Preparos endodônticos minimamente invasivos: construção de bases científicas

• Autor(a) principal: Barbosa, Ana Flávia Almeida
• Data de Publicação: 2022
• Outros Autores: [e-mail]
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UERJ
• Texto Completo: http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/handle/1/19077
• topic: Ultraconservative Access Cavity; Cavidade de acesso ultraconservadora; Conicidade; Microtomografia de Raios-X; Microtrincas dentinárias; Preparo do canal radicular; Taper; X-Ray; Microtomography; Dentinal microcracks; Root Canal Preparation; CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::ODONTOLOGIA

The concept of Minimally Invasive Endodontics is broad, and involves not only the realization of accesses, but also the use of instruments with reduced tapers or innovative geometries. Seeking to assess whether the minimally invasive strategies adopted have advantages over traditional treatments, this thesis was divided into three studies. Study 1 evaluated the preservation of periradicular dentin and enlargement of the apical portion of the mandibular molar canals prepared with TruNatomy and ProTaper Gold instruments. For this, twenty lower molars were microtomography, paired and divided into 2 groups. In the ProTaper Gold group, the mesial and distal canals were prepared up to the F2 and F3 instruments, respectively, while in the TruNatomy group, the mesial and distal canals were prepared up to the prime and medium instruments, respectively. After a new scan, the instrumentation parameters were calculated. Data were analyzed by Mann-Whitney, T Student and non-metric multidimensional scaling tests. No differences were found between groups regarding unprepared area and dentin thickness reduction. The ProTaper Gold group removed more dentin than TruNatomy in the coronal third of the mesial roots. Study 2 evaluated the formation of dentinal microcracks in mandibular molars accessed by ultraconservative cavites (UltraAC), instrumented with Reciproc and XP-Endo Shaper. Forty lower molars were microtomography, paired and divided into 4 groups according to the type of access cavity and instrumentation system protocol: traditional/Reciproc; traditional/XP-endo Shaper; UltraAC/Reciproc and UltraAC/XP-endo Shaper. After the root canal preparations, the teeth were scanned again and the transverse images of the mesial and distal roots, from the furcation level to the apex, were evaluated in order to identify the presence of dentinal microcracks. In all groups, the microcracks seen in the postoperative images were already present in the preoperative examination. Study 3 evaluated the influence of instruments with the same tip diameter and different tapers on the percentage of unprepared area and volume of dentin removed after preparation of the mesiobuccal and distobuccal canals of maxillary molars with or without the mesiobuccal canal 2 (MV2). Twenty-two maxillary molars were selected, microtomography, paired and classified into two groups, according to root anatomy: teeth with MV2 and teeth without MV2. After access, the root canals were prepared with instruments 25/.01, 25/.03, 25/.05, 25/.06 and 25/.08v. The teeth were rescanned by micro-CT after preparation with each instrument described above. Data were analyzed using the Generalized Linear Mixed Model and Kenward-Roger approximation for Wald F tests. In teeth with and without MV2 canals, the percentage of unprepared area showed a significant decrease throughout the treatment after each instrument used and the percentage of removed dentin showed a significant increase during treatment. Based on the studies, it was concluded that the minimally invasive strategies adopted did not present advantages over traditional treatments.