Air quality in swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662017000500339 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to evaluate the concentration of gases in three swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies, regarding floor and dividers. The experiment compared three treatments: pen with water depth, pen with partially slotted floor on the sides, and pen with partially slotted floor on sides and in the center. Measurements of instantaneous concentrations of ammonia (NH3 ppm) and carbon dioxide (CO2 ppm) were taken at animal level. The levels of sound pressure (dB) at animal level and at 1.50 m from the floor were also recorded. It was observed that the pen with water depth was the one with the highest average concentration of NH3. Although there was a significant difference in CO2 concentrations, the observed values are within the limits allowed by the Brazilian standards; thus, it is assumed that the facilities do not cause discomfort in relation to CO2 levels. The pen with water depth possibly caused discomfort to the animals, since the NH3 concentration was above the values that can cause problems to the animals, according to the recommendation of the literature. There was no influence of the type of pen on the sound pressure at any time. |
id |
UFCG-1_8c403d507b9f6308a4a9b983a5901860 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1415-43662017000500339 |
network_acronym_str |
UFCG-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Air quality in swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologiesanimal welfarerural buildingsgas concentrationsound pressureABSTRACT The objective of this study was to evaluate the concentration of gases in three swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies, regarding floor and dividers. The experiment compared three treatments: pen with water depth, pen with partially slotted floor on the sides, and pen with partially slotted floor on sides and in the center. Measurements of instantaneous concentrations of ammonia (NH3 ppm) and carbon dioxide (CO2 ppm) were taken at animal level. The levels of sound pressure (dB) at animal level and at 1.50 m from the floor were also recorded. It was observed that the pen with water depth was the one with the highest average concentration of NH3. Although there was a significant difference in CO2 concentrations, the observed values are within the limits allowed by the Brazilian standards; thus, it is assumed that the facilities do not cause discomfort in relation to CO2 levels. The pen with water depth possibly caused discomfort to the animals, since the NH3 concentration was above the values that can cause problems to the animals, according to the recommendation of the literature. There was no influence of the type of pen on the sound pressure at any time.Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola - UFCG2017-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662017000500339Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental v.21 n.5 2017reponame:Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG)instacron:UFCG10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v21n5p339-343info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCecchin,DaianeCampos,Alessandro T.Cruz,Vasco F. daSousa,Francine A.Amaral,Pedro I. S.Yanagi Junior,Tadayukieng2017-05-16T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1415-43662017000500339Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbeaaPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||agriambi@agriambi.com.br1807-19291415-4366opendoar:2017-05-16T00:00Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) - Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Air quality in swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies |
title |
Air quality in swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies |
spellingShingle |
Air quality in swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies Cecchin,Daiane animal welfare rural buildings gas concentration sound pressure |
title_short |
Air quality in swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies |
title_full |
Air quality in swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies |
title_fullStr |
Air quality in swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Air quality in swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies |
title_sort |
Air quality in swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies |
author |
Cecchin,Daiane |
author_facet |
Cecchin,Daiane Campos,Alessandro T. Cruz,Vasco F. da Sousa,Francine A. Amaral,Pedro I. S. Yanagi Junior,Tadayuki |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Campos,Alessandro T. Cruz,Vasco F. da Sousa,Francine A. Amaral,Pedro I. S. Yanagi Junior,Tadayuki |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cecchin,Daiane Campos,Alessandro T. Cruz,Vasco F. da Sousa,Francine A. Amaral,Pedro I. S. Yanagi Junior,Tadayuki |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
animal welfare rural buildings gas concentration sound pressure |
topic |
animal welfare rural buildings gas concentration sound pressure |
description |
ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to evaluate the concentration of gases in three swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies, regarding floor and dividers. The experiment compared three treatments: pen with water depth, pen with partially slotted floor on the sides, and pen with partially slotted floor on sides and in the center. Measurements of instantaneous concentrations of ammonia (NH3 ppm) and carbon dioxide (CO2 ppm) were taken at animal level. The levels of sound pressure (dB) at animal level and at 1.50 m from the floor were also recorded. It was observed that the pen with water depth was the one with the highest average concentration of NH3. Although there was a significant difference in CO2 concentrations, the observed values are within the limits allowed by the Brazilian standards; thus, it is assumed that the facilities do not cause discomfort in relation to CO2 levels. The pen with water depth possibly caused discomfort to the animals, since the NH3 concentration was above the values that can cause problems to the animals, according to the recommendation of the literature. There was no influence of the type of pen on the sound pressure at any time. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-05-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662017000500339 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662017000500339 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v21n5p339-343 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola - UFCG |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola - UFCG |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental v.21 n.5 2017 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG) instacron:UFCG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG) |
instacron_str |
UFCG |
institution |
UFCG |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) - Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||agriambi@agriambi.com.br |
_version_ |
1750297685510848512 |