The role of the media in the impeachment processes of Dilma Rousseff (2016) and Michel Temer (2017)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Contracampo |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uff.br/contracampo/article/view/17626 |
Resumo: | The tense relationship between media and politics in Brazil is well known by specialized literature. Getúlio Vargas, João Goulart and Fernando Collor are examples of presidents who did not finish their mandates and who suffered resistance from the press. This article argues that this history of the media in destabilization processes remains current. The hypothesis was tested from the observation of 35 editorials of Brazil's main print newspapers, during Dilma Rousseff's impeachment in 2016 and the opening of Michel Temer's investigation in 2017. The first case had a certain unity between these newspapers, and the impeachment was victorious; in the second case, there was divergence and the impeachment did not occur. |
id |
UFF-5_e24ec292c066408602a3b2fc4bf83655 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/17626 |
network_acronym_str |
UFF-5 |
network_name_str |
Contracampo |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The role of the media in the impeachment processes of Dilma Rousseff (2016) and Michel Temer (2017)O papel da mídia nos processos de impeachment de Dilma Rousseff (2016) e Michel Temer (2017)ImpeachmentMediaDemocracyImpeachmentDemocraciaMídiaThe tense relationship between media and politics in Brazil is well known by specialized literature. Getúlio Vargas, João Goulart and Fernando Collor are examples of presidents who did not finish their mandates and who suffered resistance from the press. This article argues that this history of the media in destabilization processes remains current. The hypothesis was tested from the observation of 35 editorials of Brazil's main print newspapers, during Dilma Rousseff's impeachment in 2016 and the opening of Michel Temer's investigation in 2017. The first case had a certain unity between these newspapers, and the impeachment was victorious; in the second case, there was divergence and the impeachment did not occur.As tensas relações entre mídia e política no Brasil são bem conhecidas pela literatura especializada. Getúlio Vargas, João Goulart e Fernando Collor são alguns exemplos de presidentes que não terminaram seus mandatos e que sofreram resistências por parte da imprensa. O presente artigo argumenta que esse histórico de atuação dos meios de comunicação em processos de desestabilização permanece atual. A hipótese foi testada a partir da observação de 35 editoriais dos principais jornais impressos do país durante a tramitação dos processos de impeachment de Dilma Rousseff em 2016 e de investigação de Michel Temer em 2017. O primeiro caso contou com certa unidade entre esses jornais, e o impeachment foi vitorioso; no segundo, houve divergências na imprensa e o impeachment não ocorreu.Programa de Pós-Graduação em Comunicação da Universidade Federal Fluminense2018-08-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uff.br/contracampo/article/view/1762610.22409/contracampo.v0i0.1108Contracampo; v. 37 n. 2 (2018): Depois do Golpe: a Comunicação Política em Tempos de Pós-Democracia2238-25771414-748310.22409/contracampo.v37i2reponame:Contracampoinstname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)instacron:UFFporenghttps://periodicos.uff.br/contracampo/article/view/17626/pdfhttps://periodicos.uff.br/contracampo/article/view/17626/1108Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Contracampoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRodrigues, Theófilo Machado2018-12-13T17:15:26Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/17626Revistahttps://periodicos.uff.br/contracampoPUBhttps://periodicos.uff.br/contracampo/oai||contracampo.uff@gmail.com2238-25771414-7483opendoar:2018-12-13T17:15:26Contracampo - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The role of the media in the impeachment processes of Dilma Rousseff (2016) and Michel Temer (2017) O papel da mídia nos processos de impeachment de Dilma Rousseff (2016) e Michel Temer (2017) |
title |
The role of the media in the impeachment processes of Dilma Rousseff (2016) and Michel Temer (2017) |
spellingShingle |
The role of the media in the impeachment processes of Dilma Rousseff (2016) and Michel Temer (2017) Rodrigues, Theófilo Machado Impeachment Media Democracy Impeachment Democracia Mídia |
title_short |
The role of the media in the impeachment processes of Dilma Rousseff (2016) and Michel Temer (2017) |
title_full |
The role of the media in the impeachment processes of Dilma Rousseff (2016) and Michel Temer (2017) |
title_fullStr |
The role of the media in the impeachment processes of Dilma Rousseff (2016) and Michel Temer (2017) |
title_full_unstemmed |
The role of the media in the impeachment processes of Dilma Rousseff (2016) and Michel Temer (2017) |
title_sort |
The role of the media in the impeachment processes of Dilma Rousseff (2016) and Michel Temer (2017) |
author |
Rodrigues, Theófilo Machado |
author_facet |
Rodrigues, Theófilo Machado |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rodrigues, Theófilo Machado |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Impeachment Media Democracy Impeachment Democracia Mídia |
topic |
Impeachment Media Democracy Impeachment Democracia Mídia |
description |
The tense relationship between media and politics in Brazil is well known by specialized literature. Getúlio Vargas, João Goulart and Fernando Collor are examples of presidents who did not finish their mandates and who suffered resistance from the press. This article argues that this history of the media in destabilization processes remains current. The hypothesis was tested from the observation of 35 editorials of Brazil's main print newspapers, during Dilma Rousseff's impeachment in 2016 and the opening of Michel Temer's investigation in 2017. The first case had a certain unity between these newspapers, and the impeachment was victorious; in the second case, there was divergence and the impeachment did not occur. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-08-28 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uff.br/contracampo/article/view/17626 10.22409/contracampo.v0i0.1108 |
url |
https://periodicos.uff.br/contracampo/article/view/17626 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22409/contracampo.v0i0.1108 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uff.br/contracampo/article/view/17626/pdf https://periodicos.uff.br/contracampo/article/view/17626/1108 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Contracampo info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Contracampo |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Comunicação da Universidade Federal Fluminense |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Comunicação da Universidade Federal Fluminense |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Contracampo; v. 37 n. 2 (2018): Depois do Golpe: a Comunicação Política em Tempos de Pós-Democracia 2238-2577 1414-7483 10.22409/contracampo.v37i2 reponame:Contracampo instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) instacron:UFF |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
instacron_str |
UFF |
institution |
UFF |
reponame_str |
Contracampo |
collection |
Contracampo |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Contracampo - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||contracampo.uff@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799705522212962304 |