Ways of thinking: methodological contributions to the brazilian philosophy
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/61497 |
Resumo: | Why there wouldn’t be a Brazilian philosophy? Here is the question that has motivated us for a long time and led us to the identification of some paradigms below. As we have meditated about it, we have glimpsed new scenarios and perspectives that are possible in the elaboration of some answer to it. At this moment, we don’t offer an answer. We only list possible paradigms that are understanding about the originality of a Brazilian philosophy, as follows, a characterizing of postures: affirmative, negative, historiographical, literary and philosophical, university philosophy, primitive knowledge, libertarian praxis, philosophies of foreign ways of thinking, interpreters of Brazil, metaphilosophy and philosophy of the ways of thinking. This characterizing is not found in most authors that were mentioned, but we formulated it as a pre-understanding of a broader work that we are developing around the Brazilian philosophical methodologies and, partly, also Latin American, whose focus will be to respond the initial question. Two precedent proposals were present at the IESMA and UFOP. Our task is to investigate the cohe-rence and utility of these paradigms as a pretext to the question: what is Brazilian philosophy? |
id |
UFC-17_b2cce463035577d54dab8fabebe3d1de |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufc:article/61497 |
network_acronym_str |
UFC-17 |
network_name_str |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Ways of thinking: methodological contributions to the brazilian philosophyFormas do pensar: aportes metodológicos à filosofia brasileiraBrazilian philosophy. Originality. Methodologies. Ways of thinking.Filosofia brasileira. Originalidade. Metodologias. Formas de pensamento.Why there wouldn’t be a Brazilian philosophy? Here is the question that has motivated us for a long time and led us to the identification of some paradigms below. As we have meditated about it, we have glimpsed new scenarios and perspectives that are possible in the elaboration of some answer to it. At this moment, we don’t offer an answer. We only list possible paradigms that are understanding about the originality of a Brazilian philosophy, as follows, a characterizing of postures: affirmative, negative, historiographical, literary and philosophical, university philosophy, primitive knowledge, libertarian praxis, philosophies of foreign ways of thinking, interpreters of Brazil, metaphilosophy and philosophy of the ways of thinking. This characterizing is not found in most authors that were mentioned, but we formulated it as a pre-understanding of a broader work that we are developing around the Brazilian philosophical methodologies and, partly, also Latin American, whose focus will be to respond the initial question. Two precedent proposals were present at the IESMA and UFOP. Our task is to investigate the cohe-rence and utility of these paradigms as a pretext to the question: what is Brazilian philosophy?Por que não haveria uma filosofia brasileira? Eis a questão que nos move há tempos e que nos levou à identificação de alguns dos paradigmas abaixo. À medida que meditamos sobre ela, entrevimos novos cenários e perspectivas possíveis à elaboração de alguma resposta para a mesma. Neste momento, não oferecemos uma resposta, apenas elencamos possíveis paradigmas compreensivos acerca da originalidade de uma filosofia brasileira, a saber, uma caracterização das posturas: afirmativa, negativa, historiográfica, literário-filosófica, filosofia universitária, sabedoria primitiva, práxis-libertadora, filosofias das visões de mundo estrangeira, intérpretes do Brasil, metafilosofia, e filosofia das formas de pensamento. Essa caracterização não se encontra em muitos dos autores citados, mas a formulamos tão só como uma pré-compreensão de um trabalho mais amplo que estamos desenvolvendo em torno das metodologias filosóficas brasileiras e, em parte também, latino-americanas, cujo foco será responder à questão inicial. Dois esboços precedentes foram apresentados no IESMA e na UFOP. Cumpre-nos averiguar a coerência e a utilidade desses paradigmas como pretexto à questão “o que é filosofia brasileira”?Universidade Federal do Ceará2020-12-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articleapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/6149710.36517/Argumentos.25.7Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 25 (2021): Dossiê Filosofia do Brasil; 134-147Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 25 (2021): Dossiê Filosofia do Brasil; 134-147Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 25 (2021): Dossiê Filosofia do Brasil; 134-1471984-42551984-4247reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCporhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/61497/162493Copyright (c) 2020 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMarques, Lúcio Álvaro2021-07-22T13:12:01Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/61497Revistahttp://www.filosofia.ufc.br/argumentosPUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/oaiargumentos@ufc.br||1984-42551984-4247opendoar:2021-07-22T13:12:01Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Ways of thinking: methodological contributions to the brazilian philosophy Formas do pensar: aportes metodológicos à filosofia brasileira |
title |
Ways of thinking: methodological contributions to the brazilian philosophy |
spellingShingle |
Ways of thinking: methodological contributions to the brazilian philosophy Marques, Lúcio Álvaro Brazilian philosophy. Originality. Methodologies. Ways of thinking. Filosofia brasileira. Originalidade. Metodologias. Formas de pensamento. |
title_short |
Ways of thinking: methodological contributions to the brazilian philosophy |
title_full |
Ways of thinking: methodological contributions to the brazilian philosophy |
title_fullStr |
Ways of thinking: methodological contributions to the brazilian philosophy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ways of thinking: methodological contributions to the brazilian philosophy |
title_sort |
Ways of thinking: methodological contributions to the brazilian philosophy |
author |
Marques, Lúcio Álvaro |
author_facet |
Marques, Lúcio Álvaro |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Marques, Lúcio Álvaro |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian philosophy. Originality. Methodologies. Ways of thinking. Filosofia brasileira. Originalidade. Metodologias. Formas de pensamento. |
topic |
Brazilian philosophy. Originality. Methodologies. Ways of thinking. Filosofia brasileira. Originalidade. Metodologias. Formas de pensamento. |
description |
Why there wouldn’t be a Brazilian philosophy? Here is the question that has motivated us for a long time and led us to the identification of some paradigms below. As we have meditated about it, we have glimpsed new scenarios and perspectives that are possible in the elaboration of some answer to it. At this moment, we don’t offer an answer. We only list possible paradigms that are understanding about the originality of a Brazilian philosophy, as follows, a characterizing of postures: affirmative, negative, historiographical, literary and philosophical, university philosophy, primitive knowledge, libertarian praxis, philosophies of foreign ways of thinking, interpreters of Brazil, metaphilosophy and philosophy of the ways of thinking. This characterizing is not found in most authors that were mentioned, but we formulated it as a pre-understanding of a broader work that we are developing around the Brazilian philosophical methodologies and, partly, also Latin American, whose focus will be to respond the initial question. Two precedent proposals were present at the IESMA and UFOP. Our task is to investigate the cohe-rence and utility of these paradigms as a pretext to the question: what is Brazilian philosophy? |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-11 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/61497 10.36517/Argumentos.25.7 |
url |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/61497 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.36517/Argumentos.25.7 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/61497/162493 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 25 (2021): Dossiê Filosofia do Brasil; 134-147 Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 25 (2021): Dossiê Filosofia do Brasil; 134-147 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 25 (2021): Dossiê Filosofia do Brasil; 134-147 1984-4255 1984-4247 reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) instacron:UFC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
instacron_str |
UFC |
institution |
UFC |
reponame_str |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
collection |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
argumentos@ufc.br|| |
_version_ |
1797068847251980288 |