A philosophical approach about judger convictions in the decision-making process

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Filho, Enoque Feitosa Sobreira
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/32022
Resumo: The object and research problem of this essay is to examine the crisis and the heuristic limits of the conceptual mainstream that tries to circumscribe its understanding of law as a thing that depends only on the legislator, confusing the necessary, if not sufficient, aspect of production of the rule legislated with that other activity, of application and concretization by the public agent that decides in the judicial scope. The question is: why the decision-making and normative process repeatedly underestimated in our jurisprudence (here understanding as theory of law) in terms of legal activity? Our research hypothesis is that although the question demands theoretical efforts from other spheres of the theory of law, none of their practical fields need them to clarify it, since it is self-evident and a realistic examination of the activity decision-making. As for the method, this is a bibliographical research. The theoretical reference is that of legal realism as important general theory and philosophy of law.
id UFC-17_ea49a232e758d7843e68f67d1e1e3a35
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufc:article/32022
network_acronym_str UFC-17
network_name_str Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling A philosophical approach about judger convictions in the decision-making processUma abordagem filosófica no papel das convicções do julgador no processo de tomada de decisãoTheory and philosophy of law. Normative implementation. Legal realism.Teoria da decisão. Concretização normativa. Direito e realismo.The object and research problem of this essay is to examine the crisis and the heuristic limits of the conceptual mainstream that tries to circumscribe its understanding of law as a thing that depends only on the legislator, confusing the necessary, if not sufficient, aspect of production of the rule legislated with that other activity, of application and concretization by the public agent that decides in the judicial scope. The question is: why the decision-making and normative process repeatedly underestimated in our jurisprudence (here understanding as theory of law) in terms of legal activity? Our research hypothesis is that although the question demands theoretical efforts from other spheres of the theory of law, none of their practical fields need them to clarify it, since it is self-evident and a realistic examination of the activity decision-making. As for the method, this is a bibliographical research. The theoretical reference is that of legal realism as important general theory and philosophy of law. O objeto e problema de pesquisa do presente ensaio é examinar a crise e os limites heurísticos da matriz que, no que concerne ao direito, tenta circunscrever sua compreensão a uma atividade dependente unicamente do legislador, confundindo o aspecto necessário, ainda que não suficiente, da produção da regra legislada com aquela outra atividade, de aplicação e concretização pelo agente público que decide no âmbito judicial. Trata-se, pois, de responder a questão: por que o processo de decisão e de concretização normativa é reiteradamente subestimado em nossa doutrina, em termos de atividade jurídica? Nossa hipótese de pesquisa é que embora a questão demande esforços teóricos de outras esferas da teoria do direito, nenhum de seus campos práticos deles necessitam para esclarecê-la, visto que ela é evidente de per si e, para tanto basta um exame realista da atividade de decisão. Quanto ao método, trata-se de pesquisa bibliográfica. O referencial teórico é aquele do realismo jurídico. Universidade Federal do Ceará2018-04-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/32022Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 19Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 19Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 191984-42551984-4247reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCporhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/32022/72333Copyright (c) 2018 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFilho, Enoque Feitosa Sobreira2021-07-23T00:01:01Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/32022Revistahttp://www.filosofia.ufc.br/argumentosPUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/oaiargumentos@ufc.br||1984-42551984-4247opendoar:2021-07-23T00:01:01Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A philosophical approach about judger convictions in the decision-making process
Uma abordagem filosófica no papel das convicções do julgador no processo de tomada de decisão
title A philosophical approach about judger convictions in the decision-making process
spellingShingle A philosophical approach about judger convictions in the decision-making process
Filho, Enoque Feitosa Sobreira
Theory and philosophy of law. Normative implementation. Legal realism.
Teoria da decisão. Concretização normativa. Direito e realismo.
title_short A philosophical approach about judger convictions in the decision-making process
title_full A philosophical approach about judger convictions in the decision-making process
title_fullStr A philosophical approach about judger convictions in the decision-making process
title_full_unstemmed A philosophical approach about judger convictions in the decision-making process
title_sort A philosophical approach about judger convictions in the decision-making process
author Filho, Enoque Feitosa Sobreira
author_facet Filho, Enoque Feitosa Sobreira
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Filho, Enoque Feitosa Sobreira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Theory and philosophy of law. Normative implementation. Legal realism.
Teoria da decisão. Concretização normativa. Direito e realismo.
topic Theory and philosophy of law. Normative implementation. Legal realism.
Teoria da decisão. Concretização normativa. Direito e realismo.
description The object and research problem of this essay is to examine the crisis and the heuristic limits of the conceptual mainstream that tries to circumscribe its understanding of law as a thing that depends only on the legislator, confusing the necessary, if not sufficient, aspect of production of the rule legislated with that other activity, of application and concretization by the public agent that decides in the judicial scope. The question is: why the decision-making and normative process repeatedly underestimated in our jurisprudence (here understanding as theory of law) in terms of legal activity? Our research hypothesis is that although the question demands theoretical efforts from other spheres of the theory of law, none of their practical fields need them to clarify it, since it is self-evident and a realistic examination of the activity decision-making. As for the method, this is a bibliographical research. The theoretical reference is that of legal realism as important general theory and philosophy of law.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-04-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/32022
url http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/32022
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/32022/72333
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 19
Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 19
Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 19
1984-4255
1984-4247
reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
collection Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv argumentos@ufc.br||
_version_ 1797068846457159680