a critical engagement
title_full_unstemmed Joseph Raz on conceptual analysis: a critical engagement
title_sort Joseph Raz on conceptual analysis: a critical engagement
author Murata, Daniel Peixoto
author_facet Murata, Daniel Peixoto
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Murata, Daniel Peixoto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Joseph Raz
análise conceitual
interpretação
debate metodológico
Ludwig Wittgenstein
Ronald Dworkin
Filosofia do Direito
topic Joseph Raz
análise conceitual
interpretação
debate metodológico
Ludwig Wittgenstein
Ronald Dworkin
Filosofia do Direito
description In this essay, I intend to engage critically with Joseph Raz’s views on the concept and the nature of law. In the second section, I present a summary of the razian argument. Then, I make two thrusts against Raz’s theses. In the third section, I will argue that from the concept of law we cannot presume anything about the nature of law, nor can we be very confident about the existence of something as a nature of law. In the fourth section, I will argue that our concept of law does not have the criterial structure Raz attributes to it, or that at least he fails to present reasons in favor of his view. This is so because he ignores the many concepts of law that we have due to the plurality of language-games we participate, and because he fails deflect what I will call the “problem of demarcation”.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-03-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/quaestioiuris/article/view/66839
10.12957/rqi.2023.66839
url https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/quaestioiuris/article/view/66839
identifier_str_mv 10.12957/rqi.2023.66839
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/quaestioiuris/article/view/66839/45425
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS; v. 16 n. 1 (2023): REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS - VOL. 16, N°01; 259-280
1516-0351
1807-8389
reponame:Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online)
instname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
instacron:UERJ
instname_str Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
instacron_str UERJ
institution UERJ
reponame_str Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online)
collection Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online) - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv danielqueiroz_uerj@infolink.com.br||revistaquaestiojuris@gmail.com
_version_ 1799318560659472384