A philosophical approach about judger convictions in the decision-making process
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/32022 |
Resumo: | The object and research problem of this essay is to examine the crisis and the heuristic limits of the conceptual mainstream that tries to circumscribe its understanding of law as a thing that depends only on the legislator, confusing the necessary, if not sufficient, aspect of production of the rule legislated with that other activity, of application and concretization by the public agent that decides in the judicial scope. The question is: why the decision-making and normative process repeatedly underestimated in our jurisprudence (here understanding as theory of law) in terms of legal activity? Our research hypothesis is that although the question demands theoretical efforts from other spheres of the theory of law, none of their practical fields need them to clarify it, since it is self-evident and a realistic examination of the activity decision-making. As for the method, this is a bibliographical research. The theoretical reference is that of legal realism as important general theory and philosophy of law. |
id |
UFC-17_ea49a232e758d7843e68f67d1e1e3a35 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufc:article/32022 |
network_acronym_str |
UFC-17 |
network_name_str |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
A philosophical approach about judger convictions in the decision-making processUma abordagem filosófica no papel das convicções do julgador no processo de tomada de decisãoTheory and philosophy of law. Normative implementation. Legal realism.Teoria da decisão. Concretização normativa. Direito e realismo.The object and research problem of this essay is to examine the crisis and the heuristic limits of the conceptual mainstream that tries to circumscribe its understanding of law as a thing that depends only on the legislator, confusing the necessary, if not sufficient, aspect of production of the rule legislated with that other activity, of application and concretization by the public agent that decides in the judicial scope. The question is: why the decision-making and normative process repeatedly underestimated in our jurisprudence (here understanding as theory of law) in terms of legal activity? Our research hypothesis is that although the question demands theoretical efforts from other spheres of the theory of law, none of their practical fields need them to clarify it, since it is self-evident and a realistic examination of the activity decision-making. As for the method, this is a bibliographical research. The theoretical reference is that of legal realism as important general theory and philosophy of law. O objeto e problema de pesquisa do presente ensaio é examinar a crise e os limites heurísticos da matriz que, no que concerne ao direito, tenta circunscrever sua compreensão a uma atividade dependente unicamente do legislador, confundindo o aspecto necessário, ainda que não suficiente, da produção da regra legislada com aquela outra atividade, de aplicação e concretização pelo agente público que decide no âmbito judicial. Trata-se, pois, de responder a questão: por que o processo de decisão e de concretização normativa é reiteradamente subestimado em nossa doutrina, em termos de atividade jurídica? Nossa hipótese de pesquisa é que embora a questão demande esforços teóricos de outras esferas da teoria do direito, nenhum de seus campos práticos deles necessitam para esclarecê-la, visto que ela é evidente de per si e, para tanto basta um exame realista da atividade de decisão. Quanto ao método, trata-se de pesquisa bibliográfica. O referencial teórico é aquele do realismo jurídico. Universidade Federal do Ceará2018-04-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/32022Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 19Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 19Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 191984-42551984-4247reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCporhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/32022/72333Copyright (c) 2018 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFilho, Enoque Feitosa Sobreira2021-07-23T00:01:01Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/32022Revistahttp://www.filosofia.ufc.br/argumentosPUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/oaiargumentos@ufc.br||1984-42551984-4247opendoar:2021-07-23T00:01:01Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A philosophical approach about judger convictions in the decision-making process Uma abordagem filosófica no papel das convicções do julgador no processo de tomada de decisão |
title |
A philosophical approach about judger convictions in the decision-making process |
spellingShingle |
A philosophical approach about judger convictions in the decision-making process Filho, Enoque Feitosa Sobreira Theory and philosophy of law. Normative implementation. Legal realism. Teoria da decisão. Concretização normativa. Direito e realismo. |
title_short |
A philosophical approach about judger convictions in the decision-making process |
title_full |
A philosophical approach about judger convictions in the decision-making process |
title_fullStr |
A philosophical approach about judger convictions in the decision-making process |
title_full_unstemmed |
A philosophical approach about judger convictions in the decision-making process |
title_sort |
A philosophical approach about judger convictions in the decision-making process |
author |
Filho, Enoque Feitosa Sobreira |
author_facet |
Filho, Enoque Feitosa Sobreira |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Filho, Enoque Feitosa Sobreira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Theory and philosophy of law. Normative implementation. Legal realism. Teoria da decisão. Concretização normativa. Direito e realismo. |
topic |
Theory and philosophy of law. Normative implementation. Legal realism. Teoria da decisão. Concretização normativa. Direito e realismo. |
description |
The object and research problem of this essay is to examine the crisis and the heuristic limits of the conceptual mainstream that tries to circumscribe its understanding of law as a thing that depends only on the legislator, confusing the necessary, if not sufficient, aspect of production of the rule legislated with that other activity, of application and concretization by the public agent that decides in the judicial scope. The question is: why the decision-making and normative process repeatedly underestimated in our jurisprudence (here understanding as theory of law) in terms of legal activity? Our research hypothesis is that although the question demands theoretical efforts from other spheres of the theory of law, none of their practical fields need them to clarify it, since it is self-evident and a realistic examination of the activity decision-making. As for the method, this is a bibliographical research. The theoretical reference is that of legal realism as important general theory and philosophy of law. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-04-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/32022 |
url |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/32022 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/32022/72333 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 19 Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 19 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 19 1984-4255 1984-4247 reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) instacron:UFC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
instacron_str |
UFC |
institution |
UFC |
reponame_str |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
collection |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
argumentos@ufc.br|| |
_version_ |
1797068846457159680 |