Agenda-setting policy: strategies and agenda denial mechanisms
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Organizações & Sociedade (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/13166 |
Resumo: | This paper focuses on an aspect overlooked in literature on policy formulation: agenda denial, the political process by which issues are kept from policymakers’ consideration and deliberation. The theoretical study of agenda-setting has been successful in pointing out the reasons why some issues achieve meaningful consideration by political institutions. However, there are several issues that fail to gain serious consideration for a variety of reasons, including specific tools and strategies that opponents employ in order to deny the access of an issue to the agenda. The power to keep an issue off the agenda is exercised through non- recognition or denial of the problem, discrediting the issue itself or the group directly related to it, the co-optation of leaders or the group’s symbols, postponement and formal denial, among other mechanisms. This study aims to explore these actions, seeking to contribute to research on public policy and further study on setting governmental agendas. |
id |
UFBA-4_50720ab6b2ac61e437325c0f50cc39df |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.ufba.br:article/13166 |
network_acronym_str |
UFBA-4 |
network_name_str |
Organizações & Sociedade (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Agenda-setting policy: strategies and agenda denial mechanismsPublic policyagenda-settingagenda denialpolicy formulation.This paper focuses on an aspect overlooked in literature on policy formulation: agenda denial, the political process by which issues are kept from policymakers’ consideration and deliberation. The theoretical study of agenda-setting has been successful in pointing out the reasons why some issues achieve meaningful consideration by political institutions. However, there are several issues that fail to gain serious consideration for a variety of reasons, including specific tools and strategies that opponents employ in order to deny the access of an issue to the agenda. The power to keep an issue off the agenda is exercised through non- recognition or denial of the problem, discrediting the issue itself or the group directly related to it, the co-optation of leaders or the group’s symbols, postponement and formal denial, among other mechanisms. This study aims to explore these actions, seeking to contribute to research on public policy and further study on setting governmental agendas.Núcleo de Pós-graduação em Administração, Escola de Administração, UFBA2016-09-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/13166Organizações & Sociedade; Vol. 23 No. 79 (2016)Organizações & Sociedade; v. 23 n. 79 (2016)1984-92301413-585Xreponame:Organizações & Sociedade (Online)instname:Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)instacron:UFBAporhttps://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/13166/11720Capella, Ana Claudia Niedhardtinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-01-17T17:29:21Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufba.br:article/13166Revistahttp://www.revistaoes.ufba.br/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcandidab@ufba.br||revistaoes@ufba.br1984-92301413-585Xopendoar:2020-01-17T17:29:21Organizações & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Agenda-setting policy: strategies and agenda denial mechanisms |
title |
Agenda-setting policy: strategies and agenda denial mechanisms |
spellingShingle |
Agenda-setting policy: strategies and agenda denial mechanisms Capella, Ana Claudia Niedhardt Public policy agenda-setting agenda denial policy formulation. |
title_short |
Agenda-setting policy: strategies and agenda denial mechanisms |
title_full |
Agenda-setting policy: strategies and agenda denial mechanisms |
title_fullStr |
Agenda-setting policy: strategies and agenda denial mechanisms |
title_full_unstemmed |
Agenda-setting policy: strategies and agenda denial mechanisms |
title_sort |
Agenda-setting policy: strategies and agenda denial mechanisms |
author |
Capella, Ana Claudia Niedhardt |
author_facet |
Capella, Ana Claudia Niedhardt |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Capella, Ana Claudia Niedhardt |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Public policy agenda-setting agenda denial policy formulation. |
topic |
Public policy agenda-setting agenda denial policy formulation. |
description |
This paper focuses on an aspect overlooked in literature on policy formulation: agenda denial, the political process by which issues are kept from policymakers’ consideration and deliberation. The theoretical study of agenda-setting has been successful in pointing out the reasons why some issues achieve meaningful consideration by political institutions. However, there are several issues that fail to gain serious consideration for a variety of reasons, including specific tools and strategies that opponents employ in order to deny the access of an issue to the agenda. The power to keep an issue off the agenda is exercised through non- recognition or denial of the problem, discrediting the issue itself or the group directly related to it, the co-optation of leaders or the group’s symbols, postponement and formal denial, among other mechanisms. This study aims to explore these actions, seeking to contribute to research on public policy and further study on setting governmental agendas. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-09-26 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/13166 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/13166 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/13166/11720 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Núcleo de Pós-graduação em Administração, Escola de Administração, UFBA |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Núcleo de Pós-graduação em Administração, Escola de Administração, UFBA |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Organizações & Sociedade; Vol. 23 No. 79 (2016) Organizações & Sociedade; v. 23 n. 79 (2016) 1984-9230 1413-585X reponame:Organizações & Sociedade (Online) instname:Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA) instacron:UFBA |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA) |
instacron_str |
UFBA |
institution |
UFBA |
reponame_str |
Organizações & Sociedade (Online) |
collection |
Organizações & Sociedade (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Organizações & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
candidab@ufba.br||revistaoes@ufba.br |
_version_ |
1799698970332626944 |