Phronesis, Moral Judgment, and Ethical Decision Making: Experiences of Public Managers in the Area of Emergency Management
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng por |
Título da fonte: | Organizações & Sociedade (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/44278 |
Resumo: | The purpose of this article is to investigate how phronesis manifests itself in moral judgment based on the experience of public managers in situations of ethical decisions in the area of emergency management (risk and disaster management). We conducted a literature review on phronesis as a virtue of “acting well.” As methodological procedures guided by a phenomenological epistemology and qualitative approach, an in-depth interview, non-participant observation, and document analysis were conducted. The discussion of data was organized into three sections: context and circumstances in the area of emergency management, experience and tacit knowledge of managers, and cognitive, affective, and reflexive composition of phronesis. Some elements of phronesis are perceptible and contribute to the ethical decision-making process in view of the possibilities of limiting moral judgment, such as the context and contingency circumstances of emergencies, the affective dimension such as empathy, the need for mediation between instrumental aspects and the will to act with compassion, counseling as a reflective element, and memory and learning from past experiences. The conclusion is that, when conditions for moral judgment are not favorable and/or there are limiting factors - such as excess of technical and/or bureaucratic issues, a context of insecurity, and a purpose of protecting human life -, phronesis may help to develop an enlightened knowledge for the individual exposed to reviews, education and clarification about the social, political, and organizational context to which she or he belongs. |
id |
UFBA-4_6200a2076cedc7cae98818286abb0d3b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.ufba.br:article/44278 |
network_acronym_str |
UFBA-4 |
network_name_str |
Organizações & Sociedade (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Phronesis, Moral Judgment, and Ethical Decision Making: Experiences of Public Managers in the Area of Emergency Management Phronesis, Julgamento Moral e Processo Decisório Ético: Vivências de Gestores Públicos da Área de Proteção e Defesa Civilphronesisprudênciasabedoria práticagestão públicaproteção e defesa civilphronesisprudencepractical wisdompublic managementemergency managementThe purpose of this article is to investigate how phronesis manifests itself in moral judgment based on the experience of public managers in situations of ethical decisions in the area of emergency management (risk and disaster management). We conducted a literature review on phronesis as a virtue of “acting well.” As methodological procedures guided by a phenomenological epistemology and qualitative approach, an in-depth interview, non-participant observation, and document analysis were conducted. The discussion of data was organized into three sections: context and circumstances in the area of emergency management, experience and tacit knowledge of managers, and cognitive, affective, and reflexive composition of phronesis. Some elements of phronesis are perceptible and contribute to the ethical decision-making process in view of the possibilities of limiting moral judgment, such as the context and contingency circumstances of emergencies, the affective dimension such as empathy, the need for mediation between instrumental aspects and the will to act with compassion, counseling as a reflective element, and memory and learning from past experiences. The conclusion is that, when conditions for moral judgment are not favorable and/or there are limiting factors - such as excess of technical and/or bureaucratic issues, a context of insecurity, and a purpose of protecting human life -, phronesis may help to develop an enlightened knowledge for the individual exposed to reviews, education and clarification about the social, political, and organizational context to which she or he belongs. O objetivo deste artigo é investigar de que maneira a phronesis se manifesta com o julgamento moral a partir da experiência de gestores públicos em situações de decisões éticas na área de proteção e defesa civil (gestão de riscos e desastres). Realizou-se um resgate na literatura sobre a temática da phronesis enquanto virtude do “bem agir”. Como procedimentos metodológicos, orientados por uma epistemologia fenomenológica e abordagem qualitativa, utilizou-se a entrevista em profundidade, observação não participante e análise documental. A discussão dos dados foi organizada em três seções: contexto e circunstâncias da área de proteção e defesa civil; experiência vivida e conhecimento tácito dos gestores; e composição cognitiva, afetiva e reflexiva da phronesis. Alguns elementos da phronesis foram perceptíveis e contribuíram para o processo decisório ético diante das possibilidades de limitação do julgamento moral, tais como: o contexto e as circunstâncias contingenciais de urgências; a dimensão afetiva, como a empatia; a necessidade de mediação entre aspectos instrumentais e a vontade de agir com compaixão; aconselhamento como elemento reflexivo; e memória e aprendizagem, a partir de experiências anteriores. Concluiu-se que, quando as condições para o julgamento moral não são favoráveis e/ou possuem fatores limitantes – como o excesso de questões técnicas e/ou burocráticas, o contexto de insegurança e a finalidade de proteger a vida humana –, a phronesis pode ajudar a desenvolver um saber esclarecido para o indivíduo, exposto à revisão, educação e esclarecimento sobre o contexto social, político e organizacional ao qual pertence. Núcleo de Pós-graduação em Administração, Escola de Administração, UFBA2022-05-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/44278Organizações & Sociedade; Vol. 29 No. 101 (2022)Organizações & Sociedade; v. 29 n. 101 (2022)1984-92301413-585Xreponame:Organizações & Sociedade (Online)instname:Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)instacron:UFBAengporhttps://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/44278/26796https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/44278/26797Copyright (c) 2022 Organizações & Sociedadeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Laís SilveiraSerafim, Mauricio C.2022-05-10T01:44:09Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufba.br:article/44278Revistahttp://www.revistaoes.ufba.br/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcandidab@ufba.br||revistaoes@ufba.br1984-92301413-585Xopendoar:2022-05-10T01:44:09Organizações & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Phronesis, Moral Judgment, and Ethical Decision Making: Experiences of Public Managers in the Area of Emergency Management Phronesis, Julgamento Moral e Processo Decisório Ético: Vivências de Gestores Públicos da Área de Proteção e Defesa Civil |
title |
Phronesis, Moral Judgment, and Ethical Decision Making: Experiences of Public Managers in the Area of Emergency Management |
spellingShingle |
Phronesis, Moral Judgment, and Ethical Decision Making: Experiences of Public Managers in the Area of Emergency Management Santos, Laís Silveira phronesis prudência sabedoria prática gestão pública proteção e defesa civil phronesis prudence practical wisdom public management emergency management |
title_short |
Phronesis, Moral Judgment, and Ethical Decision Making: Experiences of Public Managers in the Area of Emergency Management |
title_full |
Phronesis, Moral Judgment, and Ethical Decision Making: Experiences of Public Managers in the Area of Emergency Management |
title_fullStr |
Phronesis, Moral Judgment, and Ethical Decision Making: Experiences of Public Managers in the Area of Emergency Management |
title_full_unstemmed |
Phronesis, Moral Judgment, and Ethical Decision Making: Experiences of Public Managers in the Area of Emergency Management |
title_sort |
Phronesis, Moral Judgment, and Ethical Decision Making: Experiences of Public Managers in the Area of Emergency Management |
author |
Santos, Laís Silveira |
author_facet |
Santos, Laís Silveira Serafim, Mauricio C. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Serafim, Mauricio C. |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos, Laís Silveira Serafim, Mauricio C. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
phronesis prudência sabedoria prática gestão pública proteção e defesa civil phronesis prudence practical wisdom public management emergency management |
topic |
phronesis prudência sabedoria prática gestão pública proteção e defesa civil phronesis prudence practical wisdom public management emergency management |
description |
The purpose of this article is to investigate how phronesis manifests itself in moral judgment based on the experience of public managers in situations of ethical decisions in the area of emergency management (risk and disaster management). We conducted a literature review on phronesis as a virtue of “acting well.” As methodological procedures guided by a phenomenological epistemology and qualitative approach, an in-depth interview, non-participant observation, and document analysis were conducted. The discussion of data was organized into three sections: context and circumstances in the area of emergency management, experience and tacit knowledge of managers, and cognitive, affective, and reflexive composition of phronesis. Some elements of phronesis are perceptible and contribute to the ethical decision-making process in view of the possibilities of limiting moral judgment, such as the context and contingency circumstances of emergencies, the affective dimension such as empathy, the need for mediation between instrumental aspects and the will to act with compassion, counseling as a reflective element, and memory and learning from past experiences. The conclusion is that, when conditions for moral judgment are not favorable and/or there are limiting factors - such as excess of technical and/or bureaucratic issues, a context of insecurity, and a purpose of protecting human life -, phronesis may help to develop an enlightened knowledge for the individual exposed to reviews, education and clarification about the social, political, and organizational context to which she or he belongs. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-05-10 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/44278 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/44278 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng por |
language |
eng por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/44278/26796 https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/44278/26797 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Organizações & Sociedade info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Organizações & Sociedade |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Núcleo de Pós-graduação em Administração, Escola de Administração, UFBA |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Núcleo de Pós-graduação em Administração, Escola de Administração, UFBA |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Organizações & Sociedade; Vol. 29 No. 101 (2022) Organizações & Sociedade; v. 29 n. 101 (2022) 1984-9230 1413-585X reponame:Organizações & Sociedade (Online) instname:Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA) instacron:UFBA |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA) |
instacron_str |
UFBA |
institution |
UFBA |
reponame_str |
Organizações & Sociedade (Online) |
collection |
Organizações & Sociedade (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Organizações & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
candidab@ufba.br||revistaoes@ufba.br |
_version_ |
1799698971334017024 |