The witness of the other sex: gender relations in the self-report in the History
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Canoa do Tempo (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.periodicos.ufam.edu.br/index.php/Canoa_do_Tempo/article/view/9903 |
Resumo: | The experience of “(re)resignification” is a debate among scholars dealing with sources and uses of self-reports. This article advances the existing debate to think about memory and “to tell”, the experience itself in the past and the (re)resignification in times of revisiting and methodological transition, when the new frontiers of the object are: the advances of the movements of empowered women from the conservative milieu of the hegemonic masculine; the stage of the 1964 coup narrated by the defeated, and the conceptual framework of colonial feminism. It is said: memory has sex; the memory sex is the socially dominant sex; the “recounting” of the feminine is amalgamated by the dominant discourse, and to think of gender is to think of the feminine's capacity to overcome dichotomies in themselves and in the narrative. Classic works of Memory and History are taken up; it is supported by C. Guillaumin, H. Saffioti, M. Rago, P. Tabet and María Lugones; The feminist episteme of Gender is confronted with binary thinking to conclude with the analysis of the interviewee's orality, Nida, as she likes to call herself. |
id |
UFAM-2_174b8d24b172b0f2dd25b41ece91e714 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/9903 |
network_acronym_str |
UFAM-2 |
network_name_str |
Canoa do Tempo (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The witness of the other sex: gender relations in the self-report in the HistoryA testemunha do outro sexo: relações de gênero no relato de si e na HistóriaGênero e DescolonialidadeMemória e HistóriaHistória das MulheresGender and DecolonialityMemory and HistoryWomen's HistoryThe experience of “(re)resignification” is a debate among scholars dealing with sources and uses of self-reports. This article advances the existing debate to think about memory and “to tell”, the experience itself in the past and the (re)resignification in times of revisiting and methodological transition, when the new frontiers of the object are: the advances of the movements of empowered women from the conservative milieu of the hegemonic masculine; the stage of the 1964 coup narrated by the defeated, and the conceptual framework of colonial feminism. It is said: memory has sex; the memory sex is the socially dominant sex; the “recounting” of the feminine is amalgamated by the dominant discourse, and to think of gender is to think of the feminine's capacity to overcome dichotomies in themselves and in the narrative. Classic works of Memory and History are taken up; it is supported by C. Guillaumin, H. Saffioti, M. Rago, P. Tabet and María Lugones; The feminist episteme of Gender is confronted with binary thinking to conclude with the analysis of the interviewee's orality, Nida, as she likes to call herself.A experiência da “(re)ressignificação” é debate entre estudiosos/as na lida com fontes e usos de relatos de si. Este artigo avança no debate existente para pensar a memória e o “se contar”, a experiência em si no passado e a (re)ressignificação em tempos de revisitação e transição metodológica, quando as novas fronteiras do objeto são: os avanços dos movimentos de mulheres empoderadas do meio conservador do masculino hegemônico; o palco do Golpe de 1964 narrado pelos vencidos, e o quadro conceitual do feminismo de(s)colonial. Afirma-se: a memória tem sexo; o sexo da memória é o sexo socialmente dominante; o “se contar” da feminina é amalgamado pelo discurso dominante, e pensar gênero é pensar a capacidade da feminina em superar as dicotomias em si e na narrativa. Retomam-se obras clássicas da Memória e da História; apoia-se em C. Guillaumin, H. Saffioti, M. Rago, P. Tabet e María Lugones; confrontam-se a episteme feminista de Gênero com o pensamento binário para se concluir com a análise da oralidade da entrevistada, Nida, como gosta de se chamar.Universidade Federal do Amazonas2022-12-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://www.periodicos.ufam.edu.br/index.php/Canoa_do_Tempo/article/view/990310.38047/rct.v14.FC.2022.dg8.p.1.17Canoa do Tempo; v. 14 (2022); 1-172594-81481982-075510.38047/rct.v14.FC.2022reponame:Canoa do Tempo (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM)instacron:UFAMporhttps://www.periodicos.ufam.edu.br/index.php/Canoa_do_Tempo/article/view/9903/8173Copyright (c) 2022 Canoa do TempoEsta obra está licenciada sob uma <a rel =" license "href =" http: / /creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ ">info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBandeira, Andréa2022-12-16T12:58:42Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/9903Revistahttps://www.periodicos.ufam.edu.br/index.php/Canoa_do_TempoPUBhttps://www.periodicos.ufam.edu.br/index.php/Canoa_do_Tempo/oaicanoadotempo@gmail.com||2594-81481982-0755opendoar:2022-12-16T12:58:42Canoa do Tempo (Online) - Universidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The witness of the other sex: gender relations in the self-report in the History A testemunha do outro sexo: relações de gênero no relato de si e na História |
title |
The witness of the other sex: gender relations in the self-report in the History |
spellingShingle |
The witness of the other sex: gender relations in the self-report in the History Bandeira, Andréa Gênero e Descolonialidade Memória e História História das Mulheres Gender and Decoloniality Memory and History Women's History |
title_short |
The witness of the other sex: gender relations in the self-report in the History |
title_full |
The witness of the other sex: gender relations in the self-report in the History |
title_fullStr |
The witness of the other sex: gender relations in the self-report in the History |
title_full_unstemmed |
The witness of the other sex: gender relations in the self-report in the History |
title_sort |
The witness of the other sex: gender relations in the self-report in the History |
author |
Bandeira, Andréa |
author_facet |
Bandeira, Andréa |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bandeira, Andréa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Gênero e Descolonialidade Memória e História História das Mulheres Gender and Decoloniality Memory and History Women's History |
topic |
Gênero e Descolonialidade Memória e História História das Mulheres Gender and Decoloniality Memory and History Women's History |
description |
The experience of “(re)resignification” is a debate among scholars dealing with sources and uses of self-reports. This article advances the existing debate to think about memory and “to tell”, the experience itself in the past and the (re)resignification in times of revisiting and methodological transition, when the new frontiers of the object are: the advances of the movements of empowered women from the conservative milieu of the hegemonic masculine; the stage of the 1964 coup narrated by the defeated, and the conceptual framework of colonial feminism. It is said: memory has sex; the memory sex is the socially dominant sex; the “recounting” of the feminine is amalgamated by the dominant discourse, and to think of gender is to think of the feminine's capacity to overcome dichotomies in themselves and in the narrative. Classic works of Memory and History are taken up; it is supported by C. Guillaumin, H. Saffioti, M. Rago, P. Tabet and María Lugones; The feminist episteme of Gender is confronted with binary thinking to conclude with the analysis of the interviewee's orality, Nida, as she likes to call herself. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-12-20 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.periodicos.ufam.edu.br/index.php/Canoa_do_Tempo/article/view/9903 10.38047/rct.v14.FC.2022.dg8.p.1.17 |
url |
https://www.periodicos.ufam.edu.br/index.php/Canoa_do_Tempo/article/view/9903 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.38047/rct.v14.FC.2022.dg8.p.1.17 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.periodicos.ufam.edu.br/index.php/Canoa_do_Tempo/article/view/9903/8173 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Canoa do Tempo info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Canoa do Tempo |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Amazonas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Amazonas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Canoa do Tempo; v. 14 (2022); 1-17 2594-8148 1982-0755 10.38047/rct.v14.FC.2022 reponame:Canoa do Tempo (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM) instacron:UFAM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM) |
instacron_str |
UFAM |
institution |
UFAM |
reponame_str |
Canoa do Tempo (Online) |
collection |
Canoa do Tempo (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Canoa do Tempo (Online) - Universidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
canoadotempo@gmail.com|| |
_version_ |
1797069128504180736 |