PLOT SIZE, NUMBER OF TREATMENTS AND REPLICATES AND EXPERIMENTAL PRECISION IN BUCKWHEAT

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cargnelutti Filho, Alberto
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Neu, Ismael Mario Márcio, Souza, Jéssica Maronez de, Pezzini, Rafael Vieira, Dumke, Gabriel Elias, Somavilla, Felipe Manfio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Caatinga
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/9286
Resumo: The objective of this work was to determine the optimal plot size to evaluate the fresh weight in buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) of the IPR91-Baili and IPR92-Altar cultivars, in scenarios formed by combinations of numbers of treatments, numbers of replicates, and levels of experimental precision. Sixteen uniformity trials (blank experiments) were carried out, eight with cultivar IPR91-Baili and eight with cultivar IPR92-Altar. The trials were performed in eight sowing dates. The fresh weight was evaluated in 576 basic experimental units (BEU) of   1 m × 1 m (36 BEU per trial). The soil heterogeneity index of Smith (1938) was estimated. The plot size was determined by the method of Hatheway (1961) in scenarios formed by combinations of i treatments (i = 5, 10, 15, and 20), r replicates (r = 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8), and d precision levels (d = 10%, 11%, 12%, 13%, 14%, 15%, 16%, 17%, 18%, 19%, and 20%). To evaluate the fresh weight in buckwheat of the IPR91-Baili and IPR92-Altar cultivars, in experiments under completely randomized and randomized block designs, with 5 to 20 treatments and eight replicates, plots of 8 m2 of useful area are sufficient to identify significant differences between treatments, at 5% probability level, of 15% of the overall mean of the experiment.  
id UFERSA-1_48bcbaa6518383e1800dc7ab46640224
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/9286
network_acronym_str UFERSA-1
network_name_str Revista Caatinga
repository_id_str
spelling PLOT SIZE, NUMBER OF TREATMENTS AND REPLICATES AND EXPERIMENTAL PRECISION IN BUCKWHEATTAMANHO DE PARCELA, NÚMEROS DE TRATAMENTOS E DE REPETIÇÕES E A PRECISÃO EXPERIMENTAL EM TRIGO MOURISCOFagopyrum esculentum Moench. Cultura de cobertura de solo. Ensaio de uniformidade. Dimensionamento experimental.Fagopyrum esculentum Moench. Soil cover crop. Uniformity trial. Experimental design.The objective of this work was to determine the optimal plot size to evaluate the fresh weight in buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) of the IPR91-Baili and IPR92-Altar cultivars, in scenarios formed by combinations of numbers of treatments, numbers of replicates, and levels of experimental precision. Sixteen uniformity trials (blank experiments) were carried out, eight with cultivar IPR91-Baili and eight with cultivar IPR92-Altar. The trials were performed in eight sowing dates. The fresh weight was evaluated in 576 basic experimental units (BEU) of   1 m × 1 m (36 BEU per trial). The soil heterogeneity index of Smith (1938) was estimated. The plot size was determined by the method of Hatheway (1961) in scenarios formed by combinations of i treatments (i = 5, 10, 15, and 20), r replicates (r = 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8), and d precision levels (d = 10%, 11%, 12%, 13%, 14%, 15%, 16%, 17%, 18%, 19%, and 20%). To evaluate the fresh weight in buckwheat of the IPR91-Baili and IPR92-Altar cultivars, in experiments under completely randomized and randomized block designs, with 5 to 20 treatments and eight replicates, plots of 8 m2 of useful area are sufficient to identify significant differences between treatments, at 5% probability level, of 15% of the overall mean of the experiment.  O objetivo deste trabalho foi determinar o tamanho ótimo de parcela para avaliar a massa de matéria fresca de trigo mourisco (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) das cultivares IPR91-Baili e IPR92-Altar, em cenários formados por combinações de números de tratamentos, números de repetições e níveis de precisão experimental. Foram conduzidos 16 ensaios de uniformidade (experimentos em branco), sendo oito com a cultivar IPR91-Baili e oito com a cultivar IPR92-Altar. Os ensaios foram realizados em oito épocas de semeadura. Foi avaliada a massa de matéria fresca em 576 unidades experimentais básicas (UEB) de 1 m × 1 m (36 UEB por ensaio). Foi estimado o índice de heterogeneidade do solo de Smith (1938). Foi determinado o tamanho de parcela por meio do método de Hatheway (1961) em cenários formados pelas combinações de i tratamentos (i = 5, 10, 15 e 20), r repetições (r = 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 e 8) e d níveis de precisão (d = 10%, 11%, 12%, 13%, 14%, 15%, 16%, 17%, 18%, 19% e 20%). Para avaliar a massa de matéria fresca de trigo mourisco das cultivares IPR91-Baili e IPR92-Altar, nos delineamentos inteiramente casualizado e blocos completos ao acaso, com 5 a 20 tratamentos e oito repetições, parcelas de 8 m2 de área útil são suficientes para identificar diferenças significativas entre tratamentos, a 5% de probabilidade, de 15% da média geral do experimento.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2020-10-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/928610.1590/1983-21252020v33n428rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 33 No. 4 (2020); 1131-1139Revista Caatinga; v. 33 n. 4 (2020); 1131-11391983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/9286/10380Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Caatingainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCargnelutti Filho, AlbertoNeu, Ismael Mario MárcioSouza, Jéssica Maronez dePezzini, Rafael VieiraDumke, Gabriel EliasSomavilla, Felipe Manfio2023-07-21T16:48:10Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/9286Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2024-04-29T09:46:47.371191Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv PLOT SIZE, NUMBER OF TREATMENTS AND REPLICATES AND EXPERIMENTAL PRECISION IN BUCKWHEAT
TAMANHO DE PARCELA, NÚMEROS DE TRATAMENTOS E DE REPETIÇÕES E A PRECISÃO EXPERIMENTAL EM TRIGO MOURISCO
title PLOT SIZE, NUMBER OF TREATMENTS AND REPLICATES AND EXPERIMENTAL PRECISION IN BUCKWHEAT
spellingShingle PLOT SIZE, NUMBER OF TREATMENTS AND REPLICATES AND EXPERIMENTAL PRECISION IN BUCKWHEAT
Cargnelutti Filho, Alberto
Fagopyrum esculentum Moench. Cultura de cobertura de solo. Ensaio de uniformidade. Dimensionamento experimental.
Fagopyrum esculentum Moench. Soil cover crop. Uniformity trial. Experimental design.
title_short PLOT SIZE, NUMBER OF TREATMENTS AND REPLICATES AND EXPERIMENTAL PRECISION IN BUCKWHEAT
title_full PLOT SIZE, NUMBER OF TREATMENTS AND REPLICATES AND EXPERIMENTAL PRECISION IN BUCKWHEAT
title_fullStr PLOT SIZE, NUMBER OF TREATMENTS AND REPLICATES AND EXPERIMENTAL PRECISION IN BUCKWHEAT
title_full_unstemmed PLOT SIZE, NUMBER OF TREATMENTS AND REPLICATES AND EXPERIMENTAL PRECISION IN BUCKWHEAT
title_sort PLOT SIZE, NUMBER OF TREATMENTS AND REPLICATES AND EXPERIMENTAL PRECISION IN BUCKWHEAT
author Cargnelutti Filho, Alberto
author_facet Cargnelutti Filho, Alberto
Neu, Ismael Mario Márcio
Souza, Jéssica Maronez de
Pezzini, Rafael Vieira
Dumke, Gabriel Elias
Somavilla, Felipe Manfio
author_role author
author2 Neu, Ismael Mario Márcio
Souza, Jéssica Maronez de
Pezzini, Rafael Vieira
Dumke, Gabriel Elias
Somavilla, Felipe Manfio
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cargnelutti Filho, Alberto
Neu, Ismael Mario Márcio
Souza, Jéssica Maronez de
Pezzini, Rafael Vieira
Dumke, Gabriel Elias
Somavilla, Felipe Manfio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Fagopyrum esculentum Moench. Cultura de cobertura de solo. Ensaio de uniformidade. Dimensionamento experimental.
Fagopyrum esculentum Moench. Soil cover crop. Uniformity trial. Experimental design.
topic Fagopyrum esculentum Moench. Cultura de cobertura de solo. Ensaio de uniformidade. Dimensionamento experimental.
Fagopyrum esculentum Moench. Soil cover crop. Uniformity trial. Experimental design.
description The objective of this work was to determine the optimal plot size to evaluate the fresh weight in buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) of the IPR91-Baili and IPR92-Altar cultivars, in scenarios formed by combinations of numbers of treatments, numbers of replicates, and levels of experimental precision. Sixteen uniformity trials (blank experiments) were carried out, eight with cultivar IPR91-Baili and eight with cultivar IPR92-Altar. The trials were performed in eight sowing dates. The fresh weight was evaluated in 576 basic experimental units (BEU) of   1 m × 1 m (36 BEU per trial). The soil heterogeneity index of Smith (1938) was estimated. The plot size was determined by the method of Hatheway (1961) in scenarios formed by combinations of i treatments (i = 5, 10, 15, and 20), r replicates (r = 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8), and d precision levels (d = 10%, 11%, 12%, 13%, 14%, 15%, 16%, 17%, 18%, 19%, and 20%). To evaluate the fresh weight in buckwheat of the IPR91-Baili and IPR92-Altar cultivars, in experiments under completely randomized and randomized block designs, with 5 to 20 treatments and eight replicates, plots of 8 m2 of useful area are sufficient to identify significant differences between treatments, at 5% probability level, of 15% of the overall mean of the experiment.  
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-10-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/9286
10.1590/1983-21252020v33n428rc
url https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/9286
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1983-21252020v33n428rc
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/9286/10380
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Caatinga
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Caatinga
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 33 No. 4 (2020); 1131-1139
Revista Caatinga; v. 33 n. 4 (2020); 1131-1139
1983-2125
0100-316X
reponame:Revista Caatinga
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron:UFERSA
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron_str UFERSA
institution UFERSA
reponame_str Revista Caatinga
collection Revista Caatinga
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br
_version_ 1797674028447563776