AGRONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS, COOKING AND POSTHARVEST CONSERVATION FOR SELECTING SWEET CASSAVA CLONES
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Caatinga |
DOI: | 10.1590/1983-21252022v35n324rc |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/10298 |
Resumo: | The objective of this work was to evaluate the agronomic performance, cooking time and postharvest conservation of roots of sweet cassava clones, to select those superior to the Manteiga variety control, in the Baixo Sul region of Bahia state. A randomized block design in split plot scheme, with three replications was used. Eleven genotypes were evaluated at 10 and 12 months after planting. Considering the mean of two harvests, BRS Kiriris and Saracura showed total root yield (39.85 and 33.91 t ha-1, respectively) and commercial root yield (26.54 and 26.71 t ha-1) that are higher compared to Manteiga (total root yield: 28.06 t ha-1, commercial root yield: 16.95 t ha-1). However, both had cooking time (26.76 and 28.30 min, respectively) higher than that of Manteiga (23.89 min), and BRS Kiriris was unstable regarding the cooking percentage between 10 (91.67%) and 12 months (50%). BRS Aipim Brasil, 2003 14-11, BRS Kiriris, Eucalipto, Saracura and Manteiga were more tolerant to postharvest physiological deterioration. Although some of the evaluated clones presented good performance in the evaluated traits, by analyzing the set of traits, none of them shows sufficient superiority to be indicated as a potential substitute for Manteiga, grown in the Baixo Sul region of Bahia state. |
id |
UFERSA-1_ed9b4e05ca8ea1134f33497e8f889a7d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/10298 |
network_acronym_str |
UFERSA-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Caatinga |
spelling |
AGRONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS, COOKING AND POSTHARVEST CONSERVATION FOR SELECTING SWEET CASSAVA CLONESCARACTERÍSTICAS AGRONÔMICAS, COZIMENTO E CONSERVAÇÃO PÓS-COLHEITA PARA SELEÇÃO DE CLONES DE MANDIOCA DE MESAManihot esculenta. Deterioração fisiológica de pós-colheita. Raízes comerciais.Manihot esculenta. Postharvest physiological deterioration. Commercial roots.The objective of this work was to evaluate the agronomic performance, cooking time and postharvest conservation of roots of sweet cassava clones, to select those superior to the Manteiga variety control, in the Baixo Sul region of Bahia state. A randomized block design in split plot scheme, with three replications was used. Eleven genotypes were evaluated at 10 and 12 months after planting. Considering the mean of two harvests, BRS Kiriris and Saracura showed total root yield (39.85 and 33.91 t ha-1, respectively) and commercial root yield (26.54 and 26.71 t ha-1) that are higher compared to Manteiga (total root yield: 28.06 t ha-1, commercial root yield: 16.95 t ha-1). However, both had cooking time (26.76 and 28.30 min, respectively) higher than that of Manteiga (23.89 min), and BRS Kiriris was unstable regarding the cooking percentage between 10 (91.67%) and 12 months (50%). BRS Aipim Brasil, 2003 14-11, BRS Kiriris, Eucalipto, Saracura and Manteiga were more tolerant to postharvest physiological deterioration. Although some of the evaluated clones presented good performance in the evaluated traits, by analyzing the set of traits, none of them shows sufficient superiority to be indicated as a potential substitute for Manteiga, grown in the Baixo Sul region of Bahia state.O objetivo desse trabalho foi avaliar desempenho agronômico, tempo de cozimento e conservação pós-colheita de raízes de clones de mandioca de mesa, para selecionar aqueles superiores à testemunha Manteiga, na região do Baixo Sul do estado da Bahia. O delineamento foi em blocos casualizados e em esquema de parcelas subdivididas, com três repetições. Onze clones foram avaliados aos 10 e 12 meses após o plantio. Na média das duas colheitas, BRS Kiriris e Saracura tiveram produção total de raízes (39,85 e 33,91 t ha-1, respectivamente) e produção de raízes comerciais (26,54 e 26,71 t ha-1) superiores, comparados ao Manteiga (produção total de raízes: 28,06 t ha-1, produção de raízes comerciais: 16,95 t ha-1). Entretanto, ambos tiveram tempo de cozimento (26,76 e 28,30 min, respectivamente) maiores que o do Manteiga (23,89 min), e BRS Kiriris foi instável com relação à porcentagem de cozimento entre 10 (91,67%) e 12 meses (50%). BRS Aipim Brasil, 2003 14-11, BRS Kiriris, Eucalipto, Saracura e Manteiga foram mais tolerantes à deterioração fisiológica de pós-colheita. Embora alguns dos clones avaliados tenham apresentado bom desempenho nas características avaliadas, analisando-se o conjunto de características, nenhum deles apresenta superioridade suficiente para ser indicado como um potencial substituto do Manteiga, cultivado na região do Baixo Sul do estado da Bahia.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2022-07-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/1029810.1590/1983-21252022v35n324rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 35 No. 3 (2022); 730-738Revista Caatinga; v. 35 n. 3 (2022); 730-7381983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/10298/11003Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Caatingainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Vanderlei da SilvaSantos , Maria Luiza Miranda dosSasaki, Fabiana Fumi CerqueiraOliveira, Luciana Alves deLedo, Carlos Alberto da Silva2023-07-03T14:10:21Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/10298Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2024-04-29T09:46:55.970969Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
AGRONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS, COOKING AND POSTHARVEST CONSERVATION FOR SELECTING SWEET CASSAVA CLONES CARACTERÍSTICAS AGRONÔMICAS, COZIMENTO E CONSERVAÇÃO PÓS-COLHEITA PARA SELEÇÃO DE CLONES DE MANDIOCA DE MESA |
title |
AGRONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS, COOKING AND POSTHARVEST CONSERVATION FOR SELECTING SWEET CASSAVA CLONES |
spellingShingle |
AGRONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS, COOKING AND POSTHARVEST CONSERVATION FOR SELECTING SWEET CASSAVA CLONES AGRONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS, COOKING AND POSTHARVEST CONSERVATION FOR SELECTING SWEET CASSAVA CLONES Santos, Vanderlei da Silva Manihot esculenta. Deterioração fisiológica de pós-colheita. Raízes comerciais. Manihot esculenta. Postharvest physiological deterioration. Commercial roots. Santos, Vanderlei da Silva Manihot esculenta. Deterioração fisiológica de pós-colheita. Raízes comerciais. Manihot esculenta. Postharvest physiological deterioration. Commercial roots. |
title_short |
AGRONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS, COOKING AND POSTHARVEST CONSERVATION FOR SELECTING SWEET CASSAVA CLONES |
title_full |
AGRONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS, COOKING AND POSTHARVEST CONSERVATION FOR SELECTING SWEET CASSAVA CLONES |
title_fullStr |
AGRONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS, COOKING AND POSTHARVEST CONSERVATION FOR SELECTING SWEET CASSAVA CLONES AGRONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS, COOKING AND POSTHARVEST CONSERVATION FOR SELECTING SWEET CASSAVA CLONES |
title_full_unstemmed |
AGRONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS, COOKING AND POSTHARVEST CONSERVATION FOR SELECTING SWEET CASSAVA CLONES AGRONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS, COOKING AND POSTHARVEST CONSERVATION FOR SELECTING SWEET CASSAVA CLONES |
title_sort |
AGRONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS, COOKING AND POSTHARVEST CONSERVATION FOR SELECTING SWEET CASSAVA CLONES |
author |
Santos, Vanderlei da Silva |
author_facet |
Santos, Vanderlei da Silva Santos, Vanderlei da Silva Santos , Maria Luiza Miranda dos Sasaki, Fabiana Fumi Cerqueira Oliveira, Luciana Alves de Ledo, Carlos Alberto da Silva Santos , Maria Luiza Miranda dos Sasaki, Fabiana Fumi Cerqueira Oliveira, Luciana Alves de Ledo, Carlos Alberto da Silva |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Santos , Maria Luiza Miranda dos Sasaki, Fabiana Fumi Cerqueira Oliveira, Luciana Alves de Ledo, Carlos Alberto da Silva |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos, Vanderlei da Silva Santos , Maria Luiza Miranda dos Sasaki, Fabiana Fumi Cerqueira Oliveira, Luciana Alves de Ledo, Carlos Alberto da Silva |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Manihot esculenta. Deterioração fisiológica de pós-colheita. Raízes comerciais. Manihot esculenta. Postharvest physiological deterioration. Commercial roots. |
topic |
Manihot esculenta. Deterioração fisiológica de pós-colheita. Raízes comerciais. Manihot esculenta. Postharvest physiological deterioration. Commercial roots. |
description |
The objective of this work was to evaluate the agronomic performance, cooking time and postharvest conservation of roots of sweet cassava clones, to select those superior to the Manteiga variety control, in the Baixo Sul region of Bahia state. A randomized block design in split plot scheme, with three replications was used. Eleven genotypes were evaluated at 10 and 12 months after planting. Considering the mean of two harvests, BRS Kiriris and Saracura showed total root yield (39.85 and 33.91 t ha-1, respectively) and commercial root yield (26.54 and 26.71 t ha-1) that are higher compared to Manteiga (total root yield: 28.06 t ha-1, commercial root yield: 16.95 t ha-1). However, both had cooking time (26.76 and 28.30 min, respectively) higher than that of Manteiga (23.89 min), and BRS Kiriris was unstable regarding the cooking percentage between 10 (91.67%) and 12 months (50%). BRS Aipim Brasil, 2003 14-11, BRS Kiriris, Eucalipto, Saracura and Manteiga were more tolerant to postharvest physiological deterioration. Although some of the evaluated clones presented good performance in the evaluated traits, by analyzing the set of traits, none of them shows sufficient superiority to be indicated as a potential substitute for Manteiga, grown in the Baixo Sul region of Bahia state. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-07-12 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/10298 10.1590/1983-21252022v35n324rc |
url |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/10298 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1983-21252022v35n324rc |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/10298/11003 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Caatinga info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Caatinga |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 35 No. 3 (2022); 730-738 Revista Caatinga; v. 35 n. 3 (2022); 730-738 1983-2125 0100-316X reponame:Revista Caatinga instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) instacron:UFERSA |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
instacron_str |
UFERSA |
institution |
UFERSA |
reponame_str |
Revista Caatinga |
collection |
Revista Caatinga |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br |
_version_ |
1822181057128038400 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1983-21252022v35n324rc |