Inovação tecnológica: análise comparativa entre dois métodos de coleta de dados sobre riscos e danos em enfermagem

• Autor(a) principal: Gomes, Helena Ferraz
• Data de Publicação: 2014
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UERJ
• Texto Completo: http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/handle/1/11384
• topic: Technological innovation; Nursing; Occupational health; Occupational risk; Inovação tecnológica; Enfermagem; Saúde do trabalhador; Risco ocupacional; CNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::ENFERMAGEM

Study comparing two data collection methods through the use of software for the evaluation of risk and injury factors in nursing work in the hospital. It aims to analyze the use of the software (electronic) compared with the use of the printed instrument. This is a statistical, descriptive study with a quantitative approach, developed in the wards of Inpatient Clinical Services and Inpatient Surgical Services at a University Hospital in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The study population consisted of nursing unit staff. The sample was defined by non - probabilistic sampling and allocation of the sample was randomly split into two groups called "printed group and "electronic group", with 52 participants each. Prior to data collection strategies were implemented teaser called research, through digital communications workers. Later it was offered to the participants of print printed questionnaire, and participants of electronic received an access link to the home page. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. After the questionnaire in two formats, we obtained 47 response workers "printed group" (90.3%), and 17 of employees electronic group" (32.7%). The application of printed questionnaire revealed some advantages such as the number of people affected by the research , most researcher and participant interaction, higher rate of return, and the disadvantages to the more time consuming, transcription errors, formulation database, possibilities blank answer and filing errors. In electronic format advantages include ease of tabulation and analysis of data, failure of non-response, clean and fast methodology, disadvantages and how the internet access in the period of data collection, learn to use the computer and lower response rate. Both groups noted that the questionnaire had good instructions and easy to understand, and required a short time to answer. The workers perceive the existence of occupational hazards, especially ergonomic, biological and accidents. The main injury to health caused by work injuries or workers noticed the musculoskeletal problems, stress, sleep disorders, mood swings and changes in behavior and varicose veins. It can be stated that there were no significant differences in percentage by comparing the perceptions of workers "printed group and the "electronic group" against risks and damage to health. It was concluded that both data collection processes were well accepted, however, the application of electronic questionnaire should be indicated along with the access tool, being a computer or tablet.