Ministério Público resolutivo e acesso à justiça: fundamentos e instrumentos extrajudiciais de tutela de direitos transindividuais
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UERJ |
Texto Completo: | http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/handle/1/19655 |
Resumo: | The present research is dedicated to the study of the extrajudicial performance of the brazilian Public Prosecutor's Office in matters of collective redress, a field in which two opposing models of action are erected: the demandist paradigm, representative of the ideals that the member is a mere procedural agent and that, for this reason, the solution of the issues brought to the Parquet by society should be transferred to the Judiciary; and the resolutive paradigm, which, differently, embraces the understandings that the member is also a political agent and that, as a result of this facet of ministerial action, a de-jurisdictionalization of its procedure is required, through the implementation of direct solutions to the problems to which it must respond. The general objective of this paper is to investigate whether it is possible to sustain the existence of a functional duty to promote self-composition by the Public Prosecutor's Office and, if so, on what grounds and what contours such duty would take. Its specific objectives, on the other hand, consist of: (i) scrutinize the repositioning and the re-signification of the principle of access to justice in the Brazilian legal system; (ii) identify whether the state jurisdiction in Brazil is undergoing a crisis and, if so, its main components and unfoldings; (iii) examine the particularities surrounding the brazilian collective redress, especially regarding the limitations of the achievement of transindividual rights through the judicial path and the difficulties inherent to the self-composition in this arena; (iv) to analyze the historical background and the evolution of the institutional profile of the brazilian Public Prosecutor's Office, as well as to compare the opposing models of ministerial action that arise in the context of collective redress; (v) to study the main instruments and techniques available to the Public Prosecutor's Office for the extrajudicial protection of collective rights; (vi) to outline possible parameters for ministerial action in the context of extrajudicial collective redress. In order to achieve the abovementioned objectives, this work uses the hypothetical-deductive scientific method and a quantitative-quantitative approach, which will be made possible through the use of the following research techniques: (i) bibliographical, consisting of a review of specialized literature concerning the chosen themes; (ii) documental, consisting of a survey of secondary documents, including technical and quantitative reports of the CNMP and CNJ; and (iii) case study, consisting of the selection, description and analysis of a representative case of the Public Prosecutor's Office acting in the context of collective redress. The purpose of this methodology is to test and falsify the following hypothesis, which guides the studies undertaken here: in face of the re-signification of access to justice and the insufficiencies from which the judicial process suffers, it is imposed on the Public Prosecutor's Office a functional duty to stimulate consensuality for the resolution of conflicts, especially those that have as object transindividual rights, because, having at its disposal a broad and efficient toolbox aimed at this end, the Public Prosecutor's Office is responsible for acting resolutely, with priority in the extrajudicial path, in order to bypass the negative externalities of the justice crisis. Conclusively, the existence of this duty is verified and sustained, outlining its content, its compatibility with functional independence and its normative bases. |
id |
UERJ_d5217ebe5d58d4ec86ef0cf09cd0538e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.bdtd.uerj.br:1/19655 |
network_acronym_str |
UERJ |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UERJ |
repository_id_str |
2903 |
spelling |
Roque, Andre Vasconceloshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4615090489449715Schenk, Leonardo Fariahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6445339129455509Zaneti Junior, Hermeshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/5343355826023519http://lattes.cnpq.br/8913923513657336Duarte, Matheus Prestes Tavaresmatheusprestestd@gmail.com2023-05-26T17:19:56Z2025-04-172023-03-22DUARTE, Matheus Prestes Tavares. Ministério Público resolutivo e acesso à justiça: fundamentos e instrumentos extrajudiciais de tutela de direitos transindividuais. 2023. 217 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Faculdade de Direito, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 2023.http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/handle/1/19655The present research is dedicated to the study of the extrajudicial performance of the brazilian Public Prosecutor's Office in matters of collective redress, a field in which two opposing models of action are erected: the demandist paradigm, representative of the ideals that the member is a mere procedural agent and that, for this reason, the solution of the issues brought to the Parquet by society should be transferred to the Judiciary; and the resolutive paradigm, which, differently, embraces the understandings that the member is also a political agent and that, as a result of this facet of ministerial action, a de-jurisdictionalization of its procedure is required, through the implementation of direct solutions to the problems to which it must respond. The general objective of this paper is to investigate whether it is possible to sustain the existence of a functional duty to promote self-composition by the Public Prosecutor's Office and, if so, on what grounds and what contours such duty would take. Its specific objectives, on the other hand, consist of: (i) scrutinize the repositioning and the re-signification of the principle of access to justice in the Brazilian legal system; (ii) identify whether the state jurisdiction in Brazil is undergoing a crisis and, if so, its main components and unfoldings; (iii) examine the particularities surrounding the brazilian collective redress, especially regarding the limitations of the achievement of transindividual rights through the judicial path and the difficulties inherent to the self-composition in this arena; (iv) to analyze the historical background and the evolution of the institutional profile of the brazilian Public Prosecutor's Office, as well as to compare the opposing models of ministerial action that arise in the context of collective redress; (v) to study the main instruments and techniques available to the Public Prosecutor's Office for the extrajudicial protection of collective rights; (vi) to outline possible parameters for ministerial action in the context of extrajudicial collective redress. In order to achieve the abovementioned objectives, this work uses the hypothetical-deductive scientific method and a quantitative-quantitative approach, which will be made possible through the use of the following research techniques: (i) bibliographical, consisting of a review of specialized literature concerning the chosen themes; (ii) documental, consisting of a survey of secondary documents, including technical and quantitative reports of the CNMP and CNJ; and (iii) case study, consisting of the selection, description and analysis of a representative case of the Public Prosecutor's Office acting in the context of collective redress. The purpose of this methodology is to test and falsify the following hypothesis, which guides the studies undertaken here: in face of the re-signification of access to justice and the insufficiencies from which the judicial process suffers, it is imposed on the Public Prosecutor's Office a functional duty to stimulate consensuality for the resolution of conflicts, especially those that have as object transindividual rights, because, having at its disposal a broad and efficient toolbox aimed at this end, the Public Prosecutor's Office is responsible for acting resolutely, with priority in the extrajudicial path, in order to bypass the negative externalities of the justice crisis. Conclusively, the existence of this duty is verified and sustained, outlining its content, its compatibility with functional independence and its normative bases.Público brasileiro em sede de tutela coletiva, seara em que se erigem dois modelos contrapostos de atuação: o paradigma demandista, representativo dos ideais de que o membro é um mero agente processual e de que, em virtude disso, deve haver uma transferência, ao Poder Judiciário, da solução das questões postas ao Parquet pela sociedade; e o paradigma resolutivo, que, diversamente, alberga as compreensões de que o membro é também um agente político e de que, em decorrência dessa faceta de atuação ministerial, se impõe uma desjurisdicionalização de seu proceder, mediante a implementação de soluções diretas aos problemas e anseios a que deve responder. O objetivo geral deste trabalho é investigar se é possível sustentar a existência de um dever funcional de fomento à autocomposição por parte do Ministério Público e, em caso positivo, quais fundamentos embasariam e quais contornos assumiria o referido dever. Seus objetivos específicos, lado outro, consistem em: (i) perscrutar o reposicionamento e a ressignificação do princípio do acesso à justiça no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro; (ii) identificar se a jurisdição estatal brasileira perpassa uma crise e, em caso positivo, descrever seus principais componentes e desdobramentos; (iii) examinar as particularidades que circundam a tutela coletiva brasileira, especialmente no que tange às limitações da consecução dos direitos transindividuais pela via judicial e às dificuldades inerentes à autocomposição nessa seara; (iv) analisar os antecedentes históricos e a evolução do perfil institucional do Ministério Público brasileiro, bem como comparar os contrapostos modelos de atuação ministerial que se erigem em sede de tutela coletiva; (v) estudar os principais instrumentos e técnicas de que dispõe o Ministério Público para a tutela de direitos metaindividuais pela via extrajudicial; (vi) traçar possíveis parâmetros à atuação ministerial em sede de tutela coletiva extrajudicial. Para a consecução dos retromencionados objetivos, adotar-se-ão o método científico hipotético-dedutivo e uma abordagem quanti-qualitativa, a ser viabilizada pelo emprego de técnicas de pesquisa: (i) bibliográfica, consistente em revisão da literatura especializada concernente aos temas eleitos; (ii) documental, consistente no levantamento de documentos secundários, entre os quais relatórios técnicos e quantitativos do CNMP e do CNJ; e de (iii) estudo de caso, consistente na seleção, descrição e análise de caso representativo da atuação ministerial em sede de tutela coletiva. Buscar-se-á, assim, pelo emprego da aludida metodologia, testar e falsear a seguinte hipótese, norteadora dos estudos ora empreendidos: em face da ressignificação do acesso à justiça e das insuficiências de que padece o processo judicial, impõe-se ao Ministério Público um dever funcional de estímulo à consensualidade para a resolução de conflitos, especialmente daqueles que tenham por objeto direitos metaindividuais, porquanto, dispondo de amplo e eficiente instrumentário voltado a esse fim, ao Parquet incumbe atuar resolutivamente, com prioridade na via extrajudicial, de modo a contornar as externalidades negativas da crise da justiça. Conclusivamente, constata-se e sustenta-se a existência do referido dever, delineando-se seu conteúdo, sua compatibilização com a independência funcional e seus fundamentos normativos.Submitted by Laura CCS/C (laurassdo@outlook.com) on 2023-05-26T17:19:56Z No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Matheus Prestes Tavares Duarte - 2023 - Parcial.pdf: 414930 bytes, checksum: 28d165686258f281fbb943a15bf0064d (MD5) Dissertação - Matheus Prestes Tavares Duarte - 2023 - Completa.pdf: 1468268 bytes, checksum: dae1afdc95c7d62e450faf6d5305d344 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2023-05-26T17:19:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Matheus Prestes Tavares Duarte - 2023 - Parcial.pdf: 414930 bytes, checksum: 28d165686258f281fbb943a15bf0064d (MD5) Dissertação - Matheus Prestes Tavares Duarte - 2023 - Completa.pdf: 1468268 bytes, checksum: dae1afdc95c7d62e450faf6d5305d344 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2023-03-22application/pdfporUniversidade do Estado do Rio de JaneiroPrograma de Pós-Graduação em DireitoUERJBrasilCentro de Ciências Sociais::Faculdade de DireitoAccess to justicePublic Prosecutor's OfficeResolutivityExtrajudicial collective redressAcesso à justiçaMinistério PúblicoResolutividadeTutela coletiva extrajudicialCIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO PROCESSUAL CIVILMinistério Público resolutivo e acesso à justiça: fundamentos e instrumentos extrajudiciais de tutela de direitos transindividuaisResolutive Public Prosecutor’s Office and access to justice: grounds and extrajudicial instruments for the protection of transindividual rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UERJinstname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)instacron:UERJORIGINALDissertação - Matheus Prestes Tavares Duarte - 2023 - Parcial.pdfDissertação - Matheus Prestes Tavares Duarte - 2023 - Parcial.pdfapplication/pdf414930http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/bitstream/1/19655/2/Disserta%C3%A7%C3%A3o+-+Matheus+Prestes+Tavares+Duarte+-+2023+-+Parcial.pdf28d165686258f281fbb943a15bf0064dMD52Dissertação - Matheus Prestes Tavares Duarte - 2023 - Completa.pdfDissertação - Matheus Prestes Tavares Duarte - 2023 - Completa.pdfapplication/pdf1468268http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/bitstream/1/19655/3/Disserta%C3%A7%C3%A3o+-+Matheus+Prestes+Tavares+Duarte+-+2023+-+Completa.pdfdae1afdc95c7d62e450faf6d5305d344MD53LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82123http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/bitstream/1/19655/1/license.txte5502652da718045d7fcd832b79fca29MD511/196552024-02-27 13:52:41.092oai:www.bdtd.uerj.br:1/19655Tk9UQTogTElDRU7Dh0EgUkVERSBTSVJJVVMKRXN0YSBsaWNlbsOnYSBkZSBleGVtcGxvIMOpIGZvcm5lY2lkYSBhcGVuYXMgcGFyYSBmaW5zIGluZm9ybWF0aXZvcy4KCkxJQ0VOw4dBIERFIERJU1RSSUJVScOHw4NPIE7Dg08tRVhDTFVTSVZBCgpDb20gYSBhcHJlc2VudGHDp8OjbyBkZXN0YSBsaWNlbsOnYSwgdm9jw6ogKG8gYXV0b3IgKGVzKSBvdSBvIHRpdHVsYXIgZG9zIGRpcmVpdG9zIGRlIGF1dG9yKSBjb25jZWRlIMOgIFVuaXZlcnNpZGFkZSAKZG8gRXN0YWRvIGRvIFJpbyBkZSBKYW5laXJvIChVRVJKKSBvIGRpcmVpdG8gbsOjby1leGNsdXNpdm8gZGUgcmVwcm9kdXppciwgIHRyYWR1emlyIChjb25mb3JtZSBkZWZpbmlkbyBhYmFpeG8pLCBlL291IApkaXN0cmlidWlyIGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyAoaW5jbHVpbmRvIG8gcmVzdW1vKSBwb3IgdG9kbyBvIG11bmRvIG5vIGZvcm1hdG8gaW1wcmVzc28gZSBlbGV0csO0bmljbyBlIAplbSBxdWFscXVlciBtZWlvLCBpbmNsdWluZG8gb3MgZm9ybWF0b3Mgw6F1ZGlvIG91IHbDrWRlby4KClZvY8OqIGNvbmNvcmRhIHF1ZSBhIFVFUkogcG9kZSwgc2VtIGFsdGVyYXIgbyBjb250ZcO6ZG8sIHRyYW5zcG9yIGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyAKcGFyYSBxdWFscXVlciBtZWlvIG91IGZvcm1hdG8gcGFyYSBmaW5zIGRlIHByZXNlcnZhw6fDo28uCgpWb2PDqiB0YW1iw6ltIGNvbmNvcmRhIHF1ZSBhIFVFUkogcG9kZSBtYW50ZXIgbWFpcyBkZSB1bWEgY8OzcGlhIGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgCmRpc3NlcnRhw6fDo28gcGFyYSBmaW5zIGRlIHNlZ3VyYW7Dp2EsIGJhY2stdXAgZSBwcmVzZXJ2YcOnw6NvLgoKVm9jw6ogZGVjbGFyYSBxdWUgYSBzdWEgdGVzZSBvdSBkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvIMOpIG9yaWdpbmFsIGUgcXVlIHZvY8OqIHRlbSBvIHBvZGVyIGRlIGNvbmNlZGVyIG9zIGRpcmVpdG9zIGNvbnRpZG9zIApuZXN0YSBsaWNlbsOnYS4gVm9jw6ogdGFtYsOpbSBkZWNsYXJhIHF1ZSBvIGRlcMOzc2l0byBkYSBzdWEgdGVzZSBvdSBkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvIG7Do28sIHF1ZSBzZWphIGRlIHNldSAKY29uaGVjaW1lbnRvLCBpbmZyaW5nZSBkaXJlaXRvcyBhdXRvcmFpcyBkZSBuaW5ndcOpbS4KCkNhc28gYSBzdWEgdGVzZSBvdSBkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvIGNvbnRlbmhhIG1hdGVyaWFsIHF1ZSB2b2PDqiBuw6NvIHBvc3N1aSBhIHRpdHVsYXJpZGFkZSBkb3MgZGlyZWl0b3MgYXV0b3JhaXMsIHZvY8OqIApkZWNsYXJhIHF1ZSBvYnRldmUgYSBwZXJtaXNzw6NvIGlycmVzdHJpdGEgZG8gZGV0ZW50b3IgZG9zIGRpcmVpdG9zIGF1dG9yYWlzIHBhcmEgY29uY2VkZXIgw6AgVUVSSiBvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBhcHJlc2VudGFkb3MgbmVzdGEgbGljZW7Dp2EsIGUgcXVlIGVzc2UgbWF0ZXJpYWwgZGUgcHJvcHJpZWRhZGUgZGUgdGVyY2Vpcm9zIGVzdMOhIGNsYXJhbWVudGUgCmlkZW50aWZpY2FkbyBlIHJlY29uaGVjaWRvIG5vIHRleHRvIG91IG5vIGNvbnRlw7pkbyBkYSB0ZXNlIG91IGRpc3NlcnRhw6fDo28gb3JhIGRlcG9zaXRhZGEuCgpDQVNPIEEgVEVTRSBPVSBESVNTRVJUQcOHw4NPIE9SQSBERVBPU0lUQURBIFRFTkhBIFNJRE8gUkVTVUxUQURPIERFIFVNIFBBVFJPQ8ONTklPIE9VIApBUE9JTyBERSBVTUEgQUfDik5DSUEgREUgRk9NRU5UTyBPVSBPVVRSTyBPUkdBTklTTU8gUVVFIE7Dg08gU0VKQSBFU1RBClVOSVZFUlNJREFERSwgVk9Dw4ogREVDTEFSQSBRVUUgUkVTUEVJVE9VIFRPRE9TIEUgUVVBSVNRVUVSIERJUkVJVE9TIERFIFJFVklTw4NPIENPTU8gClRBTULDiU0gQVMgREVNQUlTIE9CUklHQcOHw5VFUyBFWElHSURBUyBQT1IgQ09OVFJBVE8gT1UgQUNPUkRPLgoKQSBVbml2ZXJzaWRhZGUgZG8gRXN0YWRvIGRvIFJpbyBkZSBKYW5laXJvIChVRVJKKSBzZSBjb21wcm9tZXRlIGEgaWRlbnRpZmljYXIgY2xhcmFtZW50ZSBvIHNldSBub21lIChzKSBvdSBvKHMpIG5vbWUocykgZG8ocykgCmRldGVudG9yKGVzKSBkb3MgZGlyZWl0b3MgYXV0b3JhaXMgZGEgdGVzZSBvdSBkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvLCBlIG7Do28gZmFyw6EgcXVhbHF1ZXIgYWx0ZXJhw6fDo28sIGFsw6ltIGRhcXVlbGFzIApjb25jZWRpZGFzIHBvciBlc3RhIGxpY2Vuw6dhLgo=Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://www.bdtd.uerj.br/PUBhttps://www.bdtd.uerj.br:8443/oai/requestbdtd.suporte@uerj.bropendoar:29032024-02-27T16:52:41Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UERJ - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Ministério Público resolutivo e acesso à justiça: fundamentos e instrumentos extrajudiciais de tutela de direitos transindividuais |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Resolutive Public Prosecutor’s Office and access to justice: grounds and extrajudicial instruments for the protection of transindividual rights |
title |
Ministério Público resolutivo e acesso à justiça: fundamentos e instrumentos extrajudiciais de tutela de direitos transindividuais |
spellingShingle |
Ministério Público resolutivo e acesso à justiça: fundamentos e instrumentos extrajudiciais de tutela de direitos transindividuais Duarte, Matheus Prestes Tavares Access to justice Public Prosecutor's Office Resolutivity Extrajudicial collective redress Acesso à justiça Ministério Público Resolutividade Tutela coletiva extrajudicial CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO PROCESSUAL CIVIL |
title_short |
Ministério Público resolutivo e acesso à justiça: fundamentos e instrumentos extrajudiciais de tutela de direitos transindividuais |
title_full |
Ministério Público resolutivo e acesso à justiça: fundamentos e instrumentos extrajudiciais de tutela de direitos transindividuais |
title_fullStr |
Ministério Público resolutivo e acesso à justiça: fundamentos e instrumentos extrajudiciais de tutela de direitos transindividuais |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ministério Público resolutivo e acesso à justiça: fundamentos e instrumentos extrajudiciais de tutela de direitos transindividuais |
title_sort |
Ministério Público resolutivo e acesso à justiça: fundamentos e instrumentos extrajudiciais de tutela de direitos transindividuais |
author |
Duarte, Matheus Prestes Tavares |
author_facet |
Duarte, Matheus Prestes Tavares matheusprestestd@gmail.com |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
matheusprestestd@gmail.com |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Roque, Andre Vasconcelos |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/4615090489449715 |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
Schenk, Leonardo Faria |
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/6445339129455509 |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
Zaneti Junior, Hermes |
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/5343355826023519 |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/8913923513657336 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Duarte, Matheus Prestes Tavares matheusprestestd@gmail.com |
contributor_str_mv |
Roque, Andre Vasconcelos Schenk, Leonardo Faria Zaneti Junior, Hermes |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Access to justice Public Prosecutor's Office Resolutivity Extrajudicial collective redress |
topic |
Access to justice Public Prosecutor's Office Resolutivity Extrajudicial collective redress Acesso à justiça Ministério Público Resolutividade Tutela coletiva extrajudicial CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO PROCESSUAL CIVIL |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Acesso à justiça Ministério Público Resolutividade Tutela coletiva extrajudicial |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO PROCESSUAL CIVIL |
description |
The present research is dedicated to the study of the extrajudicial performance of the brazilian Public Prosecutor's Office in matters of collective redress, a field in which two opposing models of action are erected: the demandist paradigm, representative of the ideals that the member is a mere procedural agent and that, for this reason, the solution of the issues brought to the Parquet by society should be transferred to the Judiciary; and the resolutive paradigm, which, differently, embraces the understandings that the member is also a political agent and that, as a result of this facet of ministerial action, a de-jurisdictionalization of its procedure is required, through the implementation of direct solutions to the problems to which it must respond. The general objective of this paper is to investigate whether it is possible to sustain the existence of a functional duty to promote self-composition by the Public Prosecutor's Office and, if so, on what grounds and what contours such duty would take. Its specific objectives, on the other hand, consist of: (i) scrutinize the repositioning and the re-signification of the principle of access to justice in the Brazilian legal system; (ii) identify whether the state jurisdiction in Brazil is undergoing a crisis and, if so, its main components and unfoldings; (iii) examine the particularities surrounding the brazilian collective redress, especially regarding the limitations of the achievement of transindividual rights through the judicial path and the difficulties inherent to the self-composition in this arena; (iv) to analyze the historical background and the evolution of the institutional profile of the brazilian Public Prosecutor's Office, as well as to compare the opposing models of ministerial action that arise in the context of collective redress; (v) to study the main instruments and techniques available to the Public Prosecutor's Office for the extrajudicial protection of collective rights; (vi) to outline possible parameters for ministerial action in the context of extrajudicial collective redress. In order to achieve the abovementioned objectives, this work uses the hypothetical-deductive scientific method and a quantitative-quantitative approach, which will be made possible through the use of the following research techniques: (i) bibliographical, consisting of a review of specialized literature concerning the chosen themes; (ii) documental, consisting of a survey of secondary documents, including technical and quantitative reports of the CNMP and CNJ; and (iii) case study, consisting of the selection, description and analysis of a representative case of the Public Prosecutor's Office acting in the context of collective redress. The purpose of this methodology is to test and falsify the following hypothesis, which guides the studies undertaken here: in face of the re-signification of access to justice and the insufficiencies from which the judicial process suffers, it is imposed on the Public Prosecutor's Office a functional duty to stimulate consensuality for the resolution of conflicts, especially those that have as object transindividual rights, because, having at its disposal a broad and efficient toolbox aimed at this end, the Public Prosecutor's Office is responsible for acting resolutely, with priority in the extrajudicial path, in order to bypass the negative externalities of the justice crisis. Conclusively, the existence of this duty is verified and sustained, outlining its content, its compatibility with functional independence and its normative bases. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2023-05-26T17:19:56Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2023-03-22 |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2025-04-17 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
DUARTE, Matheus Prestes Tavares. Ministério Público resolutivo e acesso à justiça: fundamentos e instrumentos extrajudiciais de tutela de direitos transindividuais. 2023. 217 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Faculdade de Direito, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 2023. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/handle/1/19655 |
identifier_str_mv |
DUARTE, Matheus Prestes Tavares. Ministério Público resolutivo e acesso à justiça: fundamentos e instrumentos extrajudiciais de tutela de direitos transindividuais. 2023. 217 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Faculdade de Direito, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 2023. |
url |
http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/handle/1/19655 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
embargoedAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UERJ |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Ciências Sociais::Faculdade de Direito |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UERJ instname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) instacron:UERJ |
instname_str |
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) |
instacron_str |
UERJ |
institution |
UERJ |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UERJ |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UERJ |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/bitstream/1/19655/2/Disserta%C3%A7%C3%A3o+-+Matheus+Prestes+Tavares+Duarte+-+2023+-+Parcial.pdf http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/bitstream/1/19655/3/Disserta%C3%A7%C3%A3o+-+Matheus+Prestes+Tavares+Duarte+-+2023+-+Completa.pdf http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/bitstream/1/19655/1/license.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
28d165686258f281fbb943a15bf0064d dae1afdc95c7d62e450faf6d5305d344 e5502652da718045d7fcd832b79fca29 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UERJ - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bdtd.suporte@uerj.br |
_version_ |
1792352379586215936 |