Best practices in implementing a project management office: a systematic review of the literature
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Sistemas & Gestão |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1580 |
Resumo: | Highlights: Project management office (PMO) is structurally configured in a particular way to adapt to the peculiarities of each organization and its strategic objectives, in order to promote project management practices. The purpose of this article is to explore the best practices for project management office implementation. A systematic literature review was conducted using 104 documents published between 2000 and 2018. The research allowed the identification of PMO's data, such as functions, models, best practices in implementation, challenges to implementation, and success factors.Goal: The purpose of this article is to explore the best practices for project management office implementation.Design/Methodology/Approach: A systematic literature review was conducted using 104 documents published between 2000 and 2018.Results: The research allowed the identification of PMO's data, such as functions, models, best practices in implementation, challenges to implementation, and success factors.Limitations of the investigation: Other factors related to PMO, such as the implementation phases, maturity models, process groups, and organizational variables that affect PMO.Practical implications: It is observed that there are relevant issues in PMO implementation structuring that are not consolidated, making it difficult for organizations to base their implementation on the available theoretical frameworks.Originality/value: As a result, it became evident that there is a lack of standardization of those characteristics related to the PMO; and that the so-called "best practices" require more academic studies before they can be established. |
id |
UFF-13_3d0508ff5e9418e4e8564efaad380777 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.revistasg.uff.br:article/1580 |
network_acronym_str |
UFF-13 |
network_name_str |
Sistemas & Gestão |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Best practices in implementing a project management office: a systematic review of the literatureMelhores práticas na implantação de um escritório de gerenciamento de projetos: uma revisão sistemática da literaturaProject Management OfficeImplementationBest practicesLiterature reviewPMO.Escritório de Gerenciamento de ProjetosImplantaçãoMelhores práticasRevisão da literaturaEGP.Highlights: Project management office (PMO) is structurally configured in a particular way to adapt to the peculiarities of each organization and its strategic objectives, in order to promote project management practices. The purpose of this article is to explore the best practices for project management office implementation. A systematic literature review was conducted using 104 documents published between 2000 and 2018. The research allowed the identification of PMO's data, such as functions, models, best practices in implementation, challenges to implementation, and success factors.Goal: The purpose of this article is to explore the best practices for project management office implementation.Design/Methodology/Approach: A systematic literature review was conducted using 104 documents published between 2000 and 2018.Results: The research allowed the identification of PMO's data, such as functions, models, best practices in implementation, challenges to implementation, and success factors.Limitations of the investigation: Other factors related to PMO, such as the implementation phases, maturity models, process groups, and organizational variables that affect PMO.Practical implications: It is observed that there are relevant issues in PMO implementation structuring that are not consolidated, making it difficult for organizations to base their implementation on the available theoretical frameworks.Originality/value: As a result, it became evident that there is a lack of standardization of those characteristics related to the PMO; and that the so-called "best practices" require more academic studies before they can be established.Destaque: O escritório de gerenciamento de projetos (EGP) é estruturalmente configurado de uma maneira específica para se adaptar às peculiaridades de cada organização e seus objetivos estratégicos, a fim de promover práticas de gerenciamento de projetos. O objetivo deste artigo é explorar as melhores práticas para a implantação do escritório de gerenciamento de projetos. Para tanto, foi realizada uma revisão sistemática da literatura, com 104 documentos publicados entre 2000 e 2018. A pesquisa permitiu a identificação de dados do EGP, como funções, modelos, melhores práticas de implantação, desafios à implantação e fatores de sucesso.Objetivo: O objetivo deste artigo é explorar as melhores práticas para a implantação do escritório de gerenciamento de projetos.Projeto/Metodologia/Abordagem: Uma revisão sistemática da literatura foi realizada, utilizando 104 documentos publicados entre 2000 e 2018.Resultados: A pesquisa permitiu a identificação de dados do EGP, como funções, modelos, melhores práticas de implantação, desafios à implantação e fatores de sucesso.Limitações da investigação: Outros fatores relacionados ao EGP, como fases de implantação, modelos de maturidade, grupos de processos e variáveis organizacionais que afetam o EGP.Implicações práticas: Observa-se que existem questões relevantes na estrutura de implantação do EGP que não são consolidadas, dificultando que as organizações baseiem sua implantação nos marcos teóricos disponíveis.Originalidade/valor: Como resultado, tornou-se evidente a falta de padronização dessas características relacionadas ao EGP; e que as chamadas "melhores práticas" requerem mais estudos acadêmicos antes de serem estabelecidas.ABEC2020-01-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionRevisão de Literaturatext/htmltext/htmlapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/158010.20985/1980-5160.2019.v14n4.1580Sistemas & Gestão; v. 14 n. 4 (2019): DEZEMBRO 2019; 448-4631980-516010.20985/1980-5160.2019.v14n4reponame:Sistemas & Gestãoinstname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)instacron:UFFporenghttps://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1580/htmlhttps://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1580/html_1https://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1580/pdfhttps://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1580/pdf_1Copyright (c) 2019 Sistemas & Gestãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPinto, Gustavo OliveiraMello, Luiz Carlos Brasil de BritoSpiegel, Thaís2020-05-29T17:14:34Zoai:ojs.www.revistasg.uff.br:article/1580Revistahttps://www.revistasg.uff.br/sgPUBhttps://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/oai||sg.revista@gmail.com|| periodicos@proppi.uff.br1980-51601980-5160opendoar:2020-05-29T17:14:34Sistemas & Gestão - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Best practices in implementing a project management office: a systematic review of the literature Melhores práticas na implantação de um escritório de gerenciamento de projetos: uma revisão sistemática da literatura |
title |
Best practices in implementing a project management office: a systematic review of the literature |
spellingShingle |
Best practices in implementing a project management office: a systematic review of the literature Pinto, Gustavo Oliveira Project Management Office Implementation Best practices Literature review PMO. Escritório de Gerenciamento de Projetos Implantação Melhores práticas Revisão da literatura EGP. |
title_short |
Best practices in implementing a project management office: a systematic review of the literature |
title_full |
Best practices in implementing a project management office: a systematic review of the literature |
title_fullStr |
Best practices in implementing a project management office: a systematic review of the literature |
title_full_unstemmed |
Best practices in implementing a project management office: a systematic review of the literature |
title_sort |
Best practices in implementing a project management office: a systematic review of the literature |
author |
Pinto, Gustavo Oliveira |
author_facet |
Pinto, Gustavo Oliveira Mello, Luiz Carlos Brasil de Brito Spiegel, Thaís |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mello, Luiz Carlos Brasil de Brito Spiegel, Thaís |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pinto, Gustavo Oliveira Mello, Luiz Carlos Brasil de Brito Spiegel, Thaís |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Project Management Office Implementation Best practices Literature review PMO. Escritório de Gerenciamento de Projetos Implantação Melhores práticas Revisão da literatura EGP. |
topic |
Project Management Office Implementation Best practices Literature review PMO. Escritório de Gerenciamento de Projetos Implantação Melhores práticas Revisão da literatura EGP. |
description |
Highlights: Project management office (PMO) is structurally configured in a particular way to adapt to the peculiarities of each organization and its strategic objectives, in order to promote project management practices. The purpose of this article is to explore the best practices for project management office implementation. A systematic literature review was conducted using 104 documents published between 2000 and 2018. The research allowed the identification of PMO's data, such as functions, models, best practices in implementation, challenges to implementation, and success factors.Goal: The purpose of this article is to explore the best practices for project management office implementation.Design/Methodology/Approach: A systematic literature review was conducted using 104 documents published between 2000 and 2018.Results: The research allowed the identification of PMO's data, such as functions, models, best practices in implementation, challenges to implementation, and success factors.Limitations of the investigation: Other factors related to PMO, such as the implementation phases, maturity models, process groups, and organizational variables that affect PMO.Practical implications: It is observed that there are relevant issues in PMO implementation structuring that are not consolidated, making it difficult for organizations to base their implementation on the available theoretical frameworks.Originality/value: As a result, it became evident that there is a lack of standardization of those characteristics related to the PMO; and that the so-called "best practices" require more academic studies before they can be established. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-20 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Revisão de Literatura |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1580 10.20985/1980-5160.2019.v14n4.1580 |
url |
https://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1580 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.20985/1980-5160.2019.v14n4.1580 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1580/html https://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1580/html_1 https://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1580/pdf https://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1580/pdf_1 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Sistemas & Gestão info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Sistemas & Gestão |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html text/html application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ABEC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ABEC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Sistemas & Gestão; v. 14 n. 4 (2019): DEZEMBRO 2019; 448-463 1980-5160 10.20985/1980-5160.2019.v14n4 reponame:Sistemas & Gestão instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) instacron:UFF |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
instacron_str |
UFF |
institution |
UFF |
reponame_str |
Sistemas & Gestão |
collection |
Sistemas & Gestão |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Sistemas & Gestão - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sg.revista@gmail.com|| periodicos@proppi.uff.br |
_version_ |
1798320144981688320 |