Ways of thinking: methodological contributions to the brazilian philosophy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Marques, Lúcio Álvaro
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/61497
Resumo: Why there wouldn’t be a Brazilian philosophy? Here is the question that has motivated us for a long time and led us to the identification of some paradigms below. As we have meditated about it, we have glimpsed new scenarios and perspectives that are possible in the elaboration of some answer to it. At this moment, we don’t offer an answer. We only list possible paradigms that are understanding about the originality of a Brazilian philosophy, as follows, a characterizing of postures: affirmative, negative, historiographical, literary and philosophical, university philosophy, primitive knowledge, libertarian praxis, philosophies of foreign ways of thinking, interpreters of Brazil, metaphilosophy and philosophy of the ways of thinking. This characterizing is not found in most authors that were mentioned, but we formulated it as a pre-understanding of a broader work that we are developing around the Brazilian philosophical methodologies and, partly, also Latin American, whose focus will be to respond the initial question. Two precedent proposals were present at the IESMA and UFOP. Our task is to investigate the cohe-rence and utility of these paradigms as a pretext to the question: what is Brazilian philosophy?
id UFC-17_b2cce463035577d54dab8fabebe3d1de
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufc:article/61497
network_acronym_str UFC-17
network_name_str Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Ways of thinking: methodological contributions to the brazilian philosophyFormas do pensar: aportes metodológicos à filosofia brasileiraBrazilian philosophy. Originality. Methodologies. Ways of thinking.Filosofia brasileira. Originalidade. Metodologias. Formas de pensamento.Why there wouldn’t be a Brazilian philosophy? Here is the question that has motivated us for a long time and led us to the identification of some paradigms below. As we have meditated about it, we have glimpsed new scenarios and perspectives that are possible in the elaboration of some answer to it. At this moment, we don’t offer an answer. We only list possible paradigms that are understanding about the originality of a Brazilian philosophy, as follows, a characterizing of postures: affirmative, negative, historiographical, literary and philosophical, university philosophy, primitive knowledge, libertarian praxis, philosophies of foreign ways of thinking, interpreters of Brazil, metaphilosophy and philosophy of the ways of thinking. This characterizing is not found in most authors that were mentioned, but we formulated it as a pre-understanding of a broader work that we are developing around the Brazilian philosophical methodologies and, partly, also Latin American, whose focus will be to respond the initial question. Two precedent proposals were present at the IESMA and UFOP. Our task is to investigate the cohe-rence and utility of these paradigms as a pretext to the question: what is Brazilian philosophy?Por que não haveria uma filosofia brasileira? Eis a questão que nos move há tempos e que nos levou à identificação de alguns dos paradigmas abaixo. À medida que meditamos sobre ela, entrevimos novos cenários e perspectivas possíveis à elaboração de alguma resposta para a mesma. Neste momento, não oferecemos uma resposta, apenas elencamos possíveis paradigmas compreensivos acerca da originalidade de uma filosofia brasileira, a saber, uma caracterização das posturas: afirmativa, negativa, historiográfica, literário-filosófica, filosofia universitária, sabedoria primitiva, práxis-libertadora, filosofias das visões de mundo estrangeira, intérpretes do Brasil, metafilosofia, e filosofia das formas de pensamento. Essa caracterização não se encontra em muitos dos autores citados, mas a formulamos tão só como uma pré-compreensão de um trabalho mais amplo que estamos desenvolvendo em torno das metodologias filosóficas brasileiras e, em parte também, latino-americanas, cujo foco será responder à questão inicial. Dois esboços precedentes foram apresentados no IESMA e na UFOP. Cumpre-nos averiguar a coerência e a utilidade desses paradigmas como pretexto à questão “o que é filosofia brasileira”?Universidade Federal do Ceará2020-12-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articleapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/6149710.36517/Argumentos.25.7Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 25 (2021): Dossiê Filosofia do Brasil; 134-147Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 25 (2021): Dossiê Filosofia do Brasil; 134-147Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 25 (2021): Dossiê Filosofia do Brasil; 134-1471984-42551984-4247reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCporhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/61497/162493Copyright (c) 2020 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMarques, Lúcio Álvaro2021-07-22T13:12:01Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/61497Revistahttp://www.filosofia.ufc.br/argumentosPUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/oaiargumentos@ufc.br||1984-42551984-4247opendoar:2021-07-22T13:12:01Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Ways of thinking: methodological contributions to the brazilian philosophy
Formas do pensar: aportes metodológicos à filosofia brasileira
title Ways of thinking: methodological contributions to the brazilian philosophy
spellingShingle Ways of thinking: methodological contributions to the brazilian philosophy
Marques, Lúcio Álvaro
Brazilian philosophy. Originality. Methodologies. Ways of thinking.
Filosofia brasileira. Originalidade. Metodologias. Formas de pensamento.
title_short Ways of thinking: methodological contributions to the brazilian philosophy
title_full Ways of thinking: methodological contributions to the brazilian philosophy
title_fullStr Ways of thinking: methodological contributions to the brazilian philosophy
title_full_unstemmed Ways of thinking: methodological contributions to the brazilian philosophy
title_sort Ways of thinking: methodological contributions to the brazilian philosophy
author Marques, Lúcio Álvaro
author_facet Marques, Lúcio Álvaro
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Marques, Lúcio Álvaro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Brazilian philosophy. Originality. Methodologies. Ways of thinking.
Filosofia brasileira. Originalidade. Metodologias. Formas de pensamento.
topic Brazilian philosophy. Originality. Methodologies. Ways of thinking.
Filosofia brasileira. Originalidade. Metodologias. Formas de pensamento.
description Why there wouldn’t be a Brazilian philosophy? Here is the question that has motivated us for a long time and led us to the identification of some paradigms below. As we have meditated about it, we have glimpsed new scenarios and perspectives that are possible in the elaboration of some answer to it. At this moment, we don’t offer an answer. We only list possible paradigms that are understanding about the originality of a Brazilian philosophy, as follows, a characterizing of postures: affirmative, negative, historiographical, literary and philosophical, university philosophy, primitive knowledge, libertarian praxis, philosophies of foreign ways of thinking, interpreters of Brazil, metaphilosophy and philosophy of the ways of thinking. This characterizing is not found in most authors that were mentioned, but we formulated it as a pre-understanding of a broader work that we are developing around the Brazilian philosophical methodologies and, partly, also Latin American, whose focus will be to respond the initial question. Two precedent proposals were present at the IESMA and UFOP. Our task is to investigate the cohe-rence and utility of these paradigms as a pretext to the question: what is Brazilian philosophy?
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/61497
10.36517/Argumentos.25.7
url http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/61497
identifier_str_mv 10.36517/Argumentos.25.7
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/61497/162493
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 25 (2021): Dossiê Filosofia do Brasil; 134-147
Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 25 (2021): Dossiê Filosofia do Brasil; 134-147
Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 25 (2021): Dossiê Filosofia do Brasil; 134-147
1984-4255
1984-4247
reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
collection Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv argumentos@ufc.br||
_version_ 1797068847251980288