PLOT SIZE, NUMBER OF TREATMENTS AND REPLICATES AND EXPERIMENTAL PRECISION IN BUCKWHEAT
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Caatinga |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/9286 |
Resumo: | The objective of this work was to determine the optimal plot size to evaluate the fresh weight in buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) of the IPR91-Baili and IPR92-Altar cultivars, in scenarios formed by combinations of numbers of treatments, numbers of replicates, and levels of experimental precision. Sixteen uniformity trials (blank experiments) were carried out, eight with cultivar IPR91-Baili and eight with cultivar IPR92-Altar. The trials were performed in eight sowing dates. The fresh weight was evaluated in 576 basic experimental units (BEU) of 1 m × 1 m (36 BEU per trial). The soil heterogeneity index of Smith (1938) was estimated. The plot size was determined by the method of Hatheway (1961) in scenarios formed by combinations of i treatments (i = 5, 10, 15, and 20), r replicates (r = 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8), and d precision levels (d = 10%, 11%, 12%, 13%, 14%, 15%, 16%, 17%, 18%, 19%, and 20%). To evaluate the fresh weight in buckwheat of the IPR91-Baili and IPR92-Altar cultivars, in experiments under completely randomized and randomized block designs, with 5 to 20 treatments and eight replicates, plots of 8 m2 of useful area are sufficient to identify significant differences between treatments, at 5% probability level, of 15% of the overall mean of the experiment. |
id |
UFERSA-1_48bcbaa6518383e1800dc7ab46640224 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/9286 |
network_acronym_str |
UFERSA-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Caatinga |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
PLOT SIZE, NUMBER OF TREATMENTS AND REPLICATES AND EXPERIMENTAL PRECISION IN BUCKWHEATTAMANHO DE PARCELA, NÚMEROS DE TRATAMENTOS E DE REPETIÇÕES E A PRECISÃO EXPERIMENTAL EM TRIGO MOURISCOFagopyrum esculentum Moench. Cultura de cobertura de solo. Ensaio de uniformidade. Dimensionamento experimental.Fagopyrum esculentum Moench. Soil cover crop. Uniformity trial. Experimental design.The objective of this work was to determine the optimal plot size to evaluate the fresh weight in buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) of the IPR91-Baili and IPR92-Altar cultivars, in scenarios formed by combinations of numbers of treatments, numbers of replicates, and levels of experimental precision. Sixteen uniformity trials (blank experiments) were carried out, eight with cultivar IPR91-Baili and eight with cultivar IPR92-Altar. The trials were performed in eight sowing dates. The fresh weight was evaluated in 576 basic experimental units (BEU) of 1 m × 1 m (36 BEU per trial). The soil heterogeneity index of Smith (1938) was estimated. The plot size was determined by the method of Hatheway (1961) in scenarios formed by combinations of i treatments (i = 5, 10, 15, and 20), r replicates (r = 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8), and d precision levels (d = 10%, 11%, 12%, 13%, 14%, 15%, 16%, 17%, 18%, 19%, and 20%). To evaluate the fresh weight in buckwheat of the IPR91-Baili and IPR92-Altar cultivars, in experiments under completely randomized and randomized block designs, with 5 to 20 treatments and eight replicates, plots of 8 m2 of useful area are sufficient to identify significant differences between treatments, at 5% probability level, of 15% of the overall mean of the experiment. O objetivo deste trabalho foi determinar o tamanho ótimo de parcela para avaliar a massa de matéria fresca de trigo mourisco (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) das cultivares IPR91-Baili e IPR92-Altar, em cenários formados por combinações de números de tratamentos, números de repetições e níveis de precisão experimental. Foram conduzidos 16 ensaios de uniformidade (experimentos em branco), sendo oito com a cultivar IPR91-Baili e oito com a cultivar IPR92-Altar. Os ensaios foram realizados em oito épocas de semeadura. Foi avaliada a massa de matéria fresca em 576 unidades experimentais básicas (UEB) de 1 m × 1 m (36 UEB por ensaio). Foi estimado o índice de heterogeneidade do solo de Smith (1938). Foi determinado o tamanho de parcela por meio do método de Hatheway (1961) em cenários formados pelas combinações de i tratamentos (i = 5, 10, 15 e 20), r repetições (r = 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 e 8) e d níveis de precisão (d = 10%, 11%, 12%, 13%, 14%, 15%, 16%, 17%, 18%, 19% e 20%). Para avaliar a massa de matéria fresca de trigo mourisco das cultivares IPR91-Baili e IPR92-Altar, nos delineamentos inteiramente casualizado e blocos completos ao acaso, com 5 a 20 tratamentos e oito repetições, parcelas de 8 m2 de área útil são suficientes para identificar diferenças significativas entre tratamentos, a 5% de probabilidade, de 15% da média geral do experimento.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2020-10-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/928610.1590/1983-21252020v33n428rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 33 No. 4 (2020); 1131-1139Revista Caatinga; v. 33 n. 4 (2020); 1131-11391983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/9286/10380Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Caatingainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCargnelutti Filho, AlbertoNeu, Ismael Mario MárcioSouza, Jéssica Maronez dePezzini, Rafael VieiraDumke, Gabriel EliasSomavilla, Felipe Manfio2023-07-21T16:48:10Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/9286Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2024-04-29T09:46:47.371191Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
PLOT SIZE, NUMBER OF TREATMENTS AND REPLICATES AND EXPERIMENTAL PRECISION IN BUCKWHEAT TAMANHO DE PARCELA, NÚMEROS DE TRATAMENTOS E DE REPETIÇÕES E A PRECISÃO EXPERIMENTAL EM TRIGO MOURISCO |
title |
PLOT SIZE, NUMBER OF TREATMENTS AND REPLICATES AND EXPERIMENTAL PRECISION IN BUCKWHEAT |
spellingShingle |
PLOT SIZE, NUMBER OF TREATMENTS AND REPLICATES AND EXPERIMENTAL PRECISION IN BUCKWHEAT Cargnelutti Filho, Alberto Fagopyrum esculentum Moench. Cultura de cobertura de solo. Ensaio de uniformidade. Dimensionamento experimental. Fagopyrum esculentum Moench. Soil cover crop. Uniformity trial. Experimental design. |
title_short |
PLOT SIZE, NUMBER OF TREATMENTS AND REPLICATES AND EXPERIMENTAL PRECISION IN BUCKWHEAT |
title_full |
PLOT SIZE, NUMBER OF TREATMENTS AND REPLICATES AND EXPERIMENTAL PRECISION IN BUCKWHEAT |
title_fullStr |
PLOT SIZE, NUMBER OF TREATMENTS AND REPLICATES AND EXPERIMENTAL PRECISION IN BUCKWHEAT |
title_full_unstemmed |
PLOT SIZE, NUMBER OF TREATMENTS AND REPLICATES AND EXPERIMENTAL PRECISION IN BUCKWHEAT |
title_sort |
PLOT SIZE, NUMBER OF TREATMENTS AND REPLICATES AND EXPERIMENTAL PRECISION IN BUCKWHEAT |
author |
Cargnelutti Filho, Alberto |
author_facet |
Cargnelutti Filho, Alberto Neu, Ismael Mario Márcio Souza, Jéssica Maronez de Pezzini, Rafael Vieira Dumke, Gabriel Elias Somavilla, Felipe Manfio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Neu, Ismael Mario Márcio Souza, Jéssica Maronez de Pezzini, Rafael Vieira Dumke, Gabriel Elias Somavilla, Felipe Manfio |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cargnelutti Filho, Alberto Neu, Ismael Mario Márcio Souza, Jéssica Maronez de Pezzini, Rafael Vieira Dumke, Gabriel Elias Somavilla, Felipe Manfio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Fagopyrum esculentum Moench. Cultura de cobertura de solo. Ensaio de uniformidade. Dimensionamento experimental. Fagopyrum esculentum Moench. Soil cover crop. Uniformity trial. Experimental design. |
topic |
Fagopyrum esculentum Moench. Cultura de cobertura de solo. Ensaio de uniformidade. Dimensionamento experimental. Fagopyrum esculentum Moench. Soil cover crop. Uniformity trial. Experimental design. |
description |
The objective of this work was to determine the optimal plot size to evaluate the fresh weight in buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) of the IPR91-Baili and IPR92-Altar cultivars, in scenarios formed by combinations of numbers of treatments, numbers of replicates, and levels of experimental precision. Sixteen uniformity trials (blank experiments) were carried out, eight with cultivar IPR91-Baili and eight with cultivar IPR92-Altar. The trials were performed in eight sowing dates. The fresh weight was evaluated in 576 basic experimental units (BEU) of 1 m × 1 m (36 BEU per trial). The soil heterogeneity index of Smith (1938) was estimated. The plot size was determined by the method of Hatheway (1961) in scenarios formed by combinations of i treatments (i = 5, 10, 15, and 20), r replicates (r = 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8), and d precision levels (d = 10%, 11%, 12%, 13%, 14%, 15%, 16%, 17%, 18%, 19%, and 20%). To evaluate the fresh weight in buckwheat of the IPR91-Baili and IPR92-Altar cultivars, in experiments under completely randomized and randomized block designs, with 5 to 20 treatments and eight replicates, plots of 8 m2 of useful area are sufficient to identify significant differences between treatments, at 5% probability level, of 15% of the overall mean of the experiment. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-10-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/9286 10.1590/1983-21252020v33n428rc |
url |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/9286 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1983-21252020v33n428rc |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/9286/10380 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Caatinga info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Caatinga |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 33 No. 4 (2020); 1131-1139 Revista Caatinga; v. 33 n. 4 (2020); 1131-1139 1983-2125 0100-316X reponame:Revista Caatinga instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) instacron:UFERSA |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
instacron_str |
UFERSA |
institution |
UFERSA |
reponame_str |
Revista Caatinga |
collection |
Revista Caatinga |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br |
_version_ |
1797674028447563776 |