Best practices in implementing a project management office: a systematic review of the literature

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pinto, Gustavo Oliveira
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Mello, Luiz Carlos Brasil de Brito, Spiegel, Thaís
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Sistemas & Gestão
Texto Completo: https://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1580
Resumo: Highlights: Project management office (PMO) is structurally configured in a particular way to adapt to the peculiarities of each organization and its strategic objectives, in order to promote project management practices. The purpose of this article is to explore the best practices for project management office implementation. A systematic literature review was conducted using 104 documents published between 2000 and 2018. The research allowed the identification of PMO's data, such as functions, models, best practices in implementation, challenges to implementation, and success factors.Goal: The purpose of this article is to explore the best practices for project management office implementation.Design/Methodology/Approach: A systematic literature review was conducted using 104 documents published between 2000 and 2018.Results: The research allowed the identification of PMO's data, such as functions, models, best practices in implementation, challenges to implementation, and success factors.Limitations of the investigation: Other factors related to PMO, such as the implementation phases, maturity models, process groups, and organizational variables that affect PMO.Practical implications: It is observed that there are relevant issues in PMO implementation structuring that are not consolidated, making it difficult for organizations to base their implementation on the available theoretical frameworks.Originality/value: As a result, it became evident that there is a lack of standardization of those characteristics related to the PMO; and that the so-called "best practices" require more academic studies before they can be established.
id UFF-13_3d0508ff5e9418e4e8564efaad380777
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.revistasg.uff.br:article/1580
network_acronym_str UFF-13
network_name_str Sistemas & Gestão
repository_id_str
spelling Best practices in implementing a project management office: a systematic review of the literatureMelhores práticas na implantação de um escritório de gerenciamento de projetos: uma revisão sistemática da literaturaProject Management OfficeImplementationBest practicesLiterature reviewPMO.Escritório de Gerenciamento de ProjetosImplantaçãoMelhores práticasRevisão da literaturaEGP.Highlights: Project management office (PMO) is structurally configured in a particular way to adapt to the peculiarities of each organization and its strategic objectives, in order to promote project management practices. The purpose of this article is to explore the best practices for project management office implementation. A systematic literature review was conducted using 104 documents published between 2000 and 2018. The research allowed the identification of PMO's data, such as functions, models, best practices in implementation, challenges to implementation, and success factors.Goal: The purpose of this article is to explore the best practices for project management office implementation.Design/Methodology/Approach: A systematic literature review was conducted using 104 documents published between 2000 and 2018.Results: The research allowed the identification of PMO's data, such as functions, models, best practices in implementation, challenges to implementation, and success factors.Limitations of the investigation: Other factors related to PMO, such as the implementation phases, maturity models, process groups, and organizational variables that affect PMO.Practical implications: It is observed that there are relevant issues in PMO implementation structuring that are not consolidated, making it difficult for organizations to base their implementation on the available theoretical frameworks.Originality/value: As a result, it became evident that there is a lack of standardization of those characteristics related to the PMO; and that the so-called "best practices" require more academic studies before they can be established.Destaque: O escritório de gerenciamento de projetos (EGP) é estruturalmente configurado de uma maneira específica para se adaptar às peculiaridades de cada organização e seus objetivos estratégicos, a fim de promover práticas de gerenciamento de projetos. O objetivo deste artigo é explorar as melhores práticas para a implantação do escritório de gerenciamento de projetos. Para tanto, foi realizada uma revisão sistemática da literatura, com 104 documentos publicados entre 2000 e 2018. A pesquisa permitiu a identificação de dados do EGP, como funções, modelos, melhores práticas de implantação, desafios à implantação e fatores de sucesso.Objetivo: O objetivo deste artigo é explorar as melhores práticas para a implantação do escritório de gerenciamento de projetos.Projeto/Metodologia/Abordagem: Uma revisão sistemática da literatura foi realizada, utilizando 104 documentos publicados entre 2000 e 2018.Resultados: A pesquisa permitiu a identificação de dados do EGP, como funções, modelos, melhores práticas de implantação, desafios à implantação e fatores de sucesso.Limitações da investigação: Outros fatores relacionados ao EGP, como fases de implantação, modelos de maturidade, grupos de processos e variáveis organizacionais que afetam o EGP.Implicações práticas: Observa-se que existem questões relevantes na estrutura de implantação do EGP que não são consolidadas, dificultando que as organizações baseiem sua implantação nos marcos teóricos disponíveis.Originalidade/valor: Como resultado, tornou-se evidente a falta de padronização dessas características relacionadas ao EGP; e que as chamadas "melhores práticas" requerem mais estudos acadêmicos antes de serem estabelecidas.ABEC2020-01-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionRevisão de Literaturatext/htmltext/htmlapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/158010.20985/1980-5160.2019.v14n4.1580Sistemas & Gestão; v. 14 n. 4 (2019): DEZEMBRO 2019; 448-4631980-516010.20985/1980-5160.2019.v14n4reponame:Sistemas & Gestãoinstname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)instacron:UFFporenghttps://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1580/htmlhttps://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1580/html_1https://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1580/pdfhttps://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1580/pdf_1Copyright (c) 2019 Sistemas & Gestãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPinto, Gustavo OliveiraMello, Luiz Carlos Brasil de BritoSpiegel, Thaís2020-05-29T17:14:34Zoai:ojs.www.revistasg.uff.br:article/1580Revistahttps://www.revistasg.uff.br/sgPUBhttps://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/oai||sg.revista@gmail.com|| periodicos@proppi.uff.br1980-51601980-5160opendoar:2020-05-29T17:14:34Sistemas & Gestão - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Best practices in implementing a project management office: a systematic review of the literature
Melhores práticas na implantação de um escritório de gerenciamento de projetos: uma revisão sistemática da literatura
title Best practices in implementing a project management office: a systematic review of the literature
spellingShingle Best practices in implementing a project management office: a systematic review of the literature
Pinto, Gustavo Oliveira
Project Management Office
Implementation
Best practices
Literature review
PMO.
Escritório de Gerenciamento de Projetos
Implantação
Melhores práticas
Revisão da literatura
EGP.
title_short Best practices in implementing a project management office: a systematic review of the literature
title_full Best practices in implementing a project management office: a systematic review of the literature
title_fullStr Best practices in implementing a project management office: a systematic review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Best practices in implementing a project management office: a systematic review of the literature
title_sort Best practices in implementing a project management office: a systematic review of the literature
author Pinto, Gustavo Oliveira
author_facet Pinto, Gustavo Oliveira
Mello, Luiz Carlos Brasil de Brito
Spiegel, Thaís
author_role author
author2 Mello, Luiz Carlos Brasil de Brito
Spiegel, Thaís
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pinto, Gustavo Oliveira
Mello, Luiz Carlos Brasil de Brito
Spiegel, Thaís
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Project Management Office
Implementation
Best practices
Literature review
PMO.
Escritório de Gerenciamento de Projetos
Implantação
Melhores práticas
Revisão da literatura
EGP.
topic Project Management Office
Implementation
Best practices
Literature review
PMO.
Escritório de Gerenciamento de Projetos
Implantação
Melhores práticas
Revisão da literatura
EGP.
description Highlights: Project management office (PMO) is structurally configured in a particular way to adapt to the peculiarities of each organization and its strategic objectives, in order to promote project management practices. The purpose of this article is to explore the best practices for project management office implementation. A systematic literature review was conducted using 104 documents published between 2000 and 2018. The research allowed the identification of PMO's data, such as functions, models, best practices in implementation, challenges to implementation, and success factors.Goal: The purpose of this article is to explore the best practices for project management office implementation.Design/Methodology/Approach: A systematic literature review was conducted using 104 documents published between 2000 and 2018.Results: The research allowed the identification of PMO's data, such as functions, models, best practices in implementation, challenges to implementation, and success factors.Limitations of the investigation: Other factors related to PMO, such as the implementation phases, maturity models, process groups, and organizational variables that affect PMO.Practical implications: It is observed that there are relevant issues in PMO implementation structuring that are not consolidated, making it difficult for organizations to base their implementation on the available theoretical frameworks.Originality/value: As a result, it became evident that there is a lack of standardization of those characteristics related to the PMO; and that the so-called "best practices" require more academic studies before they can be established.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Revisão de Literatura
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1580
10.20985/1980-5160.2019.v14n4.1580
url https://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1580
identifier_str_mv 10.20985/1980-5160.2019.v14n4.1580
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1580/html
https://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1580/html_1
https://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1580/pdf
https://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1580/pdf_1
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Sistemas & Gestão
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Sistemas & Gestão
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
text/html
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABEC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABEC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Sistemas & Gestão; v. 14 n. 4 (2019): DEZEMBRO 2019; 448-463
1980-5160
10.20985/1980-5160.2019.v14n4
reponame:Sistemas & Gestão
instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
instacron:UFF
instname_str Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
instacron_str UFF
institution UFF
reponame_str Sistemas & Gestão
collection Sistemas & Gestão
repository.name.fl_str_mv Sistemas & Gestão - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sg.revista@gmail.com|| periodicos@proppi.uff.br
_version_ 1798320144981688320