Politics and science in Hannah Arendt

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Briskievicz , Danilo Arnaldo
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/42728
Resumo: We differentiate and problematize two types of discourses of the current world from the thought of Hannah Arendt, the scientific and the political. We analyze within his work from the application of the method of bibliographical research the conflict between politics and science. As a result of the research we present the relations between politics and science in Arendt in three guiding axes: the first deals with the pathos of the elimination of discourse and action by the scientific theories inheriting from the crisis of the modern world in which, politically, the problem of reducing the value of action in the public space for the resolution of human conflicts, in which there is a decrease in the recognition of the importance of discourse and presence in the common world, affects the destiny of communities; the second axis deals with the modern indistinction – theoretical and practical – between action and process, that is, between politics and science; the third axis seeks to clarify what, in fact, for Arendt, is the activity of action, which makes man a political being. Thus, we present the solution of irreversibility and unpredictability of action from the Arendtian point of view in order to clarify that scientific discourse is procedural and linked to fabrication while action is the foundation of Arendtian theory of action.
id UFC-17_9e820be591524b75fcab43f546bf1b99
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufc:article/42728
network_acronym_str UFC-17
network_name_str Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Politics and science in Hannah ArendtPolítica e ciência em Hannah Arendt Theory of action. Scientific theory. Process theory. Public space.Teoria da ação. Teoria científica. Teoria do processo. Espaço público.We differentiate and problematize two types of discourses of the current world from the thought of Hannah Arendt, the scientific and the political. We analyze within his work from the application of the method of bibliographical research the conflict between politics and science. As a result of the research we present the relations between politics and science in Arendt in three guiding axes: the first deals with the pathos of the elimination of discourse and action by the scientific theories inheriting from the crisis of the modern world in which, politically, the problem of reducing the value of action in the public space for the resolution of human conflicts, in which there is a decrease in the recognition of the importance of discourse and presence in the common world, affects the destiny of communities; the second axis deals with the modern indistinction – theoretical and practical – between action and process, that is, between politics and science; the third axis seeks to clarify what, in fact, for Arendt, is the activity of action, which makes man a political being. Thus, we present the solution of irreversibility and unpredictability of action from the Arendtian point of view in order to clarify that scientific discourse is procedural and linked to fabrication while action is the foundation of Arendtian theory of action.Diferenciamos e problematizamos dois tipos de discursos do mundo atual a partir do pensamento de Hannah Arendt, o científico e o político. Analisamos no interior de sua obra a partir da aplicação do método de pesquisa bibliográfica o conflito entre política e ciência. Como resultado da pesquisa apresentamos as relações entre política e ciência em Arendt em três eixos norteadores: o primeiro trata do páthos da eliminação do discurso e da ação pelas teorias científicas herdeiras da crise do mundo moderno em que politicamente, o problema da redução do valor da ação no espaço público para a solução dos conflitos humanos, em que há uma diminuição no reconhecimento da importância do discurso e da presença no mundo comum, afeta o destino das comunidades; o segundo eixo trata da indistinção moderna – teórica e prática – entre ação e processo, ou seja, entre política e ciência; o terceiro eixo trata de esclarecer o que, de fato, para Arendt, é a atividade da ação, que faz do homem um ser político. Dessa forma, apresentamos a solução da irreversibilidade e da imprevisibilidade da ação no ponto de vista arendtiano a fim de esclarecer que o discurso científico é processual e ligado à fabricação enquanto que a ação é o fundamento da teoria da ação arendtiana.Universidade Federal do Ceará2020-04-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articleapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/4272810.36517/Argumentos.23.6Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 23 (2020); 74-86Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 23 (2020); 74-86Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 23 (2020); 74-861984-42551984-4247reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCporhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/42728/100319Copyright (c) 2020 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBriskievicz , Danilo Arnaldo 2021-07-22T14:08:39Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/42728Revistahttp://www.filosofia.ufc.br/argumentosPUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/oaiargumentos@ufc.br||1984-42551984-4247opendoar:2021-07-22T14:08:39Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Politics and science in Hannah Arendt
Política e ciência em Hannah Arendt
title Politics and science in Hannah Arendt
spellingShingle Politics and science in Hannah Arendt
Briskievicz , Danilo Arnaldo
Theory of action. Scientific theory. Process theory. Public space.
Teoria da ação. Teoria científica. Teoria do processo. Espaço público.
title_short Politics and science in Hannah Arendt
title_full Politics and science in Hannah Arendt
title_fullStr Politics and science in Hannah Arendt
title_full_unstemmed Politics and science in Hannah Arendt
title_sort Politics and science in Hannah Arendt
author Briskievicz , Danilo Arnaldo
author_facet Briskievicz , Danilo Arnaldo
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Briskievicz , Danilo Arnaldo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Theory of action. Scientific theory. Process theory. Public space.
Teoria da ação. Teoria científica. Teoria do processo. Espaço público.
topic Theory of action. Scientific theory. Process theory. Public space.
Teoria da ação. Teoria científica. Teoria do processo. Espaço público.
description We differentiate and problematize two types of discourses of the current world from the thought of Hannah Arendt, the scientific and the political. We analyze within his work from the application of the method of bibliographical research the conflict between politics and science. As a result of the research we present the relations between politics and science in Arendt in three guiding axes: the first deals with the pathos of the elimination of discourse and action by the scientific theories inheriting from the crisis of the modern world in which, politically, the problem of reducing the value of action in the public space for the resolution of human conflicts, in which there is a decrease in the recognition of the importance of discourse and presence in the common world, affects the destiny of communities; the second axis deals with the modern indistinction – theoretical and practical – between action and process, that is, between politics and science; the third axis seeks to clarify what, in fact, for Arendt, is the activity of action, which makes man a political being. Thus, we present the solution of irreversibility and unpredictability of action from the Arendtian point of view in order to clarify that scientific discourse is procedural and linked to fabrication while action is the foundation of Arendtian theory of action.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-04-19
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/42728
10.36517/Argumentos.23.6
url http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/42728
identifier_str_mv 10.36517/Argumentos.23.6
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/42728/100319
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 23 (2020); 74-86
Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 23 (2020); 74-86
Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 23 (2020); 74-86
1984-4255
1984-4247
reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
collection Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv argumentos@ufc.br||
_version_ 1797068846920630272