TELEOLOGY AND HISTORY

• Autor(a) principal: Santos Neto, Artur Bispo
• Data de Publicação: 2011
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Germinal: Marxismo e Educação em Debate
• Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistagerminal/article/view/9498
• topic: History philosophy; ontology; labor; causality; necessity.; Filosofia da história; ontologia; trabalho; causalidade; necessidade.; Filosofia da história; Ontologia; Trabalho; Causalidade; Necessidade.

Considering that the ratio and  empiricism fetishization leads to the development of an habitual tenderness to the supra-sensible things and the sensible things, the current paper has as starting point the critics to the notion of history that passes by the philosophy of history and as this ends up having repercussions in the inner of its own Marxism in a revisionist and dogmatic manner, to the proportion that it tries to confirm the existence of a mechanistic determination or of a necessary connexion in the development of the history. The predominance of the teleology, as fundamental category in the history fetishization for the idealist conception, expresses the hierarchical amalgam in the supervalorization of the logical in detriment of the ontological. During the reading of this text, it is affirmed that in the Marxian theory does not exist any possibility of teleology affirmation in society and in nature and that only in the labor, while criterion of social praxis, subsists a real dialectical relation between teleology and causality.