AGRONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS, COOKING AND POSTHARVEST CONSERVATION FOR SELECTING SWEET CASSAVA CLONES

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos, Vanderlei da Silva
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Santos , Maria Luiza Miranda dos, Sasaki, Fabiana Fumi Cerqueira, Oliveira, Luciana Alves de, Ledo, Carlos Alberto da Silva
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Caatinga
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/10298
Resumo: The objective of this work was to evaluate the agronomic performance, cooking time and postharvest conservation of roots of sweet cassava clones, to select those superior to the Manteiga variety control, in the Baixo Sul region of Bahia state. A randomized block design in split plot scheme, with three replications was used. Eleven genotypes were evaluated at 10 and 12 months after planting. Considering the mean of two harvests, BRS Kiriris and Saracura showed total root yield (39.85 and 33.91 t ha-1, respectively) and commercial root yield (26.54 and 26.71 t ha-1) that are higher compared to Manteiga (total root yield: 28.06 t ha-1, commercial root yield: 16.95 t ha-1). However, both had cooking time (26.76 and 28.30 min, respectively) higher than that of Manteiga (23.89 min), and BRS Kiriris was unstable regarding the cooking percentage between 10 (91.67%) and 12 months (50%). BRS Aipim Brasil, 2003 14-11, BRS Kiriris, Eucalipto, Saracura and Manteiga were more tolerant to postharvest physiological deterioration. Although some of the evaluated clones presented good performance in the evaluated traits, by analyzing the set of traits, none of them shows sufficient superiority to be indicated as a potential substitute for Manteiga, grown in the Baixo Sul region of Bahia state.
id UFERSA-1_ed9b4e05ca8ea1134f33497e8f889a7d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/10298
network_acronym_str UFERSA-1
network_name_str Revista Caatinga
repository_id_str
spelling AGRONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS, COOKING AND POSTHARVEST CONSERVATION FOR SELECTING SWEET CASSAVA CLONESCARACTERÍSTICAS AGRONÔMICAS, COZIMENTO E CONSERVAÇÃO PÓS-COLHEITA PARA SELEÇÃO DE CLONES DE MANDIOCA DE MESAManihot esculenta. Deterioração fisiológica de pós-colheita. Raízes comerciais.Manihot esculenta. Postharvest physiological deterioration. Commercial roots.The objective of this work was to evaluate the agronomic performance, cooking time and postharvest conservation of roots of sweet cassava clones, to select those superior to the Manteiga variety control, in the Baixo Sul region of Bahia state. A randomized block design in split plot scheme, with three replications was used. Eleven genotypes were evaluated at 10 and 12 months after planting. Considering the mean of two harvests, BRS Kiriris and Saracura showed total root yield (39.85 and 33.91 t ha-1, respectively) and commercial root yield (26.54 and 26.71 t ha-1) that are higher compared to Manteiga (total root yield: 28.06 t ha-1, commercial root yield: 16.95 t ha-1). However, both had cooking time (26.76 and 28.30 min, respectively) higher than that of Manteiga (23.89 min), and BRS Kiriris was unstable regarding the cooking percentage between 10 (91.67%) and 12 months (50%). BRS Aipim Brasil, 2003 14-11, BRS Kiriris, Eucalipto, Saracura and Manteiga were more tolerant to postharvest physiological deterioration. Although some of the evaluated clones presented good performance in the evaluated traits, by analyzing the set of traits, none of them shows sufficient superiority to be indicated as a potential substitute for Manteiga, grown in the Baixo Sul region of Bahia state.O objetivo desse trabalho foi avaliar desempenho agronômico, tempo de cozimento e conservação pós-colheita de raízes de clones de mandioca de mesa, para selecionar aqueles superiores à testemunha Manteiga, na região do Baixo Sul do estado da Bahia. O delineamento foi em blocos casualizados e em esquema de parcelas subdivididas, com três repetições. Onze clones foram avaliados aos 10 e 12 meses após o plantio. Na média das duas colheitas, BRS Kiriris e Saracura tiveram produção total de raízes (39,85 e 33,91 t ha-1, respectivamente) e produção de raízes comerciais (26,54 e 26,71 t ha-1) superiores, comparados ao Manteiga (produção total de raízes: 28,06 t ha-1, produção de raízes comerciais: 16,95 t ha-1). Entretanto, ambos tiveram tempo de cozimento (26,76 e 28,30 min, respectivamente) maiores que o do Manteiga (23,89 min), e BRS Kiriris foi instável com relação à porcentagem de cozimento entre 10 (91,67%) e 12 meses (50%). BRS Aipim Brasil, 2003 14-11, BRS Kiriris, Eucalipto, Saracura e Manteiga foram mais tolerantes à deterioração fisiológica de pós-colheita. Embora alguns dos clones avaliados tenham apresentado bom desempenho nas características avaliadas, analisando-se o conjunto de características, nenhum deles apresenta superioridade suficiente para ser indicado como um potencial substituto do Manteiga, cultivado na região do Baixo Sul do estado da Bahia.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2022-07-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/1029810.1590/1983-21252022v35n324rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 35 No. 3 (2022); 730-738Revista Caatinga; v. 35 n. 3 (2022); 730-7381983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/10298/11003Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Caatingainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Vanderlei da SilvaSantos , Maria Luiza Miranda dosSasaki, Fabiana Fumi CerqueiraOliveira, Luciana Alves deLedo, Carlos Alberto da Silva2023-07-03T14:10:21Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/10298Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2024-04-29T09:46:55.970969Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv AGRONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS, COOKING AND POSTHARVEST CONSERVATION FOR SELECTING SWEET CASSAVA CLONES
CARACTERÍSTICAS AGRONÔMICAS, COZIMENTO E CONSERVAÇÃO PÓS-COLHEITA PARA SELEÇÃO DE CLONES DE MANDIOCA DE MESA
title AGRONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS, COOKING AND POSTHARVEST CONSERVATION FOR SELECTING SWEET CASSAVA CLONES
spellingShingle AGRONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS, COOKING AND POSTHARVEST CONSERVATION FOR SELECTING SWEET CASSAVA CLONES
Santos, Vanderlei da Silva
Manihot esculenta. Deterioração fisiológica de pós-colheita. Raízes comerciais.
Manihot esculenta. Postharvest physiological deterioration. Commercial roots.
title_short AGRONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS, COOKING AND POSTHARVEST CONSERVATION FOR SELECTING SWEET CASSAVA CLONES
title_full AGRONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS, COOKING AND POSTHARVEST CONSERVATION FOR SELECTING SWEET CASSAVA CLONES
title_fullStr AGRONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS, COOKING AND POSTHARVEST CONSERVATION FOR SELECTING SWEET CASSAVA CLONES
title_full_unstemmed AGRONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS, COOKING AND POSTHARVEST CONSERVATION FOR SELECTING SWEET CASSAVA CLONES
title_sort AGRONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS, COOKING AND POSTHARVEST CONSERVATION FOR SELECTING SWEET CASSAVA CLONES
author Santos, Vanderlei da Silva
author_facet Santos, Vanderlei da Silva
Santos , Maria Luiza Miranda dos
Sasaki, Fabiana Fumi Cerqueira
Oliveira, Luciana Alves de
Ledo, Carlos Alberto da Silva
author_role author
author2 Santos , Maria Luiza Miranda dos
Sasaki, Fabiana Fumi Cerqueira
Oliveira, Luciana Alves de
Ledo, Carlos Alberto da Silva
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, Vanderlei da Silva
Santos , Maria Luiza Miranda dos
Sasaki, Fabiana Fumi Cerqueira
Oliveira, Luciana Alves de
Ledo, Carlos Alberto da Silva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Manihot esculenta. Deterioração fisiológica de pós-colheita. Raízes comerciais.
Manihot esculenta. Postharvest physiological deterioration. Commercial roots.
topic Manihot esculenta. Deterioração fisiológica de pós-colheita. Raízes comerciais.
Manihot esculenta. Postharvest physiological deterioration. Commercial roots.
description The objective of this work was to evaluate the agronomic performance, cooking time and postharvest conservation of roots of sweet cassava clones, to select those superior to the Manteiga variety control, in the Baixo Sul region of Bahia state. A randomized block design in split plot scheme, with three replications was used. Eleven genotypes were evaluated at 10 and 12 months after planting. Considering the mean of two harvests, BRS Kiriris and Saracura showed total root yield (39.85 and 33.91 t ha-1, respectively) and commercial root yield (26.54 and 26.71 t ha-1) that are higher compared to Manteiga (total root yield: 28.06 t ha-1, commercial root yield: 16.95 t ha-1). However, both had cooking time (26.76 and 28.30 min, respectively) higher than that of Manteiga (23.89 min), and BRS Kiriris was unstable regarding the cooking percentage between 10 (91.67%) and 12 months (50%). BRS Aipim Brasil, 2003 14-11, BRS Kiriris, Eucalipto, Saracura and Manteiga were more tolerant to postharvest physiological deterioration. Although some of the evaluated clones presented good performance in the evaluated traits, by analyzing the set of traits, none of them shows sufficient superiority to be indicated as a potential substitute for Manteiga, grown in the Baixo Sul region of Bahia state.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-07-12
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/10298
10.1590/1983-21252022v35n324rc
url https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/10298
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1983-21252022v35n324rc
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/10298/11003
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Caatinga
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Caatinga
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 35 No. 3 (2022); 730-738
Revista Caatinga; v. 35 n. 3 (2022); 730-738
1983-2125
0100-316X
reponame:Revista Caatinga
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron:UFERSA
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron_str UFERSA
institution UFERSA
reponame_str Revista Caatinga
collection Revista Caatinga
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br
_version_ 1797674029450002432