Politics and science in Hannah Arendt
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/42728 |
Resumo: | We differentiate and problematize two types of discourses of the current world from the thought of Hannah Arendt, the scientific and the political. We analyze within his work from the application of the method of bibliographical research the conflict between politics and science. As a result of the research we present the relations between politics and science in Arendt in three guiding axes: the first deals with the pathos of the elimination of discourse and action by the scientific theories inheriting from the crisis of the modern world in which, politically, the problem of reducing the value of action in the public space for the resolution of human conflicts, in which there is a decrease in the recognition of the importance of discourse and presence in the common world, affects the destiny of communities; the second axis deals with the modern indistinction – theoretical and practical – between action and process, that is, between politics and science; the third axis seeks to clarify what, in fact, for Arendt, is the activity of action, which makes man a political being. Thus, we present the solution of irreversibility and unpredictability of action from the Arendtian point of view in order to clarify that scientific discourse is procedural and linked to fabrication while action is the foundation of Arendtian theory of action. |
id |
UFC-17_9e820be591524b75fcab43f546bf1b99 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufc:article/42728 |
network_acronym_str |
UFC-17 |
network_name_str |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Politics and science in Hannah ArendtPolítica e ciência em Hannah Arendt Theory of action. Scientific theory. Process theory. Public space.Teoria da ação. Teoria científica. Teoria do processo. Espaço público.We differentiate and problematize two types of discourses of the current world from the thought of Hannah Arendt, the scientific and the political. We analyze within his work from the application of the method of bibliographical research the conflict between politics and science. As a result of the research we present the relations between politics and science in Arendt in three guiding axes: the first deals with the pathos of the elimination of discourse and action by the scientific theories inheriting from the crisis of the modern world in which, politically, the problem of reducing the value of action in the public space for the resolution of human conflicts, in which there is a decrease in the recognition of the importance of discourse and presence in the common world, affects the destiny of communities; the second axis deals with the modern indistinction – theoretical and practical – between action and process, that is, between politics and science; the third axis seeks to clarify what, in fact, for Arendt, is the activity of action, which makes man a political being. Thus, we present the solution of irreversibility and unpredictability of action from the Arendtian point of view in order to clarify that scientific discourse is procedural and linked to fabrication while action is the foundation of Arendtian theory of action.Diferenciamos e problematizamos dois tipos de discursos do mundo atual a partir do pensamento de Hannah Arendt, o científico e o político. Analisamos no interior de sua obra a partir da aplicação do método de pesquisa bibliográfica o conflito entre política e ciência. Como resultado da pesquisa apresentamos as relações entre política e ciência em Arendt em três eixos norteadores: o primeiro trata do páthos da eliminação do discurso e da ação pelas teorias científicas herdeiras da crise do mundo moderno em que politicamente, o problema da redução do valor da ação no espaço público para a solução dos conflitos humanos, em que há uma diminuição no reconhecimento da importância do discurso e da presença no mundo comum, afeta o destino das comunidades; o segundo eixo trata da indistinção moderna – teórica e prática – entre ação e processo, ou seja, entre política e ciência; o terceiro eixo trata de esclarecer o que, de fato, para Arendt, é a atividade da ação, que faz do homem um ser político. Dessa forma, apresentamos a solução da irreversibilidade e da imprevisibilidade da ação no ponto de vista arendtiano a fim de esclarecer que o discurso científico é processual e ligado à fabricação enquanto que a ação é o fundamento da teoria da ação arendtiana.Universidade Federal do Ceará2020-04-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articleapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/4272810.36517/Argumentos.23.6Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 23 (2020); 74-86Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 23 (2020); 74-86Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 23 (2020); 74-861984-42551984-4247reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCporhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/42728/100319Copyright (c) 2020 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBriskievicz , Danilo Arnaldo 2021-07-22T14:08:39Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/42728Revistahttp://www.filosofia.ufc.br/argumentosPUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/oaiargumentos@ufc.br||1984-42551984-4247opendoar:2021-07-22T14:08:39Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Politics and science in Hannah Arendt Política e ciência em Hannah Arendt |
title |
Politics and science in Hannah Arendt |
spellingShingle |
Politics and science in Hannah Arendt Briskievicz , Danilo Arnaldo Theory of action. Scientific theory. Process theory. Public space. Teoria da ação. Teoria científica. Teoria do processo. Espaço público. |
title_short |
Politics and science in Hannah Arendt |
title_full |
Politics and science in Hannah Arendt |
title_fullStr |
Politics and science in Hannah Arendt |
title_full_unstemmed |
Politics and science in Hannah Arendt |
title_sort |
Politics and science in Hannah Arendt |
author |
Briskievicz , Danilo Arnaldo |
author_facet |
Briskievicz , Danilo Arnaldo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Briskievicz , Danilo Arnaldo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Theory of action. Scientific theory. Process theory. Public space. Teoria da ação. Teoria científica. Teoria do processo. Espaço público. |
topic |
Theory of action. Scientific theory. Process theory. Public space. Teoria da ação. Teoria científica. Teoria do processo. Espaço público. |
description |
We differentiate and problematize two types of discourses of the current world from the thought of Hannah Arendt, the scientific and the political. We analyze within his work from the application of the method of bibliographical research the conflict between politics and science. As a result of the research we present the relations between politics and science in Arendt in three guiding axes: the first deals with the pathos of the elimination of discourse and action by the scientific theories inheriting from the crisis of the modern world in which, politically, the problem of reducing the value of action in the public space for the resolution of human conflicts, in which there is a decrease in the recognition of the importance of discourse and presence in the common world, affects the destiny of communities; the second axis deals with the modern indistinction – theoretical and practical – between action and process, that is, between politics and science; the third axis seeks to clarify what, in fact, for Arendt, is the activity of action, which makes man a political being. Thus, we present the solution of irreversibility and unpredictability of action from the Arendtian point of view in order to clarify that scientific discourse is procedural and linked to fabrication while action is the foundation of Arendtian theory of action. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-04-19 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/42728 10.36517/Argumentos.23.6 |
url |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/42728 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.36517/Argumentos.23.6 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/42728/100319 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 23 (2020); 74-86 Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 23 (2020); 74-86 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 23 (2020); 74-86 1984-4255 1984-4247 reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) instacron:UFC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
instacron_str |
UFC |
institution |
UFC |
reponame_str |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
collection |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
argumentos@ufc.br|| |
_version_ |
1797068846920630272 |