Verbal violence and argumentation in democracies

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos, Frederico Rios C. dos
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Entrepalavras
Texto Completo: http://www.entrepalavras.ufc.br/revista/index.php/Revista/article/view/1831
Resumo: Argumentation in public spaces of deliberation in open societies implies responsibility. The non-observance of the so-called “rules of the debate” would thus be an example of the irresponsible public use of word, hindering criticism. One questions if, regarding the vote of Dilma Rousseff’s impeachment in the Chamber of Deputies (analyzed by the transcript of the institution’s shorthand department), these basic rules of argumentation would have been neglected, with regard specifically to the style of approach. It is also questioned how this may have compromised the democratic debate, having as theoretical framework authors such as Angenot (2008) and Danblon (2004). Besides, with the help of categories such as those proposed by Brown and Levinson’s (1987) face theory, inspired by Goffman (1974), the research pointed out that deputies, regardless of their cultural and political orientation, tended to disregard the rules inherent in the debate, and the Parliament, understood as the public sphere of deliberation, revealed itself to be characteristic of dogmatic societies.
id UFC-9_d93d8609f970d9316d96fefb99a914f1
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.localhost:article/1831
network_acronym_str UFC-9
network_name_str Entrepalavras
repository_id_str
spelling Verbal violence and argumentation in democraciesViolência verbal e argumentação em democraciasArgumentation. Democracy. Impeachment.Argumentação. Democracia. Impeachment.Argumentation in public spaces of deliberation in open societies implies responsibility. The non-observance of the so-called “rules of the debate” would thus be an example of the irresponsible public use of word, hindering criticism. One questions if, regarding the vote of Dilma Rousseff’s impeachment in the Chamber of Deputies (analyzed by the transcript of the institution’s shorthand department), these basic rules of argumentation would have been neglected, with regard specifically to the style of approach. It is also questioned how this may have compromised the democratic debate, having as theoretical framework authors such as Angenot (2008) and Danblon (2004). Besides, with the help of categories such as those proposed by Brown and Levinson’s (1987) face theory, inspired by Goffman (1974), the research pointed out that deputies, regardless of their cultural and political orientation, tended to disregard the rules inherent in the debate, and the Parliament, understood as the public sphere of deliberation, revealed itself to be characteristic of dogmatic societies.A argumentação nos espaços públicos de deliberação das sociedades abertas implica a responsabilidade de quem toma a palavra. A inobservância das chamadas “regras do debate” seria, assim, um exemplo do uso público da palavra irresponsável, obstaculizando a crítica. Pergunta-se, com efeito, se, no que diz respeito à votação do impeachment de Dilma Rousseff na Câmara dos Deputados (analisada pela transcrição do departamento de taquigrafia da instituição), essas regras básicas da argumentação teriam sido negligenciadas, tratando especificamente do estilo da abordagem. Indaga-se também como isso pode ter comprometido o debate democrático, tendo como marco teórico autores como Angenot (2008) e Danblon (2004). Além disso, com o auxílio de categorias como as propostas pela teoria das faces de Brown e Levinson (1987), com inspiração em Goffman (1974), a pesquisa apontou no sentido de que, uma vez que os deputados, independentemente de sua orientação cultural e política, tenderam, em sua maioria, a desprezarem regras inerentes ao debate, o Parlamento, entendido como a esfera pública de deliberação, revelou-se próprio das sociedades dogmáticas.Universidade Federal do CearáCAPESSantos, Frederico Rios C. dos2020-07-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.entrepalavras.ufc.br/revista/index.php/Revista/article/view/183110.22168/2237-6321-21831Entrepalavras; v. 10, n. 2 (10)Entrepalavras; v. 10, n. 2 (10)Entrepalavras; v. 10, n. 2 (10)Entrepalavras; v. 10, n. 2 (10)Entrepalavras; v. 10, n. 2 (10)2237-6321reponame:Entrepalavrasinstname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCporhttp://www.entrepalavras.ufc.br/revista/index.php/Revista/article/view/1831/714Direitos autorais 2020 Entrepalavrasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-09-01T00:32:14Zoai:ojs.localhost:article/1831Revistahttp://www.entrepalavras.ufc.br/revista/index.php/Revista/indexPUBhttp://www.entrepalavras.ufc.br/revista/index.php/Revista/oaiwebmaster@entrepalavras.ufc.br||editor@entrepalavras.ufc.br2237-63212237-6321opendoar:2020-09-01T00:32:14Entrepalavras - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Verbal violence and argumentation in democracies
Violência verbal e argumentação em democracias
title Verbal violence and argumentation in democracies
spellingShingle Verbal violence and argumentation in democracies
Santos, Frederico Rios C. dos
Argumentation. Democracy. Impeachment.
Argumentação. Democracia. Impeachment.
title_short Verbal violence and argumentation in democracies
title_full Verbal violence and argumentation in democracies
title_fullStr Verbal violence and argumentation in democracies
title_full_unstemmed Verbal violence and argumentation in democracies
title_sort Verbal violence and argumentation in democracies
author Santos, Frederico Rios C. dos
author_facet Santos, Frederico Rios C. dos
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv
CAPES
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, Frederico Rios C. dos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Argumentation. Democracy. Impeachment.
Argumentação. Democracia. Impeachment.
topic Argumentation. Democracy. Impeachment.
Argumentação. Democracia. Impeachment.
description Argumentation in public spaces of deliberation in open societies implies responsibility. The non-observance of the so-called “rules of the debate” would thus be an example of the irresponsible public use of word, hindering criticism. One questions if, regarding the vote of Dilma Rousseff’s impeachment in the Chamber of Deputies (analyzed by the transcript of the institution’s shorthand department), these basic rules of argumentation would have been neglected, with regard specifically to the style of approach. It is also questioned how this may have compromised the democratic debate, having as theoretical framework authors such as Angenot (2008) and Danblon (2004). Besides, with the help of categories such as those proposed by Brown and Levinson’s (1987) face theory, inspired by Goffman (1974), the research pointed out that deputies, regardless of their cultural and political orientation, tended to disregard the rules inherent in the debate, and the Parliament, understood as the public sphere of deliberation, revealed itself to be characteristic of dogmatic societies.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-07-17
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.entrepalavras.ufc.br/revista/index.php/Revista/article/view/1831
10.22168/2237-6321-21831
url http://www.entrepalavras.ufc.br/revista/index.php/Revista/article/view/1831
identifier_str_mv 10.22168/2237-6321-21831
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.entrepalavras.ufc.br/revista/index.php/Revista/article/view/1831/714
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2020 Entrepalavras
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2020 Entrepalavras
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Entrepalavras; v. 10, n. 2 (10)
Entrepalavras; v. 10, n. 2 (10)
Entrepalavras; v. 10, n. 2 (10)
Entrepalavras; v. 10, n. 2 (10)
Entrepalavras; v. 10, n. 2 (10)
2237-6321
reponame:Entrepalavras
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Entrepalavras
collection Entrepalavras
repository.name.fl_str_mv Entrepalavras - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv webmaster@entrepalavras.ufc.br||editor@entrepalavras.ufc.br
_version_ 1798329728314114048